Prevención del riesgo de dificultad lectora en estudiantes de primer ciclo de Educación Primaria

  1. Ramos Trigo, Aida
  2. Conde Rodríguez, Ángeles
  3. Alfonso Gil, Sonia
  4. Deaño Deaño, Manuel
Journal:
Aula abierta

ISSN: 0210-2773

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 42

Issue: 1

Pages: 15-21

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S0210-2773(14)70003-4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Aula abierta

Abstract

Among the range of programmes in reading intervention, those of direct teaching of reading skills should be highlighted, along with those that are based on cognitive processes and mediated education. The latter two allow progress to be made in learning reading skills and to improve cognitive processes. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of a cognitive and mediated reading programme of intervention in the processes of a consecutive codification in a group of pupils from 2nd year of Primary School aged between 6.11 and 8.08 years (M = 7.07; SD = 0.26). 12 out of 29 participants formed the control group, and the other 17 formed the experimental one. A programme of reinforcement of reading skills was applied to members of the experimental group with low marks in consecutive processing and reading achievement. The methodology of the programme i s designed so that the process of learning to read takes place spontaneously by internalizing principles and strategies. The results showed an outstanding progress in the scores in the consecutive processing of the experimental group. The initial differences in the consecutive codification observed in both groups disappeared due to the effectiveness of the programme.

Bibliographic References

  • Alfonso, S., Deaño, M., Almeida, L. S., Conde, A., y García-Señorán, M. (2012). Facilitación del conocimiento alfabético en preescolar a través del entrenamiento en codificación, grafomotricidad y lectura. Psicothema, 24(4), 573-580.
  • Campione, J. C., y Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. En C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An integrated approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-115). New York: Guilford.
  • Catalá, G., Catalá, M., Molina, E., y Monclús, R. (2001). Evaluación de la Comprensión Lectora (ACL). Barcelona: Graó.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., y Arribas, D. (2007). Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores Revisada (PROLEC-R). Madrid: TEA.
  • Das, J. P. (1999). PREP: PASS Reading Enhancement Program. Deal, N.J.: Sarka Educational Resources.
  • Das, J. P., Carlson, J., Davidson, M. B., y Longe, K. (1997). PREP: PASS remedial program. Seatle, WA: Hogrefe.
  • Das, J. P., Cummins, J., Kirby, J. R., y Jarman, R. F. (1979). Simoultaneous and sccesive proceses, language and mental abilities. Canadian Psychological Review, 20, 1-11.
  • Das, J. P., Mishra, R. K., y Pool, J. E. (1995). An experiment on cognitive remediation of word-reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 66-79.
  • Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., y Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes. The PASS theory of intelligence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Deaño, M. (2005). Batería Das.Naglieri: Sistema de Evaluación Cognitiva (D.N: CAS) Adaptación Española. Ourense: Gersam Ediciones.
  • Deaño, M., y Rodríguez-Moscoso, M. Y. (2002). Fundamentación teórica del Programa de Rehabilitación y Enriquecimiento PASS-Matemático (PREP-M). Educación, Desarrollo y Diversidad, 5(1), 53-72.
  • Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., y Francis, D. (2006). An evaluation of intensive interventions for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447-466.
  • Jiménez, J. E., Artiles, C., Rodríguez, C., Naranjo, F., González, D., Crespo, P., et al. (2011). Dificultades específicas de aprendizaje: mirando hacia el futuro. Revista Electrónica de Dificultades de Aprendizaje, 1(1).
  • Kirby, J. R. (1988). Style, strategy, and skill in reading. En R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning styles and learning strategies. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Kirby, J. R., y Das, J. P. (1977). Reading achievement, IQ and simultaneous-successive processing. Journal of Education Psychology, 69, 564-570.
  • Kirby, J. R., y Das, J. P. (1990). A cognitive approach to intelligence: Attention, coding and planning. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 31(4), 320-333.
  • Kirby, J. R., y Robinson, G. (1987). Simultaneous and successive processing in reading disabled children. Journal Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 243-252.
  • Kirby, J. R., y Williams, N. H. (1991). Learning problems: A cognitive approach. Toronto: Kagan and Woo.
  • Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., y Cirino, P. T. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at-risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 390-398.
  • Naglieri, J. A., y Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Illinois: Riverside Publishing.
  • Papadopoulos, T. C., Charalambous, A., Kanari, A., y Loizou, M. (2004). Kindergarten cognitive intervention for reading difficulties: The PREP remediation in Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 79-105.
  • Papadopoulos T. C., Das, J. P., Parrila, R. K., y Kirby, J. R. (2003). Children at risk of developing reading difficulties: A remediation study. School Psychology International, 24, 340-366.
  • Parrila, R. K., Das, J. P., Kendrick, M. E., Papadopoulos, T. C., y Kirby, J. R. (1999). Efficacy of a cognitive reading remediation program for at-risk children in grade 1. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 27(2), 1-31.
  • Timoneda, C., Pérez, F., Mayoral, S., y Serra, M. (2013). Diagnóstico de las dificultades de lectura y escritura y de la dislexia basado en la Teoría PASS de la inteligencia utilizando la batería D.N-CAS. Origen cognitivo de la dislexia. Aula Abierta, 41(1), 5-16.
  • Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The Prevention of Reading Difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7-26.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist 33(2/3), 73-86.