Testosteronic Gadgetsthe 'New' Technology of Orgasm applied to Sex Toys

  1. Pérez Freire, Silvia
Journal:
Sociología y tecnociencia: Revista digital de sociología del sistema tecnocientífico

ISSN: 1989-8487

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 1

Issue: 3

Pages: 57-71

Type: Article

More publications in: Sociología y tecnociencia: Revista digital de sociología del sistema tecnocientífico

Abstract

Sex toys, and the vibrator as its greatest exponent in the passion party world, have become a totemic sex trend in Western sexual culture, going beyond their functional role for both men and women. In the neoliberal postcapitalist societies � based on compulsive, virtual and hedonist consumption � erotophilia is developed and expanded according to the existing sexual imaginary. An overview of the erotic gadgets and their heterosexual practice provide an interesting element to be analyzed to establish the validity of the sex androcentric model, which has been found poor in terms of female sexual satisfaction.

Bibliographic References

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Community. Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Beall, C.M., Worthman, C.M., Stallings, J., Strohl, K.P., Brittenham, G.M. & Barragan, M. (1992) Salivary testosterone concentration of Aymara men native to 3600 m. Annual Human Bioloy, 19(1): 67-78.
  • Berger, P. L. & Luckman, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books. 2006.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). La domination masculine. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 84: 2-31.
  • Bruckner, P. & Finkieldraut, A. (1977). Le nouveau désordre amoureux. Paris: Seuil.
  • Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. III. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Castells, M. & Subirats, M. (2007). Mujeres y hombres. ¿Un amor imposible? Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • CIS (2009). Encuesta nacional de salud sexual. Estudio no 2.780 Noviembre 2008 – Enero 2009. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=9702&cuestionario=11296&muestra=17045
  • Cobo, R. (2011). Hacia una nueva política sexual. Las mujeres ante la reacción patriarcal. Madrid: Catarata.
  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Faludi, S. (1991). The Undeclared War Against American Women. New York: Crown.
  • Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la sexualité. Vol I: La Volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Gil Calvo, E. (1991). La mujer cuarteada. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • Gómez Suárez, Á. & Pérez Freire, S. (2009). Prostitución. Clientes e outros homes. Vigo: Xerais.
  • Guasch, O. (1993). Para una sociología de la sexualidad. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 64: 105-121.
  • Guimarães, Jr. M. (2004). De pés descalços no ciberaspaço: tecnología e cultura no contidiano de um grupo social on-line. Horizontes Antropológicos, 10 (21). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-71832004000100006
  • Herrera Gómez, C. (2010). La construcción sociocultural del amor romántico. Madrid: Editorial Fundamentos.
  • Hines, T. M. (2001). Clinical Opinion: The G-Spot: A Modern Gynecologic Myth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 185 (2): 359-362.
  • Hite, S. (2006). The Shere Hite Reader: New and Selected Writings on Sex, Globalism, and Private Life. New York: Seven Stories Press.
  • INE (2011). Encuesta de población activa. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Madrid. http://www.ine.es/jaxiBD/menu.do?L=0&divi=EPA&his=3&type=db
  • Lagarde, M. (1990). Los cautiverios de las mujeres: madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  • Lewontin, R. C. (1995). Human Diversity. New York: Scientific American Library.
  • Lowe, M. (1983). The Dialectic of Biology and Culture. In M. Lowe & R. Hubbard (Eds.) Woman´s Nature: Rationalizations of Inequality. Nueva York: PergamenPress, pp. 39-62.
  • Mace, D. R., Bannerman, R. H. O. & Burton, J. (1974). The Teaching of Human Sexuality in Schools for Health Professionals (Public Health Paper n. 57). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Maines, R. P. (1999). The Technology of Orgasm: 'Hysteria', the Vibrator, and Women's Sexual Satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Monferrer, J. M. (2012). Serrano Vicéns: el Kinsey español. In R. Osborne (Ed.) Mujeres Bajo Sospecha. Memoria y Sexualidad 1930-1980. Madrid: Editorial Fundamentos.
  • Pfizer (2011). ¿Qué quieren las mujeres? Informe europeo sobre Hábitos Sexuales. Madrid: Pfizer.
  • Pommier, G. (1989). L'Ordre sexuel. Paris: Champs Flammarion.
  • Preciado, B. (2010). Pornotopía. Arquitectura y sexualidad en 'Playboy' durante la guerra fría. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • Spencer, R., Nevid, J., Fichner-Rathus, L. & López Sánchez, F. (Eds.) (2005). Sexualidad Humana.Madrid: Pearson Alhambra.
  • WHO (1975). Education and Treatment in Human Sexuality: The Training of Health Professionals (WHO Technical Report Series n. 572). Geneva: World Health Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_572.pdf