¿Es rentable "pensar por pensar"? Evidencia sobre innovación en España

Referencias bibliográficas

• Arbusà A., Coenders G. Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments and absorptive capacity: evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy 2007, 36:1454-1558.
• Arrow K.J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors 1962, 609-625. Princeton University Press, Princeton. NBER (Ed.).
• Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
• Bhattacharya M., Bloch H. Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics 2004, 22:155-162.
• Caloghirou Y., Kastelli I., Tsakanikas A. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation 2004, 24:29-39.
• Cassiman B., Pérez-Castrillo D., Veugelers R. Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2002, 20(6):775-799.
• Cassiman B., Veugelers R. R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review 2002, 92(4):1169-1184.
• Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 2006, 52(1):68-82.
• Chandy R.K., Tellis G.L. The incumbent's curse. Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 2000, 64:1-17.
• Chesbrough H.W. The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual operty. California Management Review 2003, 45(3):33-58.
• Cockburn I., Henderson R. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behaviour, and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics 1998, 46(2):157-182.
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 1989, 99:569-596.
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:128-152.
• Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 2002, 48(1):1-23.
• Cooper R.G. The performance impact of product innovation strategies. European Journal of Marketing 1984, 18(5):5-54.
• Cooper R.G. New products: what distinguishes the winners?. Research and Technology Management 1990, 33:27-31.
• Damanpour F. An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. Bristish Journal of Management 2010, 21:996-1010.
• De Marchi M., Rocchi M. Basic research in Italian industry. R&D Management 2000, 30(1):79-88.
• Dean T.J., Brown R.L., Bamford C.E. Differences in large and small firm responses to environmental context: strategic implications from a comparative analysis of business formations. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19:709-728.
• Dougherty D. Understanding new markets for new products. Strategic Management Journal 1990, 11:59-78.
• Durisin B., Calabretta G., Parmeggiani V. The intellectual structure of product innovation research: a bibliometric study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984-2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2010, 27(3):437-451.
• Dyer J.H., Singh H. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(4):660-679.
• Escribano A., Fosfuri A., Tribó J. Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy 2009, 38:96-105.
• European Union Research Advisory Board, 2004. The structural funds and the research component: proposal on the use of the structural funds to support an improved mix of public financing instruments in order to increase the research and development investments according to the Lisbon objectives. disponible en: [consultado 21 Feb 2011]. https://europa.eu/sinapse/sinapse/.
• Eurostat, 2011. Statistics: science, technology and innovation database [consultado 2 May 2012]. Disponible en:. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/science_technology_innovation/data/database,%20web.
• Fosfuri A., Tribó J. Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega 2008, 35:173-187.
• Gambardella A. Competitive advantages from in-house basic research. Research Policy 1992, 21:391-407.
• Geroski P.A. Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers 1990, 42:586-602.
• Gregorio D.D., Shane S. Why so some universities generate more start-ups than others?. Research Policy 2003, 32:209-227.
• Griliches Z. Returns to research and development expenditures in the private sector. New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis 1980, 419-454. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. J. Kendrik, B. Vaccara (Eds.).
• Griliches Z. Productivity, R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970's. American Economic Review 1986, 76(1):141-154.
• Henard D., McFadyen M. The complementary roles of applied and basic research: a knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2005, 22:503-514.
• Henard D.H., Szymanski D.M. Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research 2001, 38:362-375.
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal 1994, 15:63-84.
• Hoffman K., Parejo M., Bessant J., Perren L. Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review. Technovation 1998, 18:39-55.
• Jaccard J. Interaction effects in logistic regression 2001, Sage Publications, California.
• Jaccard J., Dodge T. Analyzing contingent effects in regression models. The Handbook of Data Analysis 2009, 237-258. Sage Publications, California. M. Hardy, A. Bryman (Eds.).
• Jansen J., Van den Bosch F., Volberda H. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter. Academy Management Journal 2005, 48(6):999-1015.
• Judd C.M., Kenny D.A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluation. Evaluation Review 1981, 5:307-321.
• Kamien M.I., Zang I. Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2000, 18:995-1012.
• Kirner E., Kinkel S., Jaeger A. Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms - An empirical analysis of German industry. Research Policy 2009, 38(3):447-458.
• Klevorick A.K., Levin R.C., Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 1995, 24:185-205.
• Lane P.J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19:461-477.
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing newproduct development. Strategic Management Journal 1992, 13:111-125.
• Levin, R.C. 1981. Toward an empirical model of Schumpeterian competition. Working paper series A, 43, Yale School of Organization and Management.
• Levin R.C., Cohen W.M., Mowery D.C. R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: new evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses. American Economic Review Proceedings 1985, 75:20-24.
• Levin R.C., Klevorick A., Nelson R.R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987, 3:783-820.
• Liao S.-H., Wu C.-C., Hu D.-C., Tsui K.-A. Relationships between knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity and innovation capability: an empirical study on Taiwan's financial and manufacturing industries. Journal of Information Science 2010, 36(1):19-35.
• Lim K. The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997). Research Policy 2004, 33:287-321.
• Love J.H., Roper S. The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects. Review of Industrial Organization 1999, 15:43-64.
• Mancusi, M.L, 2004. International spillovers and absorptive capacity: a cross-country, cross-sector analysis based on European patents and citations. Working paper. Disponible en: [consultado 21 Feb 2011]. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/ei/ei35.pdf.
• Mansfield E. Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing. American Economic Review 1980, 70(5):863-873.
• Mansfield E. Composition of R and D expenditures: relationship to size, concentration, and innovation output. Review of Economics and Statistics 1981, 62:610-614.
• Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Management Science 1986, 32:173-181.
• Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., Ziedonis A.A. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy 2001, 30:99-119.
• Muller D., Judd C.M., Yzerbyt V.Y. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89(6):852-863.
• Murovec N., Prodan I. Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation 2009, 29:859-872.
• Nelson R.R. The simple of economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 1959, 67(3):297-306.
• Nieto M., Quevedo P. Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation 2005, 25:1141-1157.
• Nieto M.J., Santamaría L. The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 2007, 27(3):367-377.
• OECD, 2005. Manual de Olso. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación. OECD.
• Oltra M.J., Flor M. The impact of technological opportunities and innovative capatilities on firms' output innovation. Creativiy & Innovation Management 2003, 12:137-145.
• Ottoz E., Cugno F. Patent-Secret Mix in Complex Product Firms. American Law & Economics Review 2008, 10(1):142-158.
• Pavitt K. What makes basic research economically useful. Research Policy 1991, 20:109-119.
• Pisano G.P. The evolution of science-based business: innovating how we innovate. Industrial & Corporate Change 2010, 19(2):465-482.
• Pisano G.P., Teece D.J. How to Capture Value from Innovation: shaping intellectual property and industry architecture. California Management Review 2007, 50(1):278-296.
• Quintás M.A., Vázquez X.H., García J.M., Caballero G. Geographical amplitude in the international generation of technology: present situation and business determinants. Research Policy 2008, 37(8):1371-1381.
• Quintás M.A., Vázquez X.H., García J.M., Caballero G. International generation of technology: an assessment of its intensity, motives and facilitators. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2009, 21(6):743-763.
• Rocha F. Inter-firm technological cooperation: effects of absorptive capacity, firm-size and specialization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1999, 8:253-271.
• Rosenberg N. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money). Research Policy 1990, 19:165-174.
• Rothaermel F.T., Hess M.H. Building dynamic capabilities: innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science 2007, 18(6):898-921.
• Rothwell R. Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management 1992, 22:221-239.
• Sampat B.N. Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: the world before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy 2006, 35:772-789.
• Schmidt T. Absorptive capacity-one size fits all? A firm-level analysis of absorptive capacity for different kinds of knowledge. Managerial and Decisions Economics 2010, 31:1-18.
• Schmookler J. Invention and economic growth 1966, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Schoenmakers W., Duysters G. Learning in strategic technology alliances. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2006, 18(2):245-264.
• Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: when is mobility more likeky to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer?. Management Science 2003, 49:351-365.
• Souitaris V. Firm-specific competencies determining technological innovation: a survey in Greece. R&D Management 2002, 32:61-77.
• Stock G.N., Greis N.P., Fisher W.A. Absorptive capacity and new product development. Journal of High Technology Management Research 2001, 12:77-91.
• Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy 1986, 15(6):285-305.
• Measuring Strategic Competencies: Technological, Market and Organisational Indicators of Innovation 2000, Imperial College Press, London. J. Tidd (Ed.).
• Todora G., Durisin B. Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32(3):774-786.
• Tripsas M. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 1997, 6(2):341-377.
• Tsai W.P. Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy 2009, 38:765-778.
• Urgal B., Quintás M.A., Arevalo T. Conocimiento tecnológico, capacidad de innovación y desempeño innovador: el rol moderador del ambiente interno de la empresa. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de Empresas 2011, 14(1):53-66.
• Vázquez X.H. Allocation of decision rights on the shop floor: a perspective from Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory. Organization Science 2004, 15(4):463-480.
• Vázquez X.H. An eclectic explanation of shopfloor control using efficiency and power theories. Organization Studies 2006, 27(10):1421-1446.
• Vega-Jurado J., Gutiérrez-Gracia A., Fernández-de-Lucio I., Manjarrés-Henríquez L. The effect of external and internal factors on firms' product innovation. Research Policy 2008, 37:616-632.
• Von Hippel E. The sources of innovation 1988, Oxford University Press, Nueva York.
• Webster E. Firms' decisions to innovate and innovation routines. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2004, 13:733-745.
• Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 1984, 5:171-180.
• White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent variance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980, 48(4):817-838.
• Zahra S., George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 2002, 27(2):185-203.
• Zellner C. The economic effects of basic research: evidence for embodied knowledge transfer via scientists migration. Research Policy 2003, 32(10):1881-1895.