El capital estructural y la capacidad innovadora de la empresa

  1. Santos Rodrigues, Helena
  2. Figueroa Dorrego, Pedro
  3. Fernández-Jardón, Carlos María
Revista:
Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa

ISSN: 1135-2523

Ano de publicación: 2011

Volume: 17

Número: 3

Páxinas: 69-89

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/S1135-2523(12)60121-X DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

El entorno empresarial actual presiona a las empresas y a los investigadores para que busquen nuevos factores que permitan alcanzar y mantener sus ventajas competitivas. Entre estos se encuentra cada vez con más importancia el capital intelectual. Un componente representativo de los activos estratégicos de conocimiento, de la propiedad de la empresa, entre otros aspectos, es el capital estructural. Es habitual sospechar que éste afecta a la capacidad innovadora. Sin embargo, es menos conocida la forma en que se produce ese impacto y los aspectos que intervienen. Para investigar esta conexión realizamos una encuesta a 68 empresas que trabajan en el sector de componentes para automoción localizadas en Galicia (Norte de España) y el Norte de Portugal. Los resultados muestran, por un lado, que la capacidad innovadora tiene dos dimensiones: la capacidad innovadora de producto - proceso y la capacidad innovadora de gestión; por otro lado, que el capital estructural influye de forma diferenciada en cada tipo de capacidad innovadora. Verificamos que influye directamente en la capacidad innovadora de gestión.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADLER P.S., KWON S.W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 2002, 27(1):17-40.
  • AHUJA G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 2000, 45(3):425-455.
  • AMABILE T.M. Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review 1997, 40(1):39-58.
  • AMORIM R. Quem não tem ... é como quem não vê. Revista Exame 2008, 289.
  • AVLONITIS G.J., KOUREMENOS A., TZOKAS N. Assessing the innovativeness of organizations and its antecedents: Project Innovstrat. European Journal of Marketing 1994, 28(11):2-28.
  • BADDI A., SHARIFF A. Information management and knowledge integration for enterprise innovations. Logistics Information Management 2003, 6(2):145-155.
  • BONTIS N. Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision 1998, 36(2):63-76.
  • BONTIS N. Managing Organizational Knowledge by Diagnosing Intellectual Capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management 1999, 18(5/6/7/8):433-462.
  • BONTIS N. National Intellectual Capital Index: A United Nations initiative for the Arabic region. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2004, 5(1):13-39.
  • BONTIS N., FITZ-ENZ J. Intellectual capital ROI: A casual map of human capital antecedents and consequents. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2002, 3(3):223-247.
  • BONTIS N., KEOW W.C.C., RICHARDSON S. Intellectual Capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2000, 1(1):85-100.
  • BRENNAN N., CONNEL B. Intellectual Capital: current issues and policy implications. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2000, 1(3):206-240.
  • BROWN A.D., STARKEY K. The effect of Organizational culture on communication and information. Journal of Management Studies 1994, 31(November):807-828.
  • CARDINAL L. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science 2001, 12(1):19-36.
  • CHIAVENATO I. Introdução à teoria geral da administração 1999, Editora Campus, Rio de Janeiro. 5a ed.
  • CHOO C.W., BONTIS N Knowledge, intellectual capital, and strategy: themes and tensions. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge 2002, 3-23. Oxford University Press, New York. C.W. CHOO, N. BONTIS (Eds.).
  • COSTELLO A., OSBORNE J. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment. Research and Evaluation 2005, 10(7):1-9. http://pareonline.net/pdf/v1.
  • CRONBACH L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16(3):297-334.
  • CROSSAN M.M., LANE H.W., WHITE R.E. An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 24(3):522-537.
  • CUNHA N.C.V.D. As práticas gerenciais e suas contribuições para a capacidade de inovação em empresas inovadoras. Tesis doctoral 2005, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
