Efectos sociales de la contaminación acústicauna aplicación de valoración al transporte ferroviario

  1. Durán Medraño, Roi
  2. Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé
Revista:
Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

ISSN: 0210-1173

Ano de publicación: 2009

Número: 191

Páxinas: 27-42

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics

Resumo

El artículo describe una aplicación de valoración contingente para analizar pérdidas de bienestar causadas por el ruido en el trazado ferroviario que conecta Galicia con Portugal. Como objetivos adicionales, se analiza el papel de la especificación temporal asociada al medio de pago en la valoración, así como el funcionamiento de las escalas de percepción de molestia internacionalmente aceptadas. Para el análisis de datos se han utilizado modelos paramétricos, no paramétricos y Spike. Los resultados muestran una disposición al pago positiva de en torno a 97/hogar. Se observa que la correcta delimitación del período temporal en el vehículo de pago juega un papel fundamental en la calidad de los resultados y que los individuos perciben las molestias en una escala más simple respecto a la de uso internacional.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., y H. Schuman (1993), Report to the Na-tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation, Federal Register, 58, 4602-4614.
  • Ayer, M., Brunk, H. D. Ewing, D. y Silverman, E. (1955), An empirical distribution for sampling with incomplete information, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 641-647.
  • Barreiro, J., Sanchez, M. y M. Viladrich-Grau (2005), How Much are People Willing to Pay for Si-lence? A Contingent Valuation Study. Applied Economics, 37(1), 1233-1246.
  • Bjorner, T. B. (2004), Combining Socio-Acoustic and Contingent Valuation Surveys to Value Noise Reduction. Transportation Research: Part D: Transport and Environment, 9, 341-356.
  • Comisio´n Europea (2002), Position paper on Dose-Response relationships beetween transportation noise and annoyance. EU noise expert network, Oficina de publicaciones oficiales de las Comuni-dades Europeas, Luxemburgo.
  • Del Saz Salazar (2004), Tra´fico rodado y efectos externos: valoracio´n econo´mica del ruido, Ekonomiaz, 57(3), 46-67
  • Hanemann, W. M. (1984), Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332-341.
  • Hanemann, W. M. y B. Kristro¨m (1995), Preference uncertainty, optimal designs and spikes, in: Jo-hansson P-O, Kristro¨m B, Ma¨ler (eds) Current issues in environmental economics. Manchester Uni-versity press, Manchester.
  • Hawkins, R. (1999), Review of Studies on External Costs of Noise. Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). Environment Protection Economics Division. London.
  • HEATCO (2006). Deliverable 4: Economic values for key impacts valued in stated preference studies. Funded by the 6th Framework Programme. Co-ordinator. University of Stuttgart, Institute of Ener-gy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy (IER), Germany.
  • ISO/TS 15666 (2003), Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socioeconomic surveys
  • Kahneman, D. y J. Knetch (1992), Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal Of Environmental Economics And Management, 22, 57-70.
  • Krinsky, I. y A. Robb (1986), On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68, pp 715-719.
  • Kristro¨m, B. (1990), A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete re-sponse valuation studies. Land Economics, 66, 135-139.
  • Kristro¨m, B. (1997), Spike models in contingent valuation models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1013-1023.
  • Lambert, J. Poisson, F. y P. Champelovier (2001), Valuing benefits of road traffic abatement pro-gramme: a contingent valuation survey. INRETS.
  • Mitchell, R. C. y R. T. Carson (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the future, Washington D. C.
  • Morrison, M. D., Blamey, R. K. y J. W. Bennett (2000) Minimizing Payment Vehicle Bias in Contin-gent Valuation Studies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 16, 407-422.
  • Navrud, S. (2002) The state of the art on economic valuation of noise. Final Report to European Commission DG Environment.
  • Nunes, P.A.D.L. y C. M. Travisi (2006) Comparing Tax and Tax Reallocations Payments in Financ-ing Rail Noise Abatement Programs: Results from a CE valuation study in Italy. Nota di Lavoro 95.2006 Fundazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  • Pachiaudi, G. (1984) Le bruit des trens. Aspects physiques et psychosociologiques. INRETS.
  • Pommerehne, W. W. (1988) Measuring Environmental Benefits: A Comparison of Hedonic Technique and Contingent Valuation, in by Dieter Bos, D. M. Rose and C. Seidl (eds.): Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
  • Sælensminde, K. (1999). Stated Choice Valuation of Urban Traffic Air Pollution and Noise. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 4(1), 13-27.
  • Soguel, N. (1994) Evaluation Monetaire des Atteinties a l'environment: une E´tude Hedoniste et Contingente Suˆr l'impact des Transports. Imprimiere de l Evolve, SA. Neuchatel.
  • Stevens, T. H., Decoteau N. E. y C. E. Willis (1997), Sensitivity of Contingent Valuation to Alterna-tive Payment Schedules, Land Economics, 73, pp 140-148.
  • Strand, J. y M. Vagnes, (2001), The Relationship between Property Values and Railroad Proximity: A Study Based on Hedonic Prices and Real Estate Brokers Appraisals, Transportation, 28(2), 137-156.
  • Vainio, M. (1995) Traffic noise and air pollution: Valuation of externalities with the hedonic price and contingent valuation methods, PhD Thesis, School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki.
  • WHO (2004), Noise effects and morbidity, Final Report of the WHO Large Analysis and Review of European housing and health Status (LARES).
Fonte de datos: Dialnet