Análisis de los stakeholdersuna reflexión sobre el poder de influencia en la oraganización

Referencias bibliográficas

• ACKOFF, R. L. (1974), Redesigning the future, Nueva York: JohnWiley & Sons.
• ARGENTI, J. (1997), “Stakeholders: the case against”, International Journal of Strategic Management: Long Range Planning, 30 (3): 442-445.
• CARROLL, A. (1993), Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management, 3ª edición, Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.
• CLARKSON, M. (1995), “A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 92-117.
• DAAKE, D. y WILLIAM, P. (2000), “Understanding stakeholder power and influence gaps in a health care organization: an empirical study”, Health Care Manage Rev, 25 (3): 94-107.
• DILL, W. (1976), “Public participation in corporate planning: strategic management in a Kibizter s world”, en H. I. ANSOFF; R. R. DECLERCK; y R. L.
• HAYES (eds.), From strategy planning to strategic management, pp. 125-136, Nueva York: John Wiley and Sons.
• DONALDSON, T. y PRESTON, L. (1995), “The stakeholders theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91.
• ELIAS, A.A. y CAVANA, R.Y. (2000), “Stakeholder analysis for systems thinking and modelling”, The 35th Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society of New Zealand, 1-2 diciembre, Victoria University of Wellington, Nueva Zelanda.
• EVAN, W.M. y FREEMAN, R.E. (1988), “A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism”, Ethical Theory and Business, 75-93.
• FOTTLER, M. (1987), “Health care organizational performance: present and future research”, en J. BLAIR y J. HUNT (eds.), Yearly Review of Management. Special issue of Journal of Management, 12 (2): 179-203.
• FREEMAN, E. (1984), Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston: Printman Press.
• – (1999), “Divergent stakeholder theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 233-236.
• FROOMAN, J. (1999), “Stakeholders influence strategies”, Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 191-205.
• HARRISON, J. y FREEMAN, E. (1999), “Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: empirical evidence and theorical perspectives”, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 479-487.
• HILL, C. y JONES, T. (1992), “Stakeholder-agency theory”, Journal of Management Studies, 29 (2): 131-154.
• HILLMAN, A. y KEIM, G. (2001), “Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?”, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125-139.
• JAWAHAR, I.M. y MCLAUGHLIN, G. L. (2001), “Toward a descriptive stakeholders theory: an organizational life cycle approach”, Academy of Management Review, 26 (3): 397-414.
• JOHNSON, G. y SCHOLES, K. (2000), Dirección estratégica, Madrid: Prentice Hall.
• JONES, T. (1980), “Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined”, California Management Review, 20: 379-403.
• – (1995), “Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics”, Academy of Management Review, 20 (2): 404-437.
• JONES, T.M.; WICKS, A.C.; y, FREEMAN, E. (2002), “Stakeholder theory: the state of the art”, en N. BOWIE (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics, Parte I, 19-37.
• KALER, J. (2002), “Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification”, Journal of Business Ethics, 39: 91-99.
• LANGTRY, B. (1994), “Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (4): 431-443.
• MITCHELL, R.; AGLE, B. y WOOD, D. (1997), “Toward a theory stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 856-886.
• PFEFFER, J. y SALANCIK, G. (1978), The external control of organization: a resource dependence perspective, Nueva York: Happer and Row.
• POLONSKY, M. J. (1995), “Incorporating the natural environment in corporate strategy: a stakeholder approach”, The Journal of Business Strategies, 12 (2): 151-168.
• POST, J.; PRESTON, L. E.; y, SACHS, S. (2002), Redefining corporation: stakeholder management and organizational wealth, editorial Hardcover.
• ROWLEY, T. y MOLDOVEANU, M. (2003), “When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization”, Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 204-219.
• ROWLEY, T.J. (1997), “Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences”, Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 887-910.
• SAVAGE, G.; NIX, T.; WHITEHEAD, C. y BLAIR, J. (1991), “Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders”, Academy of Management Executive, 5 (2): 61-75.
• SCHOLES, E. y CLUTTERBUCK, D. (1998), “Communication with stakeholders: an integrated approach”, International Journal of Strategic Management: Long Range Planning, 31 (2): 227-238.
• STARIK, M. (1994), “The Toronto conference: reflections on stakeholder theory”, Business & Society, 33 (1): 82-131.
• STEADMAN, M.; ZIMMERER, T.; y GREEN, R. (1995), “Pressures from stakeholders hit Japanese companies”, International Journal of Strategic Management: Long Range Planning, 28 (6): 29-37.
• THOMPSON, J. (1967), Organizations in action, Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
• THOMPSON, J.K., WARTICK, S. L, y. SMITH H. L. (1991), “Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: implications for a research agenda in small business”, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12: 207-230.
• VERSCHOOR, C. (2001), “Ethical behaviour brings tangible benefits of organizations”, Strategic Finance, 82 (11): 20-22.
• WADDOCK, S. y GRAVES, S. (1997), “Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations”, Business & Society, 36 (3): 250-279.
• WHEELER, D. y SILLANPÄÄ, M. (1998), “Including the stakeholders: the business case”, International Journal of Strategic Management: Long Range Planning, 31(2): 201-210.