  • CURADO C.M.M. O efeito mediador das estratégias de gestão do conhecimento entre componentes do Capital Intelectual: Um estudo realizado na industria bancária portuguesa. Tesis doctoral 2006, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa.
  • DAFT R.L., WEICK K.E. Toward a model of organization as interpretation system. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9(2):284-295.
  • DAMANPOUR F. Organizational innovation: a meta analysis of effects and determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 1991, 34(3):555-590.
  • DAMANPOUR F. Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science 1996, 42(5):693-716.
  • DARROCH J. Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management 2005, 9(3):101-115.
  • DAVENPORT T.H., PRUSAK L. Working knowledge-how organizations manage what they know 1998, Harvard Business School Press, Boston-Massachusetts.
  • DAVENPORT T.H., PRUSAK L., WILSON H.J. Who's bringing you hot ideas and are you responding?. Harvard Business School Press 2003, 81(2):58-64.
  • DENISI A.S., HITT M.A., JACKSON S.E. The knowledge-based approach to sustainable competitive advantage. Managing knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage 2003, 3-33. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. S. Jackson, M.A. Hitt, A.S. Denisi (Eds.).
  • DíAZ N., AGUIAR I., DE SAá P. El Conocimiento Organizativo Tecnológico y la Capacidad de Innovación. Evidencia para la Empresa Industrial Española. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 2006, (27):33-60.
  • EDVINSSON L., MALONE M.S. Intellectual Capital 1997, Harper Business, USA.
  • ELENKOV D.S., JUDGE W., WRIGHT P. Strategic Leadership and Executive Innovation influence: An International Multi-Cluster Comparative Study. Strategic Management Journal 2005, 26:665-682.
  • FARSON R., KEYES R. The Failure-Tolerant Leader. Harvard Business Review 2002, 80(8):64-71.
  • FIGUEROA DORREGO P.F. Un Modelo para el ánalisis de la configuración estructural de la empresa gallega: consideraciones sobre el factor humano 1997, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela.
  • FIGUEROA DORREGO P.F., FERNáNDEZ-JARDóN C.M. Análisis Estratégico del Factor Humano en la Empresa Gallega: Aspectos críticos y propuestas de mejora 1999, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo. 1a ed.
  • FORD, D. (2001): Trust and Knowledge Management: the seeds of success. Canada: Queens's University at Kingston, Working Paper n°. 01-08, Canada.
  • GALENDE J. Analysis of Technological Innovation from Business Economics and Management. Technovation 2006, 26:300-311.
  • GALFORD R., DRAPEAU A.S. The Enemies of Trust. Harvard Business Review 2003, 81(2):88-95.
  • GONZALEZ GURRIARáN J., FIGUEROA DORREGO P.F. Plan Estratégico de Innovación de Galicia 2003, Xunta de Galicia, Vigo.
  • GOPALAKRISHNAN S., DAMANPOUR F. A Review of Innovation Research in Economics, Sociology and Technology Management. Omega 1997, 25(I):15-28.
  • HAIR J.F., BLACK W., BABIN B., ANDERSON R.E. Multivariate data analysis 2006, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New York. 6a. ed.
  • HARMAN H.H. Análisis factorial moderno 1980, Salnés, Madrid.
  • HARRISON S., SULLIVAN P. Profiting from intellectual capital learning from leading companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2000, 1(1):33-46.
  • HII, J. y NEELY, N. (2000): Innovative capacity of firms: on why some firms are more innovative than other, Paper presented at the 7th International Annual EurOMA Conference 2000, Ghent.
  • I.A.D.E.-C.I.C. Modelo Intellectus: medición y gestión del capital intelectual 2003, Documentos Intelectos, Madrid.
  • JANTUNEN A. Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance. European Journal of Innovation Management 2005, 8(3):336-349.
  • JARDON C., MARTOS M. Competencias básicas en PYME regionales. Revista galega de Economia 2010, Pendente de publicacion.
  • JARDóN C., VERDUGO M., CAL M. Econometría estática aplicada 1997, Tórculo Santiago de Compostela. 1a ed.
  • JASSAWALLA A.R., SASHITTAL H.C. The DNA of culture that promote product innovation. Ivey Business Journal Online 2003, 1:1-6.
  • KAISER H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39:31-36.
  • KING A.W., ZEITHAML C.P. Measuring organizational knowledge: A conceptual and methodological framework. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24(8):763-772.
