Conocimiento tecnológico, capacidad de innovación y desempeño innovadorel rol moderador del ambiente interno de la empresa

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahuja, G., Katila, R., 2001. Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study. Strategic Management Journal 22, 197-220.
• Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., Chiva, R., 2006. A Measurement Scale for Product Innovation Performance. European Journal of Innovation Management 9, 333-346.
• Ancori, B., Bureth, A., Cohendet, P., 2000. The Economics of Knowledge: The Debate about Codification and Tacit Knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 255-287.
• Arévalo Tomé, R., Quintás Corredoira, M.A., Urgal González, B., 2009. Los Efectos de la Actividad Innovadora para la Empresa Espa{ogonek} nola. Una Propuesta de Medición y Estimación de los Factores Explicativos. In: XIX Congreso Nacional de ACEDE, Toledo.
• Balconi, M., 2002. Tacitness, Codification of Technological Knowledge and the Organisation of Industry. Research Policy 31, 357-379.
• Barney, J., 1991. Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99-120.
• Barney, J.B., Arikan, A.M., 2001. The Resource-based View: Origins and Implications. In: Hitt, M.A., Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Ed. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 124-188.
• Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., 1986. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173-1182.
• Beneito, P., 2003. Choosing among Alternative Technological Strategies: An Empirical Analysis of Formal Sources of Innovation. Research Policy 32, 693-713.
• Beneito, P., 2006. The Innovative Performance of in House and Contracted R&D in Terms of Patents and Utility Models. Research Policy 35, 502-517.
• Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L., 2003. Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review 28, 238-256.
• Bierly, P., Chakrabarti, A., 1996. Generic Knowledge Strategies in the US Pharmaceutical Industry. Strategic Management Journal 17, 123-135.
• Birchall, D.W., Tovstiga, G., 2006. Innovation Performance Measurement: Expert vs Practitioner Views. In: PICMET 2006 proceedings, 9-13 July, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Brown, S., Eisenhardt, K.M., 1995. Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. Academy ofManagement Review 20, 343-378.
• Brusoni, S., Marsili, O., Salter, A., 2005. The Role of Codified Sources of Knowledge in Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 15, 211-231.
• Chang, Y., 2003. Benefits of Co-operation on Innovative Performance: Evidence from Integrated Circuits and Biotechnology Firms in the UK and Taiwan. R&D Management 33, 425-437.
• Chen, Y., Lin, M.J., Chang, Ch., 2006. The Influence of Intellectual Capital on New Product Development Performance -The Manufacturing Companies of Taiwan as an Example. Total Quality Management 17, 1323-1339.
• Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128-152.
• Cohendet, P., Meyer-Krahmer, F., 2001. The Theoretical and Policy Implications of Knowledge Codification. Research Policy 30, 1563-1591.
• Daellenbach, U.S., McCarthy, A.M., Schoenecker, T.S., 1999. Commitment to Innovation: The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics. R&D Management 29, 199-208.
• Damanpour, F., 1992. Organizational Size and Innovation. Organization Studies 13, 375-402.
• De Brentani, U., Kleinschmidt, E.J., 2004. Corporate Culture and Commitment: Impact on Performance of International New Product Development Programs. Journal Production Innovation Management 21, 309-333.
• De Carolis, D.M., 2003. Competencies and Imitability in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of Their Relationship with Firm Performance. Journal of Management 29, 27-50.
• De Carolis, D.M., Deeds, D.L., 1999. The Impact of Stocks and Flows of Organizational Knowledge on Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Management Journal 20, 953-968.
• De Propris, L., 2000. Innovation and Inter-firm Cooperation: The Case of the West Midlands. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 9, 421-446.
• Díaz Díaz, N.L., Aguiar Díaz, I., De Saá Pérez, P., 2006. El Conocimiento Organizativo Tecnológico y la Capacidad de Innovación. Evidencia para la Empresa Industrial Espa{ogonek} nola. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 27, 33-59.
• Dosi, G., 1988. Sources, Procedures, and Micronomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature XXXI, 1120-1171.
• Edmondson, A., Winslow, A., Bohmer, R., Pisano, G., 2003. Learning How and Learning What: Effect of Tacit and Codified Knowledge of Performance Improvement Following Technologic Adoptions. Decision Science 34, 197-223.
• Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A., 2000. Dynamic Capabilities: What are They? Strategic Management Journal 21, 1105-1121.
• Fey, C.F., Birkinshaw, J., 2005. External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance. Journal of Management 31, 597-621.
