La tutoría en el Practicumrevisión de la literatura

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abell, S., Dillon, D., Hopkins, C., Mcinerney, W. y O'brien, D. (1995). Somebody to count on': mentor/intern relationships in a beginning teacher internship program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(2), 173-188.
• Anderson, J. (2006). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6a. ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
• Andrew, J., Hobson, A., Ashby, P., Malderez, A. y Tomlinson, P. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 207-216.
• Barquín, J. (2002). La tutorización de las prácticas y la socialización del futuro profesorado. Revista de Educación, 327, 267-283.
• Bodoczky, C. y Malderezl, A. (1997). The INSET Impact of a Mentoring Course. En D. Hayes (Ed.), In-Service Teacher Development: International Perspectives. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
• Brady, L. (1993). Peer assistance in the professional development of principals. Curriculum and Teaching, 8, 91-98.
• Brown, J., Collins, A. y Duguip, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
• Bullough, R., Jr. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: school-based teacher educators and teacher educator identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 143-155.
• Bullough, R., Jr. y Draper, R. (2004). Mentoring and the emotions. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 30(3), 271-288.
• Bush, T. y Coleman, M. (1995). Professional development of heads: The role of mentoring. Journal of Educational Administration, 33, 60-73.
• Cahill, H. A. (1996). A qualitative analysis of student nurses' experiences of mentorship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 791-799.
• Carter, M. y Francis, R. (2001). Mentoring and beginning teachers' workplace learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 249-262.
• Cid, A. (2003). Repensar el Practicum. El caso del título de maestro de la Universidad de Vigo. En L. Iglesias, M. Zabalza, A. Cid y M. Raposo (Coord).Desarrollo de competencias personales y profesionales en el Practicum. Publicación en CD-ROM.
• Cid, A. (2009). Observación y análisis de los procesos de aula en la universidad: Revisión del modelo. En A. Cid (Ed.), Coreografías didácticas en la Universidad: Experiencias e innovaciones (pp. 7-24). Santiago de Compostela: Andavira.
• Cid, A. y Ocampo, C. I. (2006). Funciones tutoriales en el Practicum correspondientesal actual plan de estudios de Magisterio de la Universidad de Vigo. Revista de Educación, 340, 445-472.
• Cid, A (2007). Funciones tutoriales en el Practicum de Psicopedagogía en la Universidad de Vigo: percepción de los estudiantes actuales. Revista de Educación, 344, 285-307.
• Clark, A. & Collins, S. (2007). Complexity science and student teacher supervision. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, pp. 160-172.
• Cochran-Smith, M. & Zeichner, K. (Eds). (2005). Studying teacher education. New York: Routledge.
• Collinson, V., Kozina, E., Lin, Yk., Ling, L., Matheson, I., Newcombe, L. y Zogla, I. (2009). Professional development for teachers: A world of change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 3-19.
• Council of European Union (2007). Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 15 November 2007, on Improving the Quality of Teacher Education. Official Journal of the European Union, 12.12.2007, C 300/6-9.
• Crasborn, F., Hennisson, P., Brouwer, N., Korthagen, F. y Bergen, T. (2008). Promoting versatility in mentor teachers' use of supervisory skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 499-514.
• Creswell, J. R. (1994) Research design. Qualitative quantitative approaches. Londres: Safe.
• Crosby, F. (1999). The developing literature on developmental relationships. En A. Murrell, F. Crosby y R. Ely (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 3-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: lessons from exemplary programmes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Davies, M., Brady, M., Roger, E. y Wall, P. (1999). Mentors and school-based partnership: ingredients for professional growth. Action in Teacher Education, 21(1), 85-96.
• Derrick, J. y Dicks, J. (2005). Teaching Practice and Mentoring: The key to effective literacy, language and numeracy teacher training. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.
• Downey, R. G. (1986). Report from the Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
• Doyle, W. (1990). Classroom knowledge as a foundation for teaching. Teachers College Record, 91, 347-360.
