Categorías léxicas en tipología lingüística

Referencias bibliográficas

• anward, jan, edith moravcsik y Leon stassen (1997): “Parts of speech: A challenge for typology”, Linguistic Typology 1/2, pp. 167-184.
• Broschart, jürgen (1997): “Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs”, Linguistic Typology 1/2, pp. 123­166.
• chafe, waLLace (2012): “Are adjectives universal? The case of Northern Iroquoian”, Linguistic Typology 16, pp. 1­39.
• chung, sandra (2012): “Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro”, Theoretical Linguistics 38/1­2, pp. 1­56.
• coseriu, eugenio (1978): “Sobre las categorías verbales («partes de la oración»)”, in Gramática, semántica, universales. Estudios de Lingüística Funcional. Madrid: Gredos, pp. 50-79.
• croft, wiLLiam (1991): Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• ____ (2000): “Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories”, in P. M. Vogel y B. Comrie (eds.): Approaches to the typology of word classes. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 65-102.
• ____ (2001): Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• ____ (2005): “Word classes, parts of speech, and syntactic argumentation”, Linguistic Typology 9, pp. 431­441.
• croft, wiLLiam y eva van Lier (2012): “Language universals without universal categories”, Theoretical Linguistics 38/1­2, pp. 57­72.
• dik, simon c. (1989): The theory of functional grammar. Part I: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.
• dixon, rmw (1977): “Where have all the adjectives gone?”, Studies in Language 1, pp. 19-80.
• evans, nichoLas y toshiki osada (2005): “Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes”, Linguistic Typology 9/3, pp. 351­390.
• foLey, wiLLiam a. (1998): “Symmetrical Voice Systems and Precategoriality in Philippine Languages”, in Workshop on Voice and Grammatical Functions in Austronesian Languages, LFG98 Conference. Brisbane.
• ____ (2008): “The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems”, in P. Austin y S. Musgrave (eds.): Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 22­44.
• giL, david (1993): “Tagalog Semantics”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 19/1, pp. 390­403.
• givón, taLmy (1984): Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• goLdBerg, adeLe e. (1995): Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press.
• haspeLmath, martin (2010): “Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies”, Language 86/3, pp. 663­687.
• ____ (2012): “Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals”, Theoretical Linguistics 38/1­2, pp. 91­102.
• hengeveLd, kees (1992): “Parts of speech”, in M. Fortescue, P. Harder y L. Kristoffersen (eds.): Layered structure and reference in a functional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 29-55.
• hengeveLd, kees y eva van Lier (2010): “An implicational map of parts of speech”, Linguistic Discovery 8/1, pp. 129-156.
• hengeveLd, kees y jan rijkhoff (2005): “Mundari as a flexible language”, Linguistic Typology 9, pp. 406­430.
• hengeveLd, kees, jan rijkhoff y anna siewierska (2004): “Parts-of-speech systems and word order”, Journal of Linguistics 40/03, pp. 527­570.
• himmeLmann, nikoLaus (2008): “Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog”, in P. Austin y S. Musgrave (eds.): Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 247­293.
• hopper, pauL j. y sandra a. thompson (1984): “The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar”, Language 60/4, pp. 703­752.
• kaufman, danieL (2009): “Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study”, Theoretical Linguistics 35/1, pp. 1­49.
• kinkade, m. daLe (1983): “Salish evidence against the universality of ‘noun’ and ‘verb’”, Lingua 60/1, pp. 25­39.
• Langacker, ronaLd w. (1987a): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
• ____ (1987b): “Nouns and verbs”, Language 63/1, pp. 53­94.
• Lehmann, christian (2008): “Roots, stems and word classes”, Studies in Language 32/3, pp. 546-567.
• van Lier, eva (2012): “Reconstructing multifunctionality”, Theoretical Linguistics 38/1­2, pp. 119­135.
• mithun, marianne (2000): “Noun and verb in Iroquoian languages: multicategorisation from multiple criteria”, in P. M. Vogel y B. Comrie (eds.): Approaches to the typology of word classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 397­420.
• moreno caBrera, juan carLos (1995): “El enfoque teórico-tipológico de las partes del discurso”, in La lingüística teórico-tipológica. Madrid: Gredos, pp. 75-98.
• ____ (1999): “Nombre, verbo y etnocentrismo lingüístico”, in Homenatge a Jesús Tusón. Barcelona: Empúries, pp. 232­244.
• peterson, john (2005): “There’s a grain of truth in every “myth”, or, Why the discussion of lexical classes in Mundari isn’t quite over yet”, Linguistic Typology 9, pp. 391­405.
• saLazar-garcía, ventura (2012): “Implicaciones teóricas del concepto de flexibilidad categorial”, in A. Cabedo Nebot y P. Infante Ríos (eds.): Lingüística XL. La lingüística del siglo XXI. Madrid: SEL ediciones, pp. 381­386.
• sasse, hans-jürgen (1993): “Syntactic categories and subcategories”, in J. Jacobs et al. (eds.): Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. HSK 9. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 653­661.
• ____ (2001): “Scales between nouniness and verbiness”, in M. Haspelmath et al. (eds.): Language Typology and LanguageUniversals: An International Handbook. HSK 20. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 495-509.
• schachter, pauL (1985): “Parts of speech systems”, in T. Shopen (ed.): Language typology and syntactic description. I: Clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3­61.
• taLmy, Leonard (1985): “Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms”, en T. Shopen (ed.): Language typology and syntactic description (vol. 3): Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 57-149.
• tayLor, john r. (2002): Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• thompson, sandra a. (1989): “A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category “Adjective””, in R. Corrigan, F. Eckaman y M. Noonan (eds.): Linguistic Categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 245-265.
• tuggy, david (1993): “Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness”, Cognitive Linguistics 4/3, pp. 273­290.