Datos de investigación
Investigador/a: DANIEL REY GARCIA
16 datos de investigación referenciados
2012
-
(Figure 10a, 11, 12) Benthic electromagnetic profile of GeoB130124 on the northwest Iberian shelf
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 10b, 11) Benthic electromagnetic profile of GeoB130106 on the northwest Iberian shelf
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 2) Primary magnetic field intensity distribution of EM sensor
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 3) Modeled GEM-3 susceptibility and conductivity response under decreasing water depth
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 4a) Relative contribution of the magnetic response to total in-phase signal in function of EM field frequency, sediment susceptibility and conductivity
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 4b) Frequency-dependence of inphase and quadrature conductivity noise floor
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 5a) Vertical sensor characteristics of GEM-3 (96 cm coil) for in-phase susceptibility
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 5b) Vertical sensor characteristics of GEM-3 (96 cm coil) for quadrature conductivity given as weighting functions and cumulative subsurface response
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 5c) In-phase and quadrature responses of GEM-3 sensor at various operation frequencies
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 6a) Lateral response of GEM-3 sensor (96 cm coil) for susceptibility and 5 kHz quadrature conductivity on homogeneous seafloor
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 6b) Horizontal footprint diameter (90% of the total signal) and half-width (50%) of susceptibility, quadrature and in-phase conductivity
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 7a) Simulations of apparent susceptibility and conductivity profiles of a dipping mud/sand boundary
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 7b) Apparent susceptibility profiles by various available sensor sizes of dipping sulfidic (magnetite-reducing) zone
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 9a) Correlation of EM and sediment core porosity
PANGAEA
-
(Figure 9b) Correlation of EM and sediment core susceptibility
PANGAEA