  • MARTIN DE CASTRO G., ALAMA E., NAVAS J., LOPEZ P. El papel del capital intelectual en la innovación tecnológica: Una aplicación a las empresas de servicios profesionales de España. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 2009, 40:83-110.
  • MARTIN R., MOLDOVEANU M.C. Capital versus Talent: the battle that's Reshaping Business. Harvard Business Review 2003, 81(7):36-41.
  • MOLINA-PALMA M.A. A capacidade de inovação como formadora de valor: análise dos vetores de valor em empresas brasileiras de biotecnologia, Tesis doctoral 2004, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
  • NAHAPIET J., GHOSHAL S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge 2002, 673-698. Oxford University Press, New York. 1a Ed. C.W. Choo, N. Bontis (Eds.).
  • NEELY, A., y HII, J. (1999): The Innovative Capacity of Firms. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on ISO 9000 and TQM, Hong Kong.
  • NONAKA I., TAKEUCHI H. The knowledge Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics of Innovation 1995, Oxford University Press, London. 1a ed.
  • NUNNELLY J.C. Psycometric Theory 1978, McGraw Hill, New York. 2a ed.
  • NYSTROM P.C., RAMAMURTHY K., WILSON A.L. Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 2002, 19(34):221-247.
  • OCDE/UE Oslo Manual 2005, OCDE, Brussels.
  • PAPACONSTANTINOU G. Technology and industrial performance. O.C.D.E Observer 1997, 204:6-10.
  • RAVICHANDRAN T. Redefining organizational innovation: towards theoretical advancements. Journal of High Technology Management Research 2000, 10(2):243-274.
  • ROBERTSON T.S., GATIGNON H. Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing 1986, 50(Jul):1-12.
  • ROOS G., ROOS J. Measuring your Company's Intellectual Performance. Long Range Planning 1997, 30(3):413-426.
  • ROOS J., ROOS G., DRAGONETTI N.C., EDVINSSON L. Intellectual capital: navigating in the new business landscape 1997, MacMillan Business, Basingstoke MacMillan, London.
  • ROUSE M.J., DAELLENBACH U.S. Rethinking research methods for the Resource-Based perspective: Isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20(5):487-494.
  • ROUSSEAU D.M., SITKIN S.B., BURT R.S., CAMERER C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(3):393-404.
  • SAINT-ONGE H. Tacit knowledge: The key to the strategic alignment of Intellectual Capital. Strategy and Leadership 1996, 24(2):10-14.
  • SALAVOU H. The concept of innovativeness: should we need to focus?. European Journal of Innovation Management 2004, 7(1):33-44.
  • SCHNEIDER W.E. Why good management ideas fail: the neglected power of organizational culture. Strategy and Leadership 2000, 28(1):24-29.
  • SHELTON R., DAVILA T., BROWN P. The Seven Rules of Innovation. Optimize 2005, 4(8):51-56.
  • SPENDER J.-C., GRANT R.M. knowledge and the firm: overview. Strategic Management Journal 1996, 17(Special Issue):5-9.
  • STEWART T.A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations 1998, Doubleday, New York. 2a ed.
  • SUBRAMANIAM M., VENKATRAMAN N. Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22:359-378.
  • SUBRAMANIAM M., YOUNDT M.A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48(3):450-463.
  • SUBRAMANIAN A. Innovativeness: redefining the concept. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 1996, 13:223-243.
  • SVEIBY K.-E., SIMONS R. Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management 2002, 6(5):420-433.
  • TSAI W., GHOSHAL S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 1998, 41(4):464-478.
  • VIEDMA MARTI J.M. Innovation Capacity Benchmarking System (I.C.B.S.). World congress on Intellectual Capital Readings 2002, 243-265. Butterworth-Heinemann. N. Bontis (Ed.).
  • WAN D., ONG C.H., LEE F. Determinants of firm innovation in Singapore. Technovation 2005, 25(3):261-268.
  • WOLFE R.A. Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research. Journal of Management Studies 1994, 31(3):405-431.
  • WORREN N., MOORE K., CARDONA P. Modularity, Strategic Flexibility, and Firm Performance: A Study of the Home Appliance Industry. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23(12):1123-1140.
  • YOUNDT M.A., SNELL S.A. Human Resource Configurations, Intellectual Capital, and Organizational Performance. Journal of Management Studies 2004, XVI(3):337-360.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet