Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adultsa meta-analytic review

Referencias bibliográficas

• *Akehurst, L., Easton, S., Fullar, E., Drane, G., Kuzmin, K. y Litchfield, S. (2015). An evaluation of a new tool to aid judgements of credibility in the medico−legal setting. Legal and Criminological Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/ lcrp.12079
• Amado, B.G., Arce, R. y Fariña, F. (2015). Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: A meta−analytic review. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7, 3−12. doi:10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002
• Anson, D.A., Golding, S.L. y Gully, K.J. (1993). Child sexual abuse allegations: Reliability of Criteria−Based Content Analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 331−341. doi:10.1007/BF01044512
• Arce, R. y Fariña, F. (2005). Peritación psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio, la huella psíquica y la simulación: El Sistema de Evaluación Global (SEG). Papeles del Psicólogo, 26, 59−77.
• Arce, R. y Fariña, F. (2009). Evaluación psicológica forense de la credibilidad y daño psíquico en casos de violencia de género mediante el Sistema de Evaluación Global. En F. Fariña, R. Arce y G. Buela−Casal (Eds.), Violencia de género. Tratado psicológico y legal (pp. 147−168). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
• Arce, R. y Fariña, F. (2012). Psicología social aplicada al ámbito jurídico. En A.V. Arias, J.F. Morales, E. Nouvilas y J.L. Martínez (Eds.), Psicología social aplicada (pp. 157−182). Madrid: Panamericana.
• Arce, R., Fariña, F. y Fraga, A. (2000). Género y formación de juicios en un caso de violación. Psicothema, 12, 623−628.
• *Arce, R., Fariña, F. y Vilariño, M. (2010). Contraste de la efectividad del CBCA en la evaluación de la credibilidad en casos de violencia de género. Intervención Psicosocial, 19, 109−119. doi:10.5093/in2010v19n2a2
• *Beaulieu−Prévost, D. (2001). Analyse de validité de la déclaration (SVA), mensonge et faux souvenirs: Validité et efficacité chez les adultes. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations y Theses Global. (Order No. MQ60609)
• *Bensi, L., Gambetti, E., Nori, R. y Giusberti, F. (2009). Discerning truth from deception: The sincere witness profile. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 1, 101−121.
• Berliner, L. y Conte, J.R. (1993). Sexual abuse evaluation: Conceptual and empirical obstacles. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 111−125. doi:10.1016/0145−2134(93)90012−T
• *Biland, C., Py, J. y Rimboud, S. (1999). Evaluer la sincérité d’un témoin grâce à trois techniques d’analyse, verbales et non verbale. European Review of Applied Psychology–Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 49, 115−122.
• *Blandón−Gitlin, I., Pezdek, K., Lindsay, D.S. y Hagen, L. (2009). Criteria−Based Content Analysis of true and suggested accounts of events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 901−917. doi:10.1002/acp.1504
• *Bogaard, G., Meijer, E.H. y Vrij, A. (2013). Using an example statement increases information but does not increase accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11, 151−163. doi:10.1002/jip.1409
• Botella, J. y Gambara, H. (2006). Doing and reporting a meta− analysis. International Journal of Clinical y Health Psychology, 6, 425−440.
• *Caso, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S. y de Leo, G. (2006). Deceptive responses: The impact of verbal and non−verbal countermeasures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 99−111. doi:10.1348/ 135532505X49936
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2ª ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
• *Critchlow, N. (2011). Applying Criteria Based Content Analysis to assessing the veracity of rape statements (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
• *Critchlow, N. (2011). [A field validation of CBCA when assessing authentic police rape statements: evidence for discriminant validity to prescribe veracity to adult narrative]. Unpublished raw data.
• *Dana−Kirby, L. (1997). Discerning truth from deception: Is Criteria− Based Content Analysis effective with adult statements? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon, Oregon.
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). *Evans, J., Michael, S.W., Meissner, C.A. y Brandon, S.E. (2013).
• Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a psychologically based credibility assessment tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 33−41. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.02.002
• Fariña, F., Arce, R. y Novo, M. (2002). Heurístico de anclaje en las decisiones judiciales. Psicothema, 14, 39−46.
• Fariña, F., Arce, R. y Real, S. (1994). Ruedas de identificación: De la simulación y la realidad. Psicothema, 6, 395−402.
• *Gödert, H.W., Gamer, M., Rill, H.G. y Vossel, G. (2005). Statement Validity Assessment: Inter−rater reliability of Criteria−Based Content Analysis in the mock−crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225−245. doi:10.1348/135532505X52680
• *Godoy, V. y Higueras, L. (2008). El análisis de contenido basado en criterios (CBCA) y la entrevista cognitiva aplicados a la credibilidad del testimonio en adultos. En F. Rodríguez, C. Bringas, F. Fariña, R. Arce y A. Bernardo (Eds.), Psicología Jurídica: Entorno judicial y delincuencia (pp. 117−125). Recuperado de http:// gip.uniovi.es/T5EJD.pdf
• Hans, V.P. y Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
• Hedges, L.V. y Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta−analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press
• Höfer, E., Köhnken, G., Hanewinkel, R. y Bruhn, C. (1993). Diagnostik und attribution von glaubwürdigkeit. Unpublished final report. University of Kiel, Germany.
• *Honts, C.R. y Devitt, M.K. (1993). Credibility Assessment of Verbatim Statements (CAVS). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/ dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a271575.pdf
• Horowitz, S.W., Lamb, M.E., Esplin, P.W., Boychuk, T.D., Krispin, O. y Reiter−Lavery, L. (1997). Reliability of criteria−based content analysis of child witness statements. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 11−21. doi:10.1111/j.2044−8333.1997.tb00329.x
• Hunter, J.E. y Schmidt, F.L. (2015). Methods of meta−analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• *Johnston, S., Candelier, A., Powers−Green, D. y Rahmani, S. (2014). Attributes of truthful versus deceitful statements in the evaluation of accused child molesters. Sage Open, 4(3), 1−10. doi:10.1177/2158244014548849
• *Juárez, J.R., Mateu, A. y Sala, E. (2007). Criterios de evaluación de la credibilidad en las denuncias de violencia de género. Recuperado de http://justicia.gencat.cat/web/.content/documents/arxius/sc−3−143−07−cas.pdf
• Köhnken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. En G.R. Semin y K. Fiedler (Eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 257−282). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement Validity Analysis and the detection of the truth. En P.A. Granhag y L.A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 41−63). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• *Köhnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E. y Höfer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults’ statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671−684. doi:10.1037/0021−9010.80.6.671
• Konecni, V.J. y Ebbesen, E.B. (1992). Methodological issues on legal decision−making, with special reference to experimental simulations. En F. Lösel, D. Bender, y T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law. International perspectives (pp. 413−423). Berlín: Walter de Gruyter.
• *Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., Vernham, Z. y Fisher, R.P. (2015). You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 129−146. doi:10.1111/ lcrp.12017
• *Lee, Z., Klaver, J.R. y Hart, S.D. (2008). Psychopathy and verbal indicators of deception in offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 73−84. doi:10.1080/10683160701423738
• McNatt, D.B. (2000). Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: A meta−analysis of the result. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 314−322. doi:10.1037/0021−9010.85.2.314
• *Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1371−1382. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.007
• Novo, M. y Seijo, D. (2010). Judicial judgement−making and legal criteria of testimonial credibility. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2, 91−115.
• *Porter, S. y Yuille, J.C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443−458. doi:10.1007/ BF01498980
• *Porter, S., Yuille, J.C. y Lehman, D.R. (1999). The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 517−537. doi:10.1023/A:1022344128649
• Raskin, D.C., Esplin, F.W. y Horowitz, S. (1991). Investigative interviews and assessment of children in sexual abuse cases. Manuscrito no publicado, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Utah.
