Custodia compartida, corresponsabilidad parental y justicia terapéutica como nuevo paradigma

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ackerman, M.J., Clinician's guide to child custody evaluations. 1995, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
• Alcazar, R., Diseño de una escala para la evaluación de la custodia compartida en el ámbito judicial Estrategia para la validación científica de la escala (ICC). Revista Internacional de Trabajo Social y Bienestar 3 (2014), 271–277.
• Amato, P., Research on Divorce: Continuing Trends and New Developments. Journal of Marriage and Family 72 (2010), 650–666.
• Amato, P., The consequences of divorce for adults and children. An update. DruštvenaIstraživanja 23 (2014), 5–24 Recuperado de http://www.pilar.hr/drustvena-istrazivanja/index.php?journal=drustvena-istrazivanja&page=article&op=view&path=348&path=201.
• American Law Institute. Principles of the law of family dissolution: Analysis and recommendations. 2002, Matthew Bender, Newark, NJ.
• American Psychological Association (1995). Preliminary summary: Empirical research describing outcomes of joint custody. A report prepared for the U.S. Commission on Child and Family Welfare.
• Arce, R. y Fariña. F. (2007). Un programa de intervención con menores en riesgo por desestructuración familiar. En F. J. Rodríguez y C. Becedóniz (Coord.), El menor infractor. Posicionamientos y realidades (pp. 264-279). Consejería de Justicia, Seguridad Pública y Relaciones Exteriores. Gobierno de Asturias.
• Arce, R., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Novo, M., Assessing impression management with the MMPI-2 in child custody litigation. Assessment 22 (2015), 769–777.
• Babb, B.A., An interdisciplinary approach to family law jurisprudence: application of an ecological and therapeutic perspective. Indiana Law Journal, 72(3), 1997 Recuperado de http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj.
• Babb, B.A., Commentaries on the IAALS’ Honoring Families Initiative White Paper. Family Court Review 52 (2014), 639–641.
• Bauserman, R., Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology 16 (2002), 91–102.
• Bauserman, R., A meta-analysis of parental satisfaction, adjustment, and conflict in joint custody and sole custody following divorce. Journal of Divorce and & Remarriage 53 (2012), 468–488.
• Bayata, A., Why not enforce? A critical analysis of the refusal to enforce foreign joint custody judgments in Turkish courts. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 27 (2013), 310–331.
• Bergström, M., Fransson, E., Hjern, A., Köhler, L., Wallby, T., Mental health in Swedish children living in joint physical custody and their parents’ life satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 55 (2014), 433–439.
• Bergström, M., Fransson, E., Modin, B., Berlin, M., Gustafsson, P., Hjern, A., Fifty moves a year: is there an association between joint physical custody and psychosomatic problems in children?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 69 (2014), 769–774.
• Bjarnason, T., Arnarsson, A., Joint physical custody and communication with parents: A cross-national study of children in 36 western countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 42 (2011), 871–890.
• Boone-Holladay, T., Introduction to the classic edition. Booth, A., Crouter, A.C., Clements, M.L., Boone-Holladay, T., (eds.) Couples in conflict. Classic edition, 2016, Routledge Classic Edition, New York, xv–xxx.
• Breivik, K., Olweus, D., Adolescent's adjustment in four post-divorce family structures. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 44 (2006), 99–124.
• Briones, P.J., Villanueva, L., Impacto de la ley de custodia compartida de la Comunidad Valenciana en las modificaciones de medida. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica 24 (2014), 43–48.
• Brinig, M., Buckley, F., Joint custody: bonding and monitoring theories. Indiana Law Journal 73 (1998), 393–452.
• Buchanan, C.M., Maccoby, E.E., Dornbusch, S.M., Adolescents after divorce. 1996, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Campana, K., Henderson, S., Stolberg, A., Parenting styles and children's adjustment to divorce. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 48 (2008), 1–20.
• Cancian, M., Meyer, D., Who gets custody?. Demography 35 (1998), 147–157.