• Dunne, E. y Bennett, N. (1997). Mentoring processes in school-based training. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 225-238.
• Eby, L., Mcmanus, S., Simon, S. y Russell, J. (2000). The proteges perspective regarding negative mentoring experiences: The development of a taxonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(1), 1-21.
• Edwards, A. (1998). Mentoring student teachers in primary schools: assisting student teachers to become learners. European Journal of Teacher Education,21(1), 47-62.
• Edwards, A. y Collison, J. (1996). Mentoring and developing practice in primaryschools. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
• Ehrich, L.C. y Hansford, B. C. (1999). Mentoring: Pros and cons for HRM. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 37(3), 92-107.
• Ehrich, L., Tennent, L. y Hansford, B. (2002). A Review of Mentoring in Education:Some Lessons for Nursing. Contemporary Nurse, 12(3), 253-264.
• Enrich, L., Hansford, B, y Tennet, L. (2004). Formal Mentoring Programs in Education and Other Professions: A Review of the Literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 518-540.
• Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols.
• Enomoto, E., Gardiner, M. y Grogan, M. (2002). Mentoring women in educational leadership. En F. Kochan (Ed.), The organizational and human dimensions of successful mentoring programs and relationships (pp. 207-220). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
• European Commission (2007). Improving the quality of teacher education. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament (3rd August).
• Evans, L. y Abbott, I. (1997). Developing as mentors in school-based teacher training. Teacher Development, 1(1), 135-148.
• Everstson, C. y Smithey, M. (2000). Mentoring effects on protéges' classroom practice:an experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 294-304.
• Farrell, T. (2008). 'Here is the book, go and teach': ELT Practicum support. RELC J. 39, 226-241.
• Fensternacher, G. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: three aspects. En M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3a ed). (pp. 37-49) New York: Macmillan.
• Fensternacher, G (1994). The place of practical arguments in the education of teachers. En V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 23-42). NY: Teachers College Press.
• Foster, R. (1999). School-based initial teacher training in England and France: trainee teachers' perspectives compared. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. 7(2), 131-143.
• Franke, A. y Dahlgren, L. (1996). Conceptions of mentoring: an empirical study of conceptions of mentoring during the school-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 627-641.
• Gibbs, S. (1999). The usefulness of theory: a case study in evaluating formal mentoring schemes. Human Relations, 52(8), 1055-1075.
• Gilflores, J. (1994). Análisis de datos cualitativos. Aplicaciones a la investigación educativa. Barcelona: PPU.
• Gough, D. y Elbourne, D. (2002). Systematic research synthesis to inform policy, practice and democratic debate. Social Policy and Society, 1(3), 225-236.
• Graham, P. (1997). Tensions in the mentor teacher-student teacher relationship: creating productive sites for learning within a high school English teacher education program'. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(5), 513-527.
• Greeno, J., Collins, A. y Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. En D. Berliner y R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
• Grimmett, P. P. y Mackinnon, A. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. En G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education, 18 (pp. 385-345). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
• Grossman, P. y Mcdonald, M. (2008). Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education. American Educational Research Journal.45(1),184-205.
• Guerrero, M y López, M. (2006). El prácticum en la formación de pedagogos ante la convergencia europea. Algunas reflexiones y propuestas de mejora. Revista de Educación, 341, 517-552.
• Hammersley, M. (1996). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. En J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 159-174). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
• Hanson, B. (1996). Participants' personal perceptions of mentoring. Mentoring and Tutoring, 4, 53-64.
• Hardy, C. A. (1999). Preservice teachers' perceptions of learning to teach in a predominantly school-based teacher education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 175-198.
• Healy, C. (1997). Anoperational definition of mentoring. En H. T. Frierson (Ed.), Diversity in higher education (pp. 9-22). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
• Hagger, H. y Mcintyre, D. (2006). Learning teaching from teachers: Realising the potential of school-based teacher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• Healy, C. y Welchert, A. (1990). Mentoring relations: a definition to advance research and practice. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 17-21.
• Henderson, D. (1985). Enlightened mentoring: a characteristic of public management professionalism. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 475-485.
• Hobson, A., Ashby, P., Malderez, A. y Tomlinson, P. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't. Teaching and Teacher Education 25, 207-216
• Hobson, A., Malderez, A., Tracey, L., et al. (2007). Newly qualified teachers' experiences of their first year of teaching: Findings from phase III of the becoming a teacher project. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF).
• Holmes, E. W. (1991, February). Journaling: A lens for looking at a mentor and a beginning teacher working together. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston.
• Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behaviour. New York: Harcourt Brace.
• Hurley, D. (1988). The mentor mystique. Psychology Today, 22(5), 38-38, 42-44.
• I'anson, J., Rodrigues, S. y Wilson, G. (2003). Mirrors, reflections and refractions: The contribution of microteaching to reflective practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 189-199.
• Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505-532.
• Johnson, S. (2004). Finders and keepers. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
• Johnson, S., Berg, J. y Donaldson, M. (2005). Who stays in teaching and why; a review of the literature on teacher retention. The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
• Jones, M. (2001). Mentors' perceptions of their roles in school-based teacher training in England and Germany. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27 (1), pp. 65-94.
• Kram, K. & Isabella, L. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 110-132.
• Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: the role of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2-7.
• Latorre, M. J. (2007). El potencial for mativo del Practicum: cambio en las creencias que sobre la enseñanza práctica poseen los futuros maestros. Revista de Educación, 343, 249-273.
• Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge in teaching. Educational Researcher, 19 (2), 18-25.
• Leinhardt, G., Young, K. y Merriman, J. (1995). Integrating professional knowledge: the theory of practice and the practice of theory. Learning and Instruction,5, 401-408.
• Levinson, D., Darrow, C., Klein, E., Levinson, M. y Mckee, B (1978). The seasons of a man's life. Ballantine Books: New York.
• Lindgren, U. (2005). Experiences of beginning teachers in a school-based mentoring programme Sweden. Educational Studies, 31(3), 251-263.
• Liston, D., Whitcomb, J. y Borko, H. (2006). Too little or too much: teacher preparation and the first years of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(4), 35-358.
• Long, J. (1997). The dark side of mentoring. Australian Educational Researcher,24(2), 115-133.
• López-Real, F. y Kwan, T. (2005). Mentors' perceptions of their own professional development during mentoring. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(1), 15-24.
• Madison, J., Watson, K. & Knight, B. (1994). Mentors and preceptors in the nursing profession. Contemporary Nurse, 3, 121-126.
• Marable, M. & Raimondi, S. (2007). Teachers' perceptions of what was most (and least) supportive during their first year of teaching. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(1), 25-37.
• Martínez, M. C. (2006). Funciones y disfunciones del papel del maestro-tutor en las prácticas de enseñanza. Campo Abierto, 25 (2), 193-210.
• Mcintyre, D. y Hagger, H. (1996). Mentors in schools: Developing the profession of teaching. London: David Fulton.
• Mertz, N. T. (2004). What's a Mentor, Anyway? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 541-560.
• Molina, E. (2008). Analysis of the system op Practicum in Spanish universities. European Journal of Teacher Educatión, 31(4), 339-366.
• Molina, E. (Dir.), Iranzo, P., Llópez, M. y Molina, A. (2008). Procedimientos de análisis, evaluación y mejora de la formación práctica. Revista de Educación, 346, 335-361.
• Moor, H., Halsey, K., Jones, M., et al. (2005). Professional development for teachers early in their careers: An evaluation of the early professional development pilot scheme. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
• Morton-Cooper, A. y Palmer, A. (1993). Mentoring and preceptorship: a guide to support roles in clinical practice. Boston: Blackwell Science.
• Oakley, A. (2003). Research evidence, knowledge management and educational practice: early lessons from a systematic approach. London Review of Education, 1(1), 21-33.
• Orland, L. (2001). Reading a mentoring situation: one aspect of learning to mentor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 75-88.
• Pérez, Ma. (2005). ¿Se pueden determinar las funciones de supervisor universitario? Revista de Investigación Educativa, 23(2), 315-332.
• Rajuan, M., Douwe, B. y Verloop, N. (2007). The role of the cooperating teacher: bridging the gap between the expectations of cooperating teachers and student teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(3), 223-242.
• Rippon, J. H. y Martin, M. (2006). What makes a good induction supporter? Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 84-99.
• Roehring, A. D., Bohn, C. M., Turner, J. E. y Pressley, M. (2008). Mentoring beginning primary teachers for exemplary teaching practices. Teaching andTeacher Education, 24, 684-702.
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. En J. V. Wertsch,P. del Rio, y A. Álvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
• Schön, D. (1983). El profesional reflexivo: cómo piensan los profesionales cuando actúan. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Schön, D (1987). La formación de profesionales reflexivos: hacia un nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Madrid. Paidós/MEC
• Simpson, T., Hastings, W. y Hill, B. (2007). 'I knew that she was watching me': the professional benefits of mentoring. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 481-498.
• Smith, T. & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681-714.
• Stanulis, R. & Weaver, D. (1998). Teacher as mentor, teacher as learner. The Teacher Educator, 34(2), 134-143.
• Su, J. (1992). Sources of influence in preservice teacher socialization. Journal of Education for Teaching, 18(3), 239-258.
• Tashankkori, A. y Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Tharp, R. y Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
• Tomlinson, P. (1998). Teacher education and psychologies of skill. En D. Shorrksoc-Taylor (Ed.), Directions in educational psychology. London: Whurr Publishers.
• Valencic, M. & Vogrinc, J. (2007). A mentor's aid in developing the competences of teacher trainees. Educational Studies, 33(4), 373-384.
• Vance, C. y Olson, R. (1991). Mentorship. Annual review of nursing research, 9, 175-200.
• Wang, J. y Odell, S. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standardsbased reform: a critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546.
• Wertsch, J. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. En L. Resnick, J. Levine, y S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Williams, A. y Prestage, S. (2002). The induction tutor: mentor, manager or both? Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 1, 35-45.
• Wilson, G. & I'anson, J. (2006). Reframing the Practicum: Constructing performative space in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 353-361.
• Yeomans, R. & Sampson, J. (Eds.). (1994). Mentorship in the primary school. London: Falmer Press.
• Yusko, B. & Feiman, S. (2008). Embracing contraries: combining assistance and assessment in new teacher induction. Teachers College Record, 110(7), 1-12.
• Zabalza, M. (2006). El Practicum y la formación del profesorado: balance y propuesta para las nuevas titulaciones. En J. M. Escuedero (Coord.), La mejora de la educación y la formación del profesorado Políticas y prácticas. (pp. 309-330). Barcelona: Octaedro.
• Zabalza, M (2003). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. Madrid: Narcea.
• Zabalza, M. y Cid, A. (1998). El tutor de prácticas: un perfil profesional. En M. A. Zabalza (Ed.), Los tutores en el Practicum. Funciones, formación, compromise institucional (pp. 17-63). Pontevedra: Exma. Diputación de Pontevedra.
• Zabalza, M. y Cid, A (2005). Elementos nucleares del Practicum. En M. Raposo, A. Cid, M. Sanmamed et al. (coord.), El Practicum en el nuevo contexto del espacio europeo de educación superior. Adenda (pp. 5-22). Santiago de Compostela: ImprentaUniversitaria.
• Zeichner, K. (1993). A Formaçao Reflexiva de profesores: Ideas e Prácticas. Lisboa. Educa.
• Zeichner, K (1994). Conceptions of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. En G. Harvard, P. y Hodk (Eds.), Action and reflection in teacher education (pp. 15-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the Connections Between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College-and University-Based. Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-9.