Facilitación del conocimiento alfabético en preescolar a través del entrenamiento en codificación, grafomotricidad y lectura.

  1. Alfonso Gil, Sonia
  2. Deaño Deaño, Manuel
  3. Almeida, Leandro S.
  4. Conde Rodríguez, Ángeles
  5. García Señorán, María del Mar
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2012

Volume: 24

Issue: 4

Pages: 573-580

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

The goal of the present study is to analyze the influence of training in initiation to learning reading. Participants in the study were 144 preschool children from four public schools of Galicia, from a rural area of the Region of Paradanta. Out of the total sample, 72 were assigned to the experimental groups and 72 to the control groups. The design was pretest-posttest with randomized participants. Reading skills were measured with the Visual Recognition and Grapheme-Phoneme Conversion Test (TECOL).The data was analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance. Training significantly increased the reading skill scores of the experimental groups, compared to the control groups. The program has shown a triple interaction between Measure Training × Level School. This means that there was significant variation in mean scores of reading skills as a result of training and according to the different school levels. It is concluded that the basic reading skill to develop in early childhood education is the identification and naming of letters.

Bibliographic References

  • Abbott, R., Berninger, V., y Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281-298.
  • Alfonso, S., y Deaño, M. (2009). Experimentación del Programa de Intervención Cognitiva en Lectura y Escritura (PICLE) (Tesis Doctoral Europea). Universidad de Vigo-España (http://biblio.cesga.es/search *gag/?searchtype=X&searchscope=3&searcharg=tesis+ineditas&SOR T=D).
  • Ball, E.W., y Blachman, B.A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49-66.
  • Barker, T.A., y Torgesen, J.K. (1995). An evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness with below average readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 89-103.
  • Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Billingsley, F., y Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. En M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and brain (pp. 383-411). Parkton, MD: York Press.
  • Blachman, B.A., Ball, E.W., Black, R.S., y Tangel, D.M. (1994). Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms: Does it make a difference? Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-18.
  • Bravo, L., Villalón, M., y Orellana, E. (2006). Predictibilidad del rendimiento en la lectura: una investigación de seguimiento de primer a tercer año. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38(1), 9-20.
  • Brown, A., y Campione, J. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 14, 1059-1068.
  • Bus, A.G., y van Ijzendoorn, M.H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403-414.
  • Byrne, B., y Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451-455.
  • Campione, J.C., y Brown, A.L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. En C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An integrated approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-115). New York: Guilford.
  • Das, J.P. (2000). Herramientas básicas para el desarrollo cognitivo en el nuevo milenio: los usos del PASS para entender las dificultades lectoras. Educación, Desarrollo y Diversidad, 2, 69-82.
  • Das, J.P., y Kendrick, M. (1997). PASS Reading Enhancement Program: A short manual for teachers. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 193-208.
  • Das, J.P., Mishra, R.K., y Pool, J.E. (1995). An experiment on cognitive remediation of word-reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 66-79.
  • Das, J.P., Naglieri, J.A., y Kirby, J.R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon Publishers.
  • Das, J.P., Parrila, R.K., y Papadopoulos, T.C. (2000). Cognitive education and reading disability. En A. Kozulin y Y. Rand (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein's theory in education and psychology (pp. 274-291). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Domínguez, A., Cuetos, F., y de Vega, M. (1993). Efectos diferenciales de la frecuencia silábica: dependencia del tipo de prueba y características de los estímulos. Estudios de Psicología, 50, 5-31.
  • Ehri, L.C., y McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14, 135-163.
  • Gallego, C. (marzo 2006). Los prerrequisitos lectores. Ponencia presentada en el Congreso Internacional de Lectoescritura. Morelia (México).
  • González, M.J., Romero, J.F., y Blanca, M.J. (1995). Modelo causal sobre el aprendizaje de la lectura. Psicothema, 7(2), 377-390.
  • Goswami, U. (2002). Early phonological development and the acquisition of literacy. En S. Neuman y D. Dickinson. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 111-125). Londres: The Guilford Press.
  • Goswami, U., y Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hurford, D.P., Johnston, M., Nepote, P., Hampton, S., Moore, S., Neal, J., Mueller, A., McGeorge, K., Huff, L., Awad, A., Tatro, C., Juliano, C., y Huffman, D. (1994). Early identification and remediation of phonological-processing deficits in first-grade children at-risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 647-659.
  • Jiménez, J.E., y Guzmán, R. (2003). The influence of code-oriented versus meaning-oriented approaches to reading instruction on word recognition in the Spanish language. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 65-78.
  • Jiménez, J.E., Artiles, C., Muñetón, M., Díaz, A., y O'Shanahan, I. (2002). Influencia de los métodos de enseñanza sobre los procesos léxicos en la escritura. En J.N. García (Coord.), Aplicaciones de intervención psicopedagógica. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Jiménez, J.E., García, E., y Venegas, E. (2007). Are phonological processes the same or different in low literacy adults and children with or without reading disabilities in a consistent orthography? Manuscrito remitido para su publicación.
  • Jiménez, J.E., Guzmán, R., y Artiles, C. (1997). Efectos de la frecuencia silábica posicional en el aprendizaje de la lectura. Cognitiva, 1, 3-27.
  • Jiménez, J., y O'Shanahan, I. (2008). Enseñanza de la lectura: de la teoría y la investigación a la práctica educativa. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 45(5), 2-22.
  • Kirby, J.R., y Williams, N.H. (1991). Learning problems: A cognitive approach. Toronto: Kagan and Woo.
  • Labat, H., Ecalle, J., y Magnan, A. (2010). Effect of two-mode trainings of letter knowledge: Across-sectional study with 3-and 5 year-old children. Psichologie Française, 55(2), 113-127.
  • Mantzicopoulos, P., Morrison, D., Stone, E., y Setrakian, W. (1992). Use of SEARCH/TEACH tutoring approach with middle-class students at-risk for reading failure. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 573-586.
  • Papadopoulos, T., Das, J.P., Parrila, R.K., y Kirby, J.R. (2003). Children at risk for developing reading difficulties: A remediation study. School Psychology International, 24, 340-366.
  • Parrila, R.K., Das, J.P., Kendrick, M.E., Papadopoulos, T.C., y Kirby, J.R. (1999). Efficacy of a cognitive reading remediation program for at-risk children in grade 1. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 27(2), 1-31.
  • Pressley, M. (1994). Commentary on the whole language debate. En C.B. Smith (Ed.), Whole language: The debate (pp. 155-178). Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication.
  • Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works. New York, London: Guilford Publishers.
  • Rius, M.D. (2003). La grafomotricidad como un proceso lingüístico. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
  • Sawyer, D. (1992). Language ablities, reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia: A discussion of hypothetical and observed relationship. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 82-95.
  • Sellés, P., y Martínez, T. (2008). Evaluación de los predictores y facilitadores de la lectura. Bordón, 60(3), 113-129.
  • Soriano, M. (coord., 2007). Velocilector. Un programa multicomponencial de intervención en dificultades lectoras. Versión experimental no publicada. Universidad de Valencia.
  • Whitehurst, G.J., y Lonigan, C.J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 335-357.
  • Ziegler, J., y Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. American Psychological Association, 131(1), 3-29.
Data source: Dialnet