Implicación y rendimiento en Físicael papel de las estrategias docentes en el aula y el interés personal y situacional del alumnado

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ainley, M., Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities (2012) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 283-302. , In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), New York: Springer
• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., Interest and enjoyment (2014) International Handbook of Emotions in Education, pp. 205-227. , In R. Pekrun & L. Linnembrink- García (Eds.), New York: Routledge
• Anderman, E., Sinatra, G., Gray, D., The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners (2012) Studies in Science Education, 48 (1), pp. 89-117
• Arbuckle, J., (2013) AMOS 22, , User’s Guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation
• Assor, A., Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy (2012) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 421-439. , In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), New York: Springer
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Roth, G., Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork (2002) British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, pp. 261-278
• Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., Connell, J., Teacher as Social Context (TASC) (1992) Two Measures of Teacher Provision of Involvement, Structure, and Autonomy Support (Student Report), , Technical Report, University of Rochester, NY
• Belo, N., Van Driel, J., Van Veen, K., Verloop, N., Beyond the dichotomy of teacher- versus student-focused education: A survey on physics teachers’ beliefs about the goals and pedagogy of physics education (2014) Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, pp. 89-101
• Black, A., Deci, E., The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective (2000) Science Education, 84, pp. 740-756
• Brislin, R., The wording and translation of research instruments (1986) Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research, pp. 137-164. , In W. Lonner & J. Berry (Eds.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
• Byrne, B., Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications (2010) And Programming, , New York: Routledge
• Darby, L., Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy (2005) Research in Science Education, 35, pp. 425-445
• García-Bacete, F., Ferrá, P., Monjas, I., Marande, G., Las relaciones del profesorado con el alumnado en aulas del ciclo inicial de Educación Primaria. Adaptación del Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction-Early Primary (QTI-EP) (2014) Revista De Psicodidáctica, 19 (1), pp. 211-231
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Erson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis, , New Jersey: Pearson
• Hampden-Thompson, G., Bennett, J., Science teaching and learning activities and student engagement in science (2013) International Journal of Science Education, 35, pp. 1325-1341
• Hidi, S., Renninger, K., The fourphase model of interest development (2006) Educational Psychologist, 41, pp. 111-127
• Hulleman, C., Godes, O., Hendricks, B., Harackiewicz, J., Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention (2010) Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (4), pp. 880-895
• PISA 2012 (2013) Programa Para La evaluación Internacional De Los Alumnos. Informe español, 1. , INEE (Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa), Madrid: Ministerio de Educación
• Jang, H., Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity (2008) Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (4), pp. 798-811
• Jang, H., Kim, E., Reeve, J., Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally-occurring classroom context (2012) Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (4), pp. 1175-1188
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., Deci, E., Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure (2010) Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (3), pp. 588-600
• Katz, I., Assor, A., When choice motivates and when it does not (2007) Educational Psychology Review, 19, 429-, p. 442
• Kenny, D., Kashy, D., Bolger, N., Data analysis in social psychology (1998) Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 233-265. , In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), New York: McGraw- Hill
• Klug, J., Krause, N., Schober, B., Finsterwald, M., Spiel, C., How do teachers promote their students’ lifelong learning in class? Development and first application of the LLL Interview (2014) Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, pp. 119-129
• Krapp, A., Prenzel, M., Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings (2011) International Journal of Science Education, 33, pp. 27-50
• Lawson, M., Lawson, H., New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice (2013) Review of Educational Research, 83 (3), pp. 432-479
• Linnenbrink-García, L., Durik, A., Conley, A., Barron, K., Tauer, J., Karabenick, S., Harackiewicz, J., Measuring situational interest in academic domains (2010) Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, pp. 647-671
• Linnenbrink-García, L., Patall, E., Messersmith, E., Antecedents and consequences of situational interest (2013) British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 591-614
• Logan, M., Skamp, K., The impact of teachers and their science teaching on students’ “science interest”: A four-year study (2013) International Journal of Science Education, 35 (17), pp. 2879-2904
• Morge, L., Toczek, M., Chakroun, N., A training programme on managing science interactions: Its impact on teachers’ practices and on their pupils’ achievement (2010) Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (3), pp. 415-426
• Oon, P., Subramaniam, R., On the declining interest in physics among students-from the perspective of teachers (2011) International Journal of Science Education, 33 (5), pp. 727-746
• Ornek, F., Robinson, W., Haugan, M., What makes physics difficult? (2008) International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3 (1), pp. 30-34
• Pianta, R., Hamre, B., Allen, J., Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions (2012) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 365-386. , In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), New York: Springer
• Reeve, J., Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive (2009) Educational Psychologist, 44 (3), pp. 159-175
• Reeve, J., How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement (2013) Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (3), pp. 579-595
• Renninger, K., Hidi, S., Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest (2011) Educational Psychologist, 46 (3), pp. 168-184
• Roorda, D., Koomen, H., Split, J., Oort, F., The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach (2011) Review of Educational Research, 81 (4), pp. 493-529
• Ros, I., La implicación del estudiante con la escuela (2009) Revista De Psicodidáctica, 14, pp. 79-92
• Ros, I., Goikoetxea, J., Gairín, J., Lekue, P., Implicación del alumnado en la escuela: Diferencias individuales e intercentros (2012) Revista De Psicodidáctica, 17 (2), pp. 291-307
• Rotgans, J., Schmidt, H., Situational interest and achievement in the active-learning classroom (2011) Learning and Instruction, 21, pp. 58-67
• Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., Bresó, E., How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety (2010) Stress & Coping, 23 (1), pp. 53-70
• Sánchez-Oliva, D., Viladrich, C., Amado, D., González-Ponce, I., García-Calvo, T., Predicción de los componentes positivos en educación física: Una perspectiva desde la Teoría de la Autodeterminación (2014) Revista De Psicodidáctica, 19 (2), pp. 387-406
• Schiefele, U., Situational and individual interest (2009) Handbook of Motivation at School, pp. 197-222. , In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), London: Routledge
• Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., Kinderman, T., Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? (2008) Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, pp. 765-781
• Skinner, E., Kinderman, T., Furrer, C., A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Con and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in the academic activities in the classroom (2009) Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, pp. 493-525
• Stefanou, C., Perencevich, K., Dicintio, M., Turner, J., Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership (2004) Educational Psychologist, 39 (2), pp. 97-110
• Su, Y., Reeve, J., A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy (2011) Educational Psychology Review, 23, pp. 159-188
• Tsai, Y., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Ryan, R., Trautwein, U., What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three subjects (2008) Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (2), pp. 460-472
• Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., Dchy, F., Mouratidis, A., Beyers, W., Identifying configurations of perceived teacher autonomy support and structure: Associations with self-regulated learning, motivation, and problem behavior (2012) Learning and Instruction, 22, pp. 431-439
• Venturini, P., The contribution of the theory of relation to knowledge to understanding students’ engagement in learning physics (2007) International Journal of Science Education, 29 (9), pp. 1065-1088