• Cancian, M., Meyer, D., Brown, P., Cook, S., Who Gets Custody Now? Dramatic Changes in Children's Living Arrangements After Divorce. Demography 51 (2014), 1381–1396.
• Carlsund, Å., Eriksson, U., Sellström, E., Shared physical custody after family split-up: implications for health and well-being in Swedish school children. Acta Paediatrica 102 (2013), 318–323.
• Cavanagh, S., Huston, A.C., The timing of family instability and children's social development. Journal of Marriage and Family 70 (2008), 1258–1270.
• Cherlin, A., Chase-Lansdale, L., McRae, C., Effects of parental divorce on mental health throughout the life course. American Sociological Review 63 (1998), 245–246.
• Coates, C.A., Deutsch, R., Starnes, H., Sullivan, M.J., Sydlik, B., Parenting coordination for high-conflict families. Family Court Review 42 (2004), 246–262.
• Consejo de Europa (2015). Resolución 2079/2015 sobre igualdad y corresponsabilidad. Recuperado de http://semantic-pace.net/tools/pdf.aspx?doc=aHR0cDovL2Fzc2VtYmx5LmNvZS5pbnQvbncveG1sL1hSZWYvWDJILURXLWV4dHIuYXNwP2ZpbGVpZD0yMjIyMCZsYW5nPUVO&xsl=aHR0cDovL3NlbWFudGljcGFjZS5uZXQvWHNsdC9QZGYvWFJlZi1XRC1BVC1YTUwyUERGLnhzbA=&xsltparams=ZmlsZWlkPTIyMjIw.
• Cortes Generales (1981). Ley 30/1981, de 7 de julio, por la que se modifica la regulación del matrimonio en el Código Civil y se determina el procedimiento a seguir en las causas de nulidad, separación y divorcio. Recuperado de https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/1981/07/20/pdfs/A16457-16462.pdf.
• Cortes Generales (2005). Ley 15/2005, de 8 de julio, por la que se modifican el Código Civil y la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil en materia de separación y divorcio. Recuperado de https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2005/07/09/pdfs/A24458-24461.pdf.
• Daicoff, S., The comprehensive law movement: An emerging approach to legal problems. Scandinavian Studies in Law 49 (2006), 109–129.
• Ellis, M., Divorce wars: Interventions with families in conflict. 2000, American Psychology Association, Washington, DC.
• Fabricius, W.V., Braver, S.L., Diaz, P., Velez, C.E., Custody and parenting time: Links to family relationships and well-being after divorce. Lamb, M., (eds.) The role of the father in child development, 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, US, 201–240.
• Fabricius, W., Luecken, L., Postdivorce living arrangements, parent conflict and physical health for children of divorce. Journal of Family Psychology 21 (2007), 195–205.
• Fariña, F., Arce, M., Psicología jurídica al servicio del menor. 2000, Cedecs, Barcelona.
• Fariña, F., Arce, R., Novo, M. y Seijo, D. (2012). De las necesidades de los menores a la intervención: un programa con menores en riesgo de desestructuración familiar. En M. Isorna y D. Saavedra (Coords.), Prevención de drogodependencias y otras conductas adictivas, (pp. 305-317). Madrid: Pirámide.
• Fariña, F., Arce, R. y Seijo, D. (2015). El conflicto familiar. Especial referencia a las consecuencias de la separación y divorcio. En F. Fariña y E. Pillado (Coords.), Mediación familiar. Una nueva visión de la gestión y resolución de conflictos familiares desde la justicia terapéutica (pp. 37-58). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
• Fariña, F., Arce, R., Vázquez, M.J., Novo, M., Seijo, D., The views of Spanish undergraduates on gender equality, parental responsibilities and joint-custody. Advances in Applied Sociology 3 (2013), 54–60.
• Fariña, F., Novo, M., Arce, R., Seijo, D., Programa de intervención “Ruptura de pareja, no de familia” con familias inmersas en procesos de separación. Revista de Psicopatología Clínica, Legal y Forense 2 (2002), 67–85.
• Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Arce, M., Novo, M., Psicología jurídica de la familia. Intervención en casos de separación y divorcio. 2002, Cedecs, Barcelona.
• Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Novo, M., Arce, R., La justicia terapéutica en procesos de ruptura de pareja: El papel del psicólogo. Chan, C., Estrada, C., Rodríguez, F.J., (eds.) Aportaciones a la psicología jurídica y forense desde Iberoamérica, 2014, Manual Moderno, México, DF, 113–134.
• Fariña, F., Tortosa, F., Arce, R., Psicología jurídica del menor y el contexto familiar: Una mirada al pasado, presente y futuro. Fariña, F., Arce, R., Novo, M., (eds.) Psicología jurídica del menor y de la familia, 2005, Consellería de Xustiza, Interior e Administración Local, Santiago de Compostela, 9–27.
• Felson, R.B., Savolainen, J., Bjarnason, T., Anderson, A.L., Zohra, I.T., The cultural context of adolescent drinking and violence in 30 European countries. Criminology 49 (2011), 699–728.
• Fox, G., Kelly, R., Determinants of Child Custody Arrangements at Divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family 57 (1995), 693–708.
• Fransson, E., Turunen, J., Hjern, A., Östberg, V., Bergström, M., Psychological complaints among children in joint physical custody and other family types: Considering parental factors. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 44 (2015), 177–183.
• Garnefski, N., Diekstra, R., Child sexual abuse and emotional and behaviour problems in adolescence. gender differences. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 36 (1997), 323–329.
• Hagquist, C., Family residency and psychosomatic problems among adolescents in Sweden: The impact of child-parent relations. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 44 (2016), 36–46.
• Haimi, M., Lerner, A., The impact of parental separation and divorce on the health status of children, and the ways to improve it. Journal of Clinical and Medical Genomics 4 (2016), 1–7, 10.4172/jcmg.1000137.
• Halla, M., The effect of joint custody on family outcomes. Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (2013), 278–315.
• Hemminki, K., Chen, B., Lifestyle and cancer: effect of parental divorce. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 15 (2006), 524–530.
• Hetherington, E.M., Kelly, J., En lo bueno y en lo malo: la experiencia del divorcio. Cómo influye realmente la separación en la vida de padres e hijos. 2005, Paidós, Barcelona.
• Ibáñez, V., El laberinto de la custodia compartida. Claroscuros de un solo nombre con varios significados. Boletín de Derecho de Familia 4 (2004), 40–41.
• Jensen, A.M., McKee, L., Introduction: Theorizing childhood and family change. Jensen, A.M., McKee, L., (eds.) Children and the hanging family. Between transformation and negotiation, 2003, Routledge, London, UK, 1–13.
• Johnston, S.R., Research update: Children's adjustment in sole custody compared to joint custody families and principles for custody decision making. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 33 (1995), 415–425.
• Johston, J.R., Kline, M., Tschann, J.M., Ongoing postdivorce conflict: Effects on children of joint custody and frequent access. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 59 (1989), 576–592.
• Kaiser, K., Holtfreter, K., An integrated theory of specialized court programs using procedural justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence to promote offender compliance and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 20 (2015), 1–18.
• Kalmijn, M. (2016). Exploring the personality structure of anonymous unspecified kidney donors (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Leiden.
• Kaslow, F., Divorce fathers and their families. Legal, economic and emotional dilemmas. 2013, Springer, Nueva York.
• Kelly, J.B., Children's living arrangements following separation and divorce: insights from empirical and clinical research. Family Process 46 (2007), 35–52.
• King, V., Parental divorce and interpersonal trust in adult offspring. Journal of Marriage and the Family 64 (2002), 642–656.
• Lamb, M., The role of the father. 2004, Wiley, New York.
