El difícil camino hacia una tributación internacional justa de la economía digitalel nuevo nexo basado en una presencia económica significativa y otras alternativas para afrontar los retos de la e-conomy en la fiscalidad directa del siglo xxi

  1. SORAYA RODRÍGUEZ LOSADA
Revista:
Documentos - Instituto de Estudios Fiscales

ISSN: 1578-0244

Ano de publicación: 2019

Título do exemplar: Residencia fiscal : problemática y cuestiones actuales

Número: 6

Tipo: Documento de traballo

Outras publicacións en: Documentos - Instituto de Estudios Fiscales

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AUERBACH, A. J., DEVEREUX, M. P., KEEN, M. y VELLA, J. (2017): “Destination-based cash flow taxation”, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper Series, WP 17/01.
  • AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT (2009): “Australia’s digital economy: future directions”. Final report. Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy. www.digecon.info/docs/0098.pdf
  • AVI-YONAH, R. (1997): “International taxation of electronic commerce”, Tax Law Review, Vol. 52.
  • AVI-YONAH, R. (2013): “Virtual PE: International taxation and the Fairness Act”, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Paper No. 328. April.
  • AVI-YONAH, R. y HALABI, O. (2014): “A Model Treaty for the Age of BEPS”, Law & Economics Working Papers. Paper No. 103. http://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/103
  • BÁEZ MORENO, A. (2015): “The taxation of technical services under the United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention: a rushed –yet appropriate- proposal for (developing) countries?” World Tax Journal, vol. 7, no. 3.
  • BÁEZ MORENO, A. y BRAUNER, Y. (2015): “Withholding taxes in the service of BEPS Action 1: Address the tax challenges of the digital economy”, Working Papers IBFD. 2 February 2015
  • BLUM, D. W. (2015): “Permanent establishment and Action 1 on the Digital Economy of the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Initiative – the nexus criterion redefined?”, Bulletin for International Taxation, vol. 69, issues 6/7.
  • COCKFIELD, A. J. (2002): “Designing tax policy for the digital biosphere: how the Internet is changing tax laws”, Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 34.
  • COCKFIELD, A. J.; HELLERSTEIN, W.; MILLAR, R. y WAERZEGGERS, C. (2013): Taxing global digital commerce, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  • COHEN, S.; DE LONG, B. y ZYSMAN, J. (2000): “Tools for thought: what is new and important about the economy?” Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper 138.
  • COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2014): Commission Expert Group on Taxation of the Digital Economy Report. 28 May. http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/good_governance_ma tters/digital/report_digital_economy.pdf
  • COMITÉ DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS (2017a): Revised Commentary on Article 12A – fees for technical services. Fourteenth session, Agenda item 3(a): Issues related to the updating of the United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries. (Committee of Experts E/C 18/2017/CRP.1 March).
  • COMITÉ DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS (2017b): The taxation of fees for technical, managerial and consultancy services in the digital economy with respect to Art. 12A of the 2017 UN Model. Fifteenth session, Agenda item 5(c)(ix): Tax consequences of the digitalized economy. (Committee of Experts E/C.18/2017/CRP.23 - 10 October)
  • DESAI, P. y GORADIA, S. (2014): “General Report”, Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International, Volume 99a: Crossborder outsourcing –issues, strategies and solutions, 68th Congress of the International Fiscal Association. Rotterdam: Sdu Uitgevers.
  • DEVEREUX, M. P. y DE LA FERIA, R. (2014): “Designing and implementing a destination-based corporate tax”, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper Series, WP 14/17.
  • DEVEREUX, M. P. y VELLA, J. (2017): “Implications of digitalization for international corporate tax reform”, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper Series, WP 17/07.
  • HINNEKENS, L. (1998): “Looking for an appropriate jurisdictional framework for source-state taxation of international electronic commerce in the twenty-first century”, Intertax, Vol. 26 (Issues 6-7)
  • HONGLER, P. y PISTONE, P. (2015): “Blueprints for a new PE nexus to tax business income in the era of the digital economy”, Working Papers IBFD. 20 January 2015.
  • KEMMEREN, E.C.C.M. (2010): “Legal and economic principles support an origin and import neutrality-based over a residence and export neutrality-based tax treaty policy”. En: Lang, M., Pistone, P., Schuch, J., Staringer, C., Storch, A., Zagler, M., (eds.), Tax treaties: building bridges between law and economics, Amsterdam: IBFD.
  • LAHIRI, A. K.; RAY, G. y SENGUPTA, D. P. (2017): “Equalisation Levy”. Brookings India Working Paper, No. 1.
  • MINISTRY OF FINANCE (2016): Proposal for equalization levy on specified transactions (Report of the Committee on Taxation of E-Commerce). February 2016. Prepared by the Committee on Taxation of ECommerce formed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. Government of India.
  • OCDE (2000): Clarification on the application of the Permanent Establishment definition in e-commerce: changes to the Commentary on the Model Tax Convention on Article 5.
  • OCDE (2005): Are the current treaty rules for taxing business profits appropriate for e-commerce? Final Report.
  • OCDE (2011): OECD Guide to measuring the information society. 2011. OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/10.1787/9789264113541-en
  • OCDE (2012): The digital economy. (DAF/COMP(2012)22). www.oecd.org/daf/competition/The-DigitalEconomy-2012.pdf
  • OCDE (2013): Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264202719-en
  • OCDE (2015a.): Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, Action 1 - 2015 Final Report.
  • OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264241046-en
  • OCDE (2015b): Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status, Action 7 - 2015 Final Report. OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264241220-en
  • OLBERT, M. y SPENGEL, C. (2017): “International taxation in the digital economy: challenge accepted?” World Tax Journal, February.
  • PINTO, D. (2006): “The need to reconceptualise the permanent establishment threshold”, Bulletin for International Taxation, vol. 60, issue 7.
  • PRIEM, R. L. (2007): “A consumer perspective on value creation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1 . SASSEVILLE, J. y SKAAR, A. (2009): “General Report: Is there a permanent establishment? Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International by the International Fiscal Association. 63er Congress of the International Fiscal Association, vol. 94a, Vancouver.
  • SKAAR, A. (1991): Permanent establishment: erosion of a tax treaty principle. Series of International Taxation. Deventer-Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
  • SPRAGUE, G. D. y HERSEY, R. (2003): “Permanent establishments and Internet-enabled enterprises: the physical presence and contract concluding dependent agent tests”, Georgia Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 1.
  • TAPSCOTT, D. (1994): The digital economy. Promise and Peril in the age of networked intelligence, EE.UU: McGraw-Hill.
  • VARANASI, S. y NAGAPPAN, M. (2016): “Financial Budget for 2016-2017: has India put its BEPS foot forward?”, Intertax, vol. 44, issue 6 & 7.