Efecto de la agregación de universidades españolas en el Ranking de Shanghai (ARWU)caso de las comunidades autónomas y los campus de excelencia

  1. Docampo Amoedo, Domingo
  2. Herrera Triguero, Francisco
  3. Luque Martínez, Teodoro
  4. Torres-Salinas, Daniel
Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710 1699-2407

Ano de publicación: 2012

Volume: 21

Número: 4

Páxinas: 428-432

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2012.JUL.16 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: El profesional de la información

Resumo

The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) or Shanghai Ranking is a de facto standard to determine the position of universities worldwide. Improving ranking positions has become the goal of universities and governments. No wonder therefore that the aggregation of universities in Spain is nowadays suggested as a means to raise the international profile of our university system. In this context, the goal of this study was to test two potential groupings, universities belonging to the same Autonomous Community and campuses of international excellence (CEIs), to determine the ARWU placement that would result. To compute the ARWU indicators of these possible groupings, we used the methodology developed in Docampo (2012b). The results of our analysis clearly show the difficulty of improving ranking positions by calculating the sum of aggregated institutions. As a matter of fact, the only way to place a university cluster from Spain in the top 100 would be to treat all of the Catalan universities as a single institution. The next best ranking for Spain would be achieved by the Habitat 5U (universities of Comunidad Valenciana), BKC (Barcelona and Politècnica de Catalunya) and VLC/Campus (Valencia and Politécnica de Valencia), CEIs which would lie in the 150-200 range.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio. "Cómo se cocinan los rankings universitarios". Dendra médica. Revista de humanidades, 2012, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 43-58. http://sci2s.ugr.es/rankinguniversidades/prensa/ 2012/SCI03.pdf
  • Docampo, Domingo. "Rankings internacionales y calidad institucional". Revista de educación, 2008, N extraordinario, pp. 149-176. http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re2008/re2008-07.pdf
  • Docampo, Domingo. "On using the Shanghai ranking to assess the research performance of university systems". Scientometrics, 2011, v. 86, n. 1, pp. 77-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0280-y
  • Docampo, Domingo. "Adjusted sum of institutional scores as an indicator of the presence of university systems in the ARWU ranking". Scientometrics, 2012a, v. 90, n. 2, pp. 701-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-011-0490-y
  • Docampo, Domingo. "Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities results". Scientometrics, 2012b (en prensa). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0801-y
  • Liu, Nian-Cai; Cheng, Ying. "Academic ranking of world universities: Methodologies and problems". Higher education in Europe, 2005, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03797720500260116 (Pubitemid 41686282)
  • Luque-Martínez, Teodoro. "University and development: A shared commitment. Marketing akademicki Rola Uniwersytetów w Promocji Miast i Regionów, Lodz (Poland), 2011.
  • Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio; García-Moreno-Torres, José; Herrera, Francisco. "Rankings ISI de las universidades españolas por campos científicos: Descripción y resultados". El profesional de la información, 2011, v. 20, n. 1, pp. 111-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2011.nov.16
  • Van Raan, Anthony FJ. "Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods". Scientometrics, 2005, v. 62, n. 1, pp. 133-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6 (Pubitemid 40397597)