• Lee, M., Children's adjustment in maternal and dual residence arrangements. Journal of Family Issues 23 (2002), 671–687.
• Lorenz, F.O., Wickrama, K.A., Conger, R.D., Elder, G.H., The short-term and decade-long effects of divorce on women's midlife health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 47 (2006), 111–125.
• Lund, M.E., The place for custody evaluation in family peacemaking. Family Court Review 53 (2015), 407–417.
• Maier, H., Lachman, M., Consequences of early parental loss and separation for health and well-being in midlife. International Journal of Behavioral Development 24 (2000), 183–189.
• Mardomingo, M.J., Divorcio y separación de los padres. Mardomingo, M.J., (eds.) Psiquiatría del niño y del adolescente, 1994, Díaz de Santos, Madrid, 623–638.
• McIntosh, J., Burns, A., Dowd, N., Gridley, H., Parenting after separation. 2009, Australian Psychological Society, Melbourne.
• McMillan, R., McIsaac, M. y Janssen, I. (2016). Family Structure as a Correlate of Organized Sport Participation among Youth. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147403.
• Melli, M., Brown, P., Exploring a new family form: The shared time family. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family 22 (2008), 231–269.
• Ministerio de Justicia (2014). Anteproyecto de Ley sobre el Ejercicio de la Corresponsabilidad Parental en caso de Nulidad, Separación y Divorcio (aprobado en el Consejo de Ministros, el 24 de julio). Recuperado de http://www.juecesdemocracia.es/LegislacionActual/Anteproyecto%20de%20Ley%20Custodia%20Compartida%20CM%2019-7-13.pdf.
• Moxnes, C., Children coping with parental divorce. Jensen, A.M., McKee, L., (eds.) Children and the changing family. Between transformation and negotiation, 2003, Routledge, London, UK, 90–104.
• Nielsen, L., Fathers and daughters: Contemporary research and issues. 2011, Routledge, New York.
• Nielsen, L., Shared parenting after divorce: A Review of shared residential parenting research. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 52 (2013), 586–609.
• Novo, M., Seijo, D. y Souto, A. (2010). Influencia de la ruptura parental en el estado de salud mental de los hijos. En F. Expósito. M. Herrera. G. Buela y F. Fariña (Coords.). Psicología Jurídica. Áreas de investigación (pp. 349-359). Consellería de Presidencia, Administración Pública e Xustiza. Xunta de Galicia. Santiago de Compostela.
• O'Donohue, W., Beitz, K., Tolle, L., Controversies in child custody evaluations. Skeem, J.L., Doublas, K.S., Lilienfield, S.O., (eds.) Psychological science in the courtroom: Consensus and controversy, 2009, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, 284–308.
• ONU (1989). Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño (adoptada por la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas el 20 de noviembre). Recuperado de https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/1990/12/31/pdfs/A38897-38904.pdf.
• Orgilés, M., Amorós, J.P., Espada, J.P., Méndez, J., Trastorno de ansiedad por separación en hijos de padres divorciados. Psicothema 20 (2008), 383–388.
• Pearson, J., Thoennes, N., Custody after divorce: Demographic and attitudinal patterns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 60 (1990), 233–324.
• Prazen, A., Wolfinger, N., Cahill, C., Kowaleski-Jones, L., Joint physical custody and neighborhood friendships in middle childhood. Sociological Inquiry 81 (2011), 247–259.
• Ramírez, M., Cuando los padres se separan. Alternativas de custodia para los hijos. Guía Práctica. 2003, Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.
• Rothberg, B., Joint custody: Parental problems and satisfactions. Family Process 22 (1983), 43–52.
• Seijo, D., Novo, M., Carracedo, S., Fariña, F., Efectos de la ruptura de los progenitores en la salud física y psicoemocional de los hijos. Revista Galega de Cooperación Científica Iberoamericana 19 (2010), 16–21.
• Shiller, V.M., Joint versus maternal custody for families with latency age boys: parent characteristics and child adjustment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 56 (1986), 486–489.