• Frishammar, J, Hörte, S.A., 2005. Managing External Information in Manufacturing Firms: The Impact on Innovation Performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 22, 251-266.
• Galunic, D.C., Rodan, S., 1998. Resources Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential form Schumpeterian Innovation. Strategic Management Journal 19, 1193-1201.
• García-Muiña, F.E., Pelechano Barahona, E., Navas-López, J.E., 2007. Knowledge Codification and Technological Innovation Success: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Biotech Companies. In: PICMET 2007 proceedings, 5-9 August, Portland, Oregon.
• Gilder, G., 1988. The Revitalization of Everything: TheLawof the Microcosm. Harvard Business Review 66, 49-61.
• Gopalakrishnan, S., Bierly, P., 2001. Analyzing Innovation Adoption Using a Knowledge-based Approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 18, 107-130.
• Grant, R.M., 1991. The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review 33, 114-135.
• Grant, R.M., 1996. Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 109-122.
• Grant, R.M., Baden-Fuller, 2004. A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41, 61-84.
• Gupta, A.K., Singhal, A., 1993. Managing Human Resources for Innovation and Creativity. Research Technology Management 36, 41-48.
• Haour, G., 1992. Stretching the Knowledge Base of the Enterprise through Contract Research. R&D Management 22, 177-182.
• Henderson, R., Cockburn, I., 1994. Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Strategic Management Journal 15, 63-84.
• Hill, C.W.L., Snell, S.A., 1988. External Control, Corporate Strategy, and Firm Performance in Research-Intensive Industries. Strategic Management Journal 9, 577-590.
• Hill, C.W.L., Snell, S.A., 1989. Effects of Ownership Structure and Control on Corporate Productivity. Academy of Management Journal 32, 25-46.
• Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E., Ireland, R.D., Harrison, J.S., 1991. Effects of Acquisitions on R&D Inputs and Outputs. Academy of Management Journal 34, 693-706.
• Howells, J., 1999. Research and Technology Outsourcing. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 11, 17-29.
• Howells, J., Gagliardi, D., Malik, K., 2008. The Growth and Management of R&D Ourtsourcing: Evidence from UK Pharmaceuticals. R&D Management 38, 205-219.
• Hundley, G., Jacobson, C.K., Seung, H.P., 1996. Effects of Profitability and Liquidity on R&D Intensity. Academy of Management Journal 39, 1659-1674.
• Hurley, R.F., Hult, G.T., 1998. Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing 62, 42-54.
• Ireland, R.D, Hitt, M.A., Vaidyanath, D., 2002. Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 28, 413-446.
• Jaffe, A.B., Palmer, K., 1997. Environmental Regulation and Innovation:APanel Study. Review of Economics and Statistics 79, 610-619.
• Jiménez-Jiménez, D., Sanz-Valle, R., 2008. Could HRM Support Organizational Innovation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19, 1208-1221.
• Judd, C.M., Kenny, D.A., 1981. Process Analysis: Estimating Mediation in Treatment Evaluation. Evaluation Review 5, 307-321.
• Kessler, E.H., Bierly, P.E., Gopalakrishnan, S., 2000. Internal Vs External Learning in New Product Development: Effects on Speed, Cost and Competitive Advantage. R&D Management 30, 213-223.
• Kleinschmidt, E.J., De Brentani, U., Salomo, S., 2007. Performance of Global New Product Development Programs: A Resource-based View. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 24, 419-441.
• Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1992. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science 3, 383-397.
• Kusunoki, K., Nonaka, I., Nagata, A., 1998. Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings. Organization Science 9, 699-718.
• Lado, A.A., Wilson, M.C., 1994. Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Competency-based Perspective. Academy ofManagement Review 19, 699-727.
• Lai, E.L.-C., Riezman, R., Wang, P., 2009. Outsourcing of Innovation. Economy Theory 38, 485-515.
• Lawson, B., Samson, D., 2001. Developing Innovation Capability in Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach. International Journal of Innovation Management 5, 377-400.
• Lee, M., Son, B., Lee, H., 1996. Measuring R&D Effectiveness in Korean Companies. Research Technology Management 39, 28-32.
• Leonard-Barton, D., 1992. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal 13, 111-125.
• Liebeskind, J.P., 1996. Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 93-108.
• McEvily, S.K., Chakravarthy, B., 2002. The Persistence of Knowledge-based Advantage: An Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 23, 285-305.
• Miller, D.J., Fern, M.J., Cardinal, L.B., 2007. The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation within Diversified Firms. Academy of Management Journal 50, 308-326.
• Muller, D., Judd, C.M., Zerbyt, V.Y., 2005. When Moderation is Mediated and Mediation is Moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89, 852-863.
• Mumford, M.D., 2000. Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation. Human Resource Management Review 10, 313-351.
• Neill, J.D., Pfeiffer, G.M., Young-Ybarra, C.E., 2001. Technology R&D Alliances and Firm Value. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12, 227-237.
• Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Nonaka, I., 1994. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5, 14-37.
• Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., 2005. The Theory of the Knowledge-creating Firm: Subjectivity, Objectivity and Synthesis. Industrial and Corporate Change 14, 419-436.
• Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Nagata, A., 2000. A Firm as a Knowledge-creating Entity: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 1-20.
• OCDE, 1995. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Manual on the Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to S&T. Camberra Manual, OCDE, París, Francia.
• OCDE, 2005. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Olso Manual 3rd, OCDE, París, Francia.
• Patel, P., Pavitt, K., 1997. The Technological Competencies of the World's Largest Firms: Complex and Path-Dependent, But not Much Variety. Research Policy 26, 141-156.
• Pavelin, S., Porter, A., 2008. The Corporate Social Performance Content of Innovation in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 711-725.
• Peteraf, M., 1993. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View. Strategic Management Journal 14, 179-191.
• Phillimore, J., 2001. Schumpeter, Schumacher and the Greening of Technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 13, 23-37.
• Prajogo, D.I., Ahmed, P.K., 2006. Relationships between Innovation Stimulus, Innovation Capacity, and Innovation Performance. R&D Management 36, 499-515.
• Quinn, J.B., 2000. Outsourcing Innovation: The New Engine of Growth. Sloan Management Review 41, 13-28.
• Quintás, M.A., Vázquez, X.H., García, J.M., Caballero, G., 2008. Geographical Amplitude in the International Generation of Technology: Present Situation and Business Determinants. Research Policy 37, 1371-1381.
• Quintás, M.A., Vázquez, X.H., García, J.M., Caballero, G., 2009. International Generation of Technology: An Assessment of Its Intensity, Motives and Facilitators. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21, 743-763.
• Reed, R., DeFillippi, R.J., 1990. Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy Management Review 15, 88-102.
• Rothwell, R., 1991. External Networking and Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Firms in Europe. R&D Management 11, 131-138.
• Schulz, M., Jobe, L.A., 2001. Codification and Tacitness as Knowledge Management Strategies. An Empirical Exploration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12, 139-165.
• Sher, P.J., Yang, P.Y., 2005. The Effects of Innovative Capabilities and R&D Clustering on Firm Performance: The Evidence of Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry. Technovation 25, 33-43.
• Shoenecker, T., Daellenbach, U., Mc Carthy, A.M., 1995. Factors Affecting a Firm's Commitment to Innovation, Academy ofManagement Journal. Best Papers Proceedings, 52-56.
• Schumpeter, J.A., 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Schumpeter, J.A., 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper, NY.
• Souitaris, V., 2002. Firm-specific Competencies Determining Technological Innovation: A Survey in Greece. R&D Management 32, 61-77.
• Spender, J.C., Grant, R., 1996. Knowledge and the Firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal. Winter Special Issue 17, 5-9.
• Subramaniam, M., Youndt, M.A., 2005. The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48, 450-463.
• Szulanski, G., 1996. Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 27-43.
• Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18, 509-533.
• Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., 2008. The Effect of External and Internal Factors on Firms' Product Innovation. Research Policy 37, 616-632.
• Vernon, R., 1966. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 190-207.
• Veugelers, R., 1997. Internal R&D Expenditures and External Technology Sourcing. Research Policy 26, 303-315.
• Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B., 1999. Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing Firms. Research Policy 28, 63-80.
• Vrakking, W.J., 1990. The Innovative Organization. Long Range Planning 23, 94-102.
• Wright, P.M., McMahan, G.C., McWilliams, A., 1994. Human Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based Perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management 5, 301-326.
• Yan, Y., Zhang, J.A., 2003. Performance of High-Tech Firms' Resource and Capabilitybased Develpment: Knowledge Acquisition, Organisational Utilisation and Management Involvement. International Journal of Business Studies 11, 45-68.
• Zack, M.H., 1999. Managing Codified Knowledge. Sloan Management Review summer, 45-58.
• Zander, U., Kogut, B., 1995. Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test. Organization Science 6, 76-92.
• Zollo, M., Winter, S., 2002. Deliberate Learning and Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science 13, 339-351.
• Zott, C., 2003. Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Intra-industry Differential Firms Performance: Insights Form a Simulation Study. Strategic Management Journal 24, 97-125.