Las Agencias de Viajes ante la influencia de las Redes Sociales en el turismoel caso de Ourense

  1. Laura Rodríguez Cid 1
  2. José-Antonio Fraiz Brea 1
  3. David Ramos Valcárcel 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo (España)
Revista:
Pasos: Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural

ISSN: 1695-7121

Año de publicación: 2015

Título del ejemplar: The constant Evolution of Tourism: Innovation, technology, new products and experiences

Volumen: 13

Número: 4

Páginas: 829-836

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.25145/J.PASOS.2015.13.057 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRIULL editor

Otras publicaciones en: Pasos: Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The traditional tourism model has changed with the appearance of new technologies. The traditional marketing tools used by Travel Agencies are disappearing, giving way to improved methods of marketing to promote tourism products which are based on the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). Buying habits have changed due to the fast development of the Internet in the last 10 years. With Web 1.0, websites were static and not very interactive but now Web 2.0 allows content creation and on‑line communication between users as creators and consumers of information. In recent years, tourism companies have begun to create direct marketing channels with the client to avoid dealing with intermediaries, to improve efficiency and to reduce costs. This allowed users to book a trip or a tourism service by themselves through the network and at a significantly lower price. Advice previously found in Travel Agencies is now provided by users who have used the service and whose experience brings an unique and different point of view. This whole phenomenon has forced Travel Agencies into the background because now the tourist is more experienced, more informed and familiar with these new tools born from the Web 2.0. Although interaction between the customer and the travel agent generates added value, many traditional Travel Agencies have closed their businesses and could disappear as they are known today. However, many possibilities could be opened to them if they adapt to the current market, an environment which encourages the use of new technologies from Web 2.0 to Social Networks to keep and attract new customers.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, Paul 2007. “What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education”. JISC Technologies and Standards Watch.
  • Aruguete, G. 2001. Redes sociales. Una propuesta organizacional alternativa.
  • Boyd, D.; Ellison, N. 2008. “Social Network Sites: Definition, History and Scholarship”. Journal of Computer -ediated communication, 13: 210–230.
  • Chung, Y. J.; Buhalis, D. 2008. “Information needs in online social networks”. Information Technology & Tourism, 10, (4): 267 -281.
  • De Vicente, J.L. 2005. La Inteligencia Colectiva en la Web 2.0.Creación e Inteligencia Colectiva, catálogo del Séptimo Festival Zemos 98: 95 -100
  • Granovetter, Mark 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360 -1380.
  • Jeacle, i.; Carter, c. 2011. “In TripAdvisor we trust: Rankings, calculative regimes and abstract system. Accounting, Organizations and Society 36: 293–309.
  • Mildgram, Stanley. 1967. “The Small -World Problem”. Psychology Today, 1(1): 60 -67
  • . O’reilly, Tim. 2006. What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.
  • O’Reilly Media Network. Súarez y Alonso, Ramón c. 2007. Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación: Introducción a los Sistemas de Información y de Telecomunicación. Vigo: Ideaspropias Editorial.
  • VVogeler Ruiz, c.; Hernández Armand, E. 2000. El Mercado Turístico: Estructura, Operaciones y Procesos de Producción (1ª ed.). Madrid: Editorial Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet