Financial situation and political parties in local governmentsEmpirical evidence in the Spanish municipalities

  1. Cabaleiro Casal, Roberto
  2. Buch Gómez, Enrique J.
  3. Vaamonde Liste, Antonio
Revista:
Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa

ISSN: 1135-2523

Ano de publicación: 2014

Volume: 20

Número: 3

Páxinas: 110-121

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEE.2013.11.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa

Resumo

In contrast to several studies presented in the literature which analyze how different political elements affect specific aspects of financial management of public institutions, we have investigated from a comprehensive perspective how various political factors influence the financial situation of the municipalities. To do this, we use diverse multivariate techniques, the concept of financial condition and a large sample of Spanish municipalities. By isolating the electoral cycle and analyzing the essence of political factors, our main findings are that conservative and progressive parties do not present different behavior in relation to any of the financial dimensions. The territoriality of political parties influences the relationship between fund transfers received by the municipalities and certain expenses and investments. Furthermore, we did not detect that, in Spain, a partisan alignment exists between municipalities and the upper-level institutions.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alesina A., Perotti R. The political economy of budget deficits. IMF Staffs Papers 1995, 42(March):1-31.
  • Alesina A., Tabellini G. A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. Review of Economic Studies 1990, 57:403-414.
  • Ashworth J., Geys B., Heyndels B. Government weakness and local public debt development in Flemish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance 2005, 12:395-422.
  • Benito B., Bastida F.J. Politics and financial management: A long-term evaluation on Spanish local governments. International Journal of Critical Accounting 2010, 2:249-266.
  • Berne R. The Relationships between Financial Reporting and the Measurement of Financial Condition 1992, GASB Research Report n° 18, GASB, Norwalk.
  • Borge L.E. Strong politicians, small deficits: Evidence from Norwegian local governments. European Journal of Political Economy 2005, 21:325-344.
  • Bosch N., Suarez-Pandiello J. Seven hypotheses about public choice and local spending: A test for Spanish municipalities. Public Finance 1995, 50:36-50.
  • Brancati D. The origins and strengths of regional parties. British Journal of Political Science 2008, 38:135-159.
  • Brollo F., Nannicini T. Tying your enemy's hands in close races: The politics of federal transfers in Brazil. IZA Discussion Papers 5698 2010, Bonn.
  • Bruce D., Carrol D.A., Deskins J.A., Rork J.C. Road to ruin? A spatial analysis of state highway spending. Public Budgeting & Finance 2007, 27:66-85.
  • Cabaleiro R., Buch E., Vaamonde A. Developing a method to assessing the municipal financial health. American Review of Public Administration 2012, 10.1177/0275074012451523.
  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Indicators of government financial condition 1997, CICA, Toronto, Canada.
  • Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Public Sector Statements of Recommended Practice (SORP) 4. Indicators of financial condition 2009, CICA, Toronto, Canada.
  • Carmeli A. Introduction: Fiscal and financial crises of local governments. International Journal of Public Administration 2003, 26:1423-1430.
  • Carmeli A., Cohen A. The financial crisis of the local authorities in Israel: A resource-based analysis. Public Administration 2001, 79:893-913.
  • Clark T.N. Fiscal management of American cities: Funds flow indicators. Journal of Accounting Research 1977, 15(Suppl.):54-94.
  • Clark T.N. Municipal fiscal strain: Indicators and causes. Government Finance Review 1994, 10:27-29.
  • Curto-Grau M., Solé-Ollé A., Sorribas-Navarro P. The returns to partisan alignment between layers of government. CESifo Area Conference on Public Sector Economics 2012.
  • Desposato S. The impact of federalism on national political parties in Brazil. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2004, 29:259-285.
  • Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B., Weingast B. Tragic brilliance: Equilibrium party hegemony in Mexico. Working Paper 2006, Hoover Institution.
  • Franzese R.J. Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 2002, 5:369-421.
  • García-Sánchez I.M., Mordan N., Prado-Lorenzo J.M. Effect of the political system on local financial condition: Empirical evidence for Spain's largest municipalities. Public Budgeting & Finance 2012, 32:40-68.
  • Geys B. Government weakness and local public debt cycles: Evidence from Flemish municipalities. Local Government Studies 2007, 33:239-253.
  • Goeminne S., Geys B., Smolders C. Political fragmentation and projected tax revenues: Evidence from Flemish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance 2008, 115:297-315.
  • Groves S.M., Godsey W.M., Shulman M.A. Financial indicators for local governments. Public Budgeting and Finance 1981, 1:5-19.
  • Hearl D., Budge J.I., Pearson B. Distinctiveness of regional voting: A comparative analysis across the European community countries (1979-93). Electoral Studies 1996, 15(May):167-182.
  • Hendrick R. Assessing and measuring the fiscal heath of local governments. Urban Affairs Review 2004, 40:78-114.
  • Honadle B.W. The states' role in U.S. local government fiscal crises: A theoretical model and results of a national survey. International Journal of Public Administration 2003, 26:1431-1472.
  • Honadle B.W., Costa J.M., Cigler B.A. Fiscal heath for local governments 2004, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • International City/County Management Association [ICMA] Evaluating financial condition. A handbook for local government 2003, ICMA, Washington, DC. 4th ed.
  • Kloha P., Weissert C.S., Kleine R. Someone to watch over me: State monitoring of local fiscal conditions. The American Review of Public Administration 2005, 35:236-255.
  • Mercer T., Gilbert M. A financial condition index for Nova Scotia municipalities. Government Finance Review 1996, 12:36-38.
  • Persson T., Svensson L. Why a stubborn conservative would run a deficit: Policy with time-inconsistent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1989, 104:325-345.
  • Poterba J.M. State responses to fiscal crises - The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy 1994, 102:799-821.
  • Rattsø J., Tovmo P. Fiscal discipline and asymmetric adjustment of revenues and expenditures: Local government responses to shocks in Denmark. Public Finance Review 2002, 30:208-234.
  • Rivenbark W.C., Roenigk D.J. Implementation of financial condition analysis in local governments. Public Administration Quarterly 2011, 35:238-264.
  • Roubini N., Sachs J.D. Political and economic determinants of Budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review 1989, 33:903-938.
  • Scheiner E. Pipelines of pork. Japanese politics and a model of local opposition party failure. Comparative Political Studies 2005, 38:799-823.
  • Sohl S., Peddle M.T., Thurmaier K., Wood C.H., Kuhn G. Measuring the financial position of municipalities: Numbers do not speak for themselves. Public Budgeting & Finance 2009, (Fall):74-96.
  • Solé-Ollé A., Sorribas-Navarro P. The effects of partisan alignment on the allocation of intergovernmental transfers. Differences-in-differences estimates for Spain. Journal of Public Economics 2008, 92:2302-2319.
  • Stokes S.C. Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review 2005, 99:315-325.
  • Tuffe E. Political control of the economy 1978, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Veiga L.G., Veiga F.J. Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice 2007, 131:45-64.
  • Wang X., Dennis L., Tu Y.S. Measuring financial condition: A study of U.S. states. Public Budgeting and Finance 2007, 27:1-21.
  • Wildavsky A.B. Party discipline under federalism: Implication of the Australian experience. American federalism in perspective 1967, 162-181. Little, Brown, Boston, MA. A.B. Wildavsky (Ed.).