• Simón, M., Aportaciones del trabajo social a la pericial de familia. Cuadernos de Derecho Judicial 2 (2009), 175–221.
• Sodermans, A., Botteman, S., Havermans, N., Matthijs, K., Involved fathers, liberated mothers? Joint physical custody and their subjective well-being of divorce. Social Indicators Research 122 (2015), 257–277.
• Sodermans, A.K., Matthijs, K., Joint physical custody and adolescents’ subjective well-being: A personality × environment interaction. Journal of Family Psychology 28 (2014), 346–356.
• Sodermans, A.K., Matthijs, K., Swicegoog, G., Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders. Demographic Research 28 (2013), 821–848.
• Spruijt, E., Duindam, V., Joint physical custody in the Netherlands and the well being of children. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 51 (2010), 65–82.
• Stobbs, N. (2013). Mainstreaming therapeutic jurisprudence and the adversarial paradigm—incommensurability and the possibility of a shared disciplinary matrix (tesis doctoral). Bond University. Queensland, Australia. Recuperado de http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1128&context=theses.
• Tamanza, G., Molgora, S., Ranieri, S., Separation and divorce in Italy: Parenthood, children's custody, and family mediation. Family Court Review 51 (2013), 557–567.
• Town, M.A., The unified family court: therapeutic justice for families and children. 1994, Chicago Bar Association Building, Chicago, IL.
• Tribunal Supremo (2011). Sentencia 496/2011, de 7 de julio. Recuperada de http://portaljuridico.lexnova.es/jurisprudencia/JURIDICO/79395/sentencia-ts-496-2011-sala-1-de-7-de-julio-guarda-y-custodia-menores-proteccion.
• Tribunal Supremo (2012). Sentencia 185/2012, de 17 de octubre. Recuperada de https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2012/11/14/pdfs/BOE-A-2012-14060.pdf.
• Troxel, W.M., Mathews, K.A., What are the cost of marital conflict and dissolution to children's physical health?. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 7 (2004), 29–57.
• Vanassche, S., Corijn, M., Swicegood, G., Matthijs, K., Repartnering and childbearing after divorce: differences according to parental status and custodial arrangements. Population Research and Policy Review 34 (2015), 761–784.
• Vanassche, S., Sodermans, A., Matthijs, K., Swicegood, L., Commuting between two parental households: The association between joint physical custody and adolescent wellbeing following divorce. Journal of Family Studies 19 (2013), 139–158.
• Wade, A., Smart, C., As fair as it can be?. Jensen, A.M., McKee, L., (eds.) Children and the changing family. Between transformation and negotiation, 2003, Routledge, London, UK, 105–119.
• Wall, J.C., Amadio, C., An integrated approach to child custody evaluation: utilizing the “best interest” of the child and family systems frameworks. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 21:3/4 (1994), 39–57.
• Wallerstein, J., Kelly, J., Surviving the breakup: How children and parents cope with the divorce. 1980, Basic Books, New York.
• Wexler, D.B., Putting mental health into mental health law: therapeutic jurisprudence. Behavioral Science and the Law 16 (1992), 27–38.
• Wexler, D.B. (2015). Presentación. En F. Fariña y E. Pillado (Coords.), Mediación familiar. Una nueva visión de la gestión y resolución de conflictos familiares desde la justicia terapéutica (pp. 13-14). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
• Wexler, D.B., Winick, B.J., Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. 1996, Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC.
• Winick, B.J., Wexler, D.B., Drug treatment court: therapeutic jurisprudence applied. Winick, B.J., Wexler, D.B., (eds.) Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Courts, 2003, Carolina Academic Press, Durham, NC, 105–109.
• Yannakoulia, M., Papanikolaou, K., Hatzopoulou, I., Efstathiou, E., Papoutsakis, C., Dedoussis, G., Association Between Family Divorce and Children's BMI and Meal Patterns: The GENDAI Study. Obesity 16 (2008), 1382–1387.