• *Rassin, E. y van der Sleen, J. (2005). Characteristics of true versus false allegations of sexual offences. Psychological Reports, 97, 589−598. doi:10.2466/pr0.97.2.589−598
• Sarwar, F., Allwood, C.M. y Innes−Ker, A. (2014). Effects of different types of forensic information on eyewitness' memory and confidence accuracy. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6, 17−27. doi:10.5093/ejpalc2014a3
• *Schelleman−Offermans, K. y Merckelbach, H. (2010). Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 247−260. doi:10.1002/jip.121
• *Sporer, S.L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self−experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373−397. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099−0720(199710)11:5<373::AID− ACP461>3.0.CO;2−0
• Steller, M. y Böhm, C. (2006). Cincuenta años de jurisprudencia del Tribunal Federal Supremo alemán sobre la psicología del testimonio. Balance y perspectiva. En T. Fabian, C. Böhm y J. Romero (Eds.), Nuevos caminos y conceptos en la psicología jurídica (pp. 53−67). Münster: LIT Verlag.
• Steller, M. y Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria−Based Content Analysis. En D.C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217−245). Nueva York: Springer−Verlag.
• *Ternes, M. (2009). Verbal credibility assessment of incarcerated violent offenders’ memory reports. Tesis Doctoral no publicada. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
• Tukey, J.W. (1960). A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. En I. Olkin, J.G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W.G. Madoo y H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 448−485). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der glaubhaftigkeit von aussagen. en U. Undeutsch (Ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Vol. 11: Forensische Psychologie (pp. 26−181). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
• *Vilariño, M. (2010). ¿Es posible discriminar declaraciones reales de imaginadas y huella psíquica real de simulada en casos de violencia de género? (Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain). Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10347/2831
• Vilariño, M., Novo, M. y Seijo, D. (2011). Estudio de la eficacia de las categorías de realidad del testimonio del Sistema de Evaluación Global (SEG) en casos de violencia de género. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 2, 1−26.
• Volbert, R. y Steller, M. (2014). Is this testimony truthful, fabricated, or based on false memory? Credibility assessment 25 years after Steller and Köhnken (1989). European Psychologist, 19, 207−220. doi:10.1027/1016−9040/a000200
• Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria−Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3−41. doi:10.1037/1076−8971.11.1.3
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2ª ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
• Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S. y Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 261−283. doi:10.1023/A:1015313120905
• *Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, R., y Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in chldren and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 8−41. doi:10.1111/j.1468−2958.2004.tb00723.x
• *Vrij, A., Edward, K. y Bull, R. (2001). People’s insight into their own behaviour and speech content while lying. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 373−389. doi:10.1348/000712601162248
• *Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K.P. y Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239−263. doi:10.1023/A:1006610329284
• *Vrij, A., Evans, H., Akehurst, L. y Mann, S. (2004). Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 283−296. doi:10.1002/acp.964
• *Vrij, A. y Heaven, S. (1999). Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 203−215. doi:10.1080/10683169908401767
• *Vrij, A., Kneller, W. y Mann, S. (2000). The effect of informing liars about Criteria−Based Content Analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA−raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 57−70. doi:10.1348/135532500167976
• *Vrij, A. y Mann, S., (2006). Criteria−Based Content Analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 337−349. doi:10.1080/10683160500129007
• *Vrij, A., Mann, S. y Edward, K. (2000). I think it was a green scarf but I am not sure. Raising doubts about one’s own testimony during lying and truth telling. En A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz−Obydzinska y J. Wójcikiewicz, (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law. Traditional questions and new ideas (pp. 205−207). Institute of forensic research, Poland: Krakow.
• *Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S. y Fisher, R.P. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449−518. doi:10.1007/ s10979−006−9066−4
• *Willén, R.M. y Strömwall, L.A. (2011). Offender’s uncoerced false confessions: A new application of statement analysis? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 346−359. doi:10.1111/j.2044−8333.2011.02018.x.
• *Wojciechowski, B.W. (2014). Content analysis algorithms: An innovative and accurate approach to statement veracity assessment. European Poligraph, 8, 119−128. doi:0.2478/ep−2014−0010
• ∗Indicates the primary studies included in the meta-analysis.