Percepción sobre el plagio académico de estudiantes universitarios españoles

  1. Violeta Cebrián-Robles 1
  2. Manuela Raposo-Rivas 1
  3. Manuel Cebrián-de-la-Serna 2
  4. José Antonio Sarmiento-Campos 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  2. 2 Universidad de Málaga
    info

    Universidad de Málaga

    Málaga, España

    ROR https://ror.org/036b2ww28

Revista:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X,  2174-5374

Ano de publicación: 2018

Volume: 21

Número: 2

Páxinas: 105-129

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5944/EDUCXX1.20062 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Resumo

Increasingly digitalized teaching and learning processes have turned the Internet into the main source of information in universities. The ease of access to information can be accompanied by fraudulent practices such as plagiarism. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to discover the origin of the reasons and motivations that Spanish university students have, as well as to establish a model that allows them to be categorized and that provides a theoretical explanation for the empirical data. With a causal correlational research design and using an ad hoc questionnaire as an instrument of measurement, to investigate which practices they consider to be dishonest, if they have ever carried out these practices and the main reason for this. 461 university students in Education (degree and master’s degree) at five Spanish universities participated in the study. From the exploratory factor analysis, one factor is identified relative to the concept of plagiarism, two about what they do, and three factors about why they do it. With this, a confirmatory factor analysis is performed on the empirical model based on the type of relationship that, according to the students, occurs between the concept of plagiarism and its constituent elements, the actions considered plagiarism carried out by these students and the various reasons for carrying them out. A model is obtained according to the statistical indices: standardized Chi square (1.9), goodness of fit (0.97), goodness of corrected fit (0.97), comparative fit (0.95), mean quadratic approximation error (0.04) and Akaike’s informative criterion, which is lower than the independent model. It concludes by identifying a pattern in which, despite knowing what «plagiarism» is and its consequences, three interrelated reasons are justified for plagiarism: «internal» to the person, «external» to them and lack of motivation and interest in the task.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Proyecto I+D+i titulado Estudio del impacto de las e-rúbricas federadas en la evaluación de las competencias en el Practicum (2014-2017). Financiado por la convocatoria de Excelencia del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, n.° EDU2103-41974-P.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adam, L., Anderson, V. & Spronken-Smith, R. (2017). ‘It’s not fair’: Policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university. Higher Education, 74(1), 17-32. 10.1007/s10734-016-0025-9
  • Adam, L. (2016). Student perspectives on plagiarism. In T. Bretag (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. (pp.519-533). Singapore: Springer.
  • Amiri, F., & Razmjoo, S. (2016). On iranian EFL undergraduate students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(2), 115-131. 10.1007/s10805-015-9245-3
  • Balbuena, S.E., & Lamela, R.A. (2015). Prevalence, motives and views of academic dishonesty in Higher Education. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 69-75.
  • Batista_Foguet, J.M. y Coenders, G. (2000). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Madrid: La Muralla.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological bulletin, 112(3), 400.
  • Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer. Bollen, K.A. & Long, J.S. [Eds.] (1989) Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Caldevilla Domínguez, D. (2010). Internet como fuente de información para el alumnado universitario. Cuadernos de Documentación Multimedia, 21, 141-157. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/CtEqn6
  • Cavanillas, S. (2008). El ciberplagio en la normativa universitaria. En: R. Comas-Forgas & J. Sureda-Negre (coords.). (2008). El ciberplagi acadèmic [dossier en línia]. Digithum, 10. UOC. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/7XqONt
  • Cebrián-Robles, V., Raposo-Rivas, M., & Sarmiento-Campos, J.A. (2016). ¿Ética o prácticas deshonestas? el plagio en las titulaciones de educación. Revista de Educación, 374, 161-186.10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2016-374-330
  • Chang, S. (2009). El derecho de autor en el aula- Mío, tuyo, suyo. Revista de la OMPI, 1. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/XxJjtN
  • Chankova, M. (2017). Dealing with Students´ Plagiarism Pre-Emptively Through Teaching Proper Information Exploitation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 4.
  • Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J., (2010). Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors from Students’ Perspective. J. Acad Ethics, 8, 217-232. 10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0
  • Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2007). Ciber-plagio académico. Una aproximación al estado de los conocimientos. Revista Textos de la CiberSociedad, 10. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/FegNp2
  • Cosma, G., Joy, M., Sinclair, J., Andreou, M., Zhang, D., Cook, B., & Boyatt, R. (2017). Perceptual comparison of source-code plagiarism within students from UK, China, and South Cyprus higher education institutions. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(2), 8.
  • Curran, P.J., West, S.G. & Finch, J.F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods 1, 16-29.
  • Dalal, N. (2015). Responding to plagiarism using reflective means. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(1), 4.10.1007/s40979-015-0002-6
  • Díaz-Emparanza, I. (1996). Selecting the Number of Replications in a Simulation Study. Working Paper 1996-1. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/WNB2dr. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1582
  • Do Ba, K.; Do Ba, K.; Lam, Q.D.; Le, Dao Thanh Binh An; Nguyen, P.L.; Nguyen, P.Q. & Pham, Q.L. (2017). Student plagiarism in higher education in Vietnam: An empirical study. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(5), 934-13.10.1080/07294360.2016.1263829
  • Eaton, S., Guglielmin, M., & Otoo, B. (2017). Plagio: Pasar de enfoques punitivos a proactivos. En A.P. Preciado Babb, L. Yeworiew & S. Sabbaghan (Eds.). Actas Seleccionadas de la Conferencia IDEAS 2017: Liderando la Conferencia sobre Cambio Educativo (pp. 28-36). Calgary, Canadá: Werklund School of Education, Universidad de Calgary.
  • Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R.J. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Ratón, Flo.: CRC Press. Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students’ attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 231-246. 10.1080/03075079.2014.927850
  • Ennam, A. (2017). Systematic Analysis of the Effects of Digital Plagiarism on Scientific Research: Investigating the Moroccan Context--Ibn Tofail University as Case Study. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(2), 133-141.
  • Fish, R., & Hura, G. (2013). Students’ perceptions of plagiarism. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 33-45.
  • Guerrero, P., Mercado, J. & Marina, L. (2017). La deshonestidad, elemento que altera la integridad en las prácticas académicas en las Instituciones de Educación Superior. Estudios de caso comparados. Investigación y formación pedagógica. Revista del Ciegc. 0(5), 6-25. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/qTbHAi
  • Guerrero, P., Marina, L. & Mercado, J. (2016). Los indicadores de calidad y su relación con la ética en la producción académica. Estudio de casos comparados. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 7(13), 197-219.
  • Gullifer, J.M. & Tyson, G.A. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students´understanding of plagiarism, Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202-1218, 10.1080/03075079.2013-777412
  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis Multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Hall, R.J., Snell, A.F., & Singer Foust, M., (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subíle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233-256.
  • Hayes, N., & Introna, L.D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics & Behavior, 15(3), 213-231. 10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2
  • Heckler, N.C., Forde, D.R., & Bryan, C.H. (2013). Using writing assignment designs to mitigate plagiarism. Teaching Sociology, 41(1), 94-105. 10.1177/0092055X12461471
  • Hernández, R., Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGrawHill.
  • Huh, J., Delorme, D.E., & Reid, L.N. (2006), Perceived Third-Person Effects and Consumer Attitudes on Prevetting and Banning DTC Advertising. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 40, 90-116.
  • Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M., (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
  • Hu, G., & Sun, X. (2017). Institutional policies on plagiarism: The case of eight Chinese universities of foreign languages/international studies. System, 66, 56-68. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/Ne3qZk
  • Kerlinger, F. & Lee, H. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento. México: McGrawHill/Interamericana.
  • Khoshsaligheh, M., Mehdizadkhani, M., & Keyvan, S. (2017). Severity of Types of Violations of Research Ethics: Perception of Iranian Master’s Students of Translation. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(2), 125-140.
  • Kokkinaki, A., Demoliou, C., & Iakovidou, M. (2015). Students’ perceptions of plagiarism and relevant policies in Cyprus. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(1), 1-11. 10.1007/s40979-015-0001-7
  • Kuntz, J.R. C., & Butler, C. (2014). Exploring individual and contextual antecedents of attitudes toward the acceptability of cheating and plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 24(6), 478-494. 10.1080/10508422.2014.908380
  • Lau, G.K.K., Yuen, A.H.K., & Park, J. (2013). Toward an analytical model of ethical decision making in plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 23(5), 360-377. 10.1080/10508422.2013.787360
  • Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., y Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3). https://doi. org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
  • López, J., (2014). Analyzing and reducing plagiarism at university. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7(2), 131-140.
  • McGowan, S., & Lightbody, M. (2008). Enhancing students’ understanding of plagiarism within a discipline context. Accounting Education, 17(3), 273-290. 10.1080/09639280701612168
  • Montecinos, A. (2013). Plagio y ética de la investigación científica/Plagiarism and ethics of scientific research. Revista Chilena De Derecho, 40(2), 711-726. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/Tch8Vf
  • Ochoa, L. & Cueva, A (2016). Percepciones de estudiantes acerca del plagio. Encuentros, 14 (2), pp.25-41. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/qgwSkV
  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488. 10.1080/02602930301677
  • Perelló, S.(2009). Metodología de la Investigación Social. Madrid: Dykinson S.L.
  • Ramírez-Barreto, A.C. (2017). El plagio académico. experiencias y algunas ideas para desalentarlo de manera más efectiva. Ciencia Nicolaita, 70, 7-22. Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/c5LwQM
  • Real Academia Española. (2001). Diccionario de la lengua española (23.ª ed.). Madrid: RAE.
  • Revelle, W. (2017). Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University. Recuperado de https://goo.gl/oa2Cr8
  • Revelle, W. & Zinbarg, R.E. (2009) Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154.
  • Revelle, W. & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very Simple Structure: an Alternative Procedure for Estimating the Optimal Number of Interpretable Factors, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 403-414.
  • Revelle, W. (1979). Hierarchical clusteranalysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(1), 57-74.
  • Ruiz, M., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles del psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.
  • Ruipérez, G., & García-Cabrero, J.C. (2016). Plagio e integridad académica en Alemania. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 24(48), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-01
  • Sanvicén Torné, P., & Molina Luque, F. (2015). Efectos del uso de internet como fuente principal de información. Evidencias en estudiantes de primer curso universitario. Prisma Social, (15). Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/
  • zvUtTt
  • Sattler, S., Wiegel, C., & Veen, F.V. (2017). The use frequency of 10 different methods for preventing and detecting academic dishonesty and the factors influencing their use. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6), 1126-1144.
  • Sattler, S., Graeff, P., & Willem, S. (2013). Explaining the decision to plagiarize: An empirical test of the interplay between rationality, norms, and opportunity. Deviant Behavior, 34(6), 444-463. 10.1080/01639625.2012.735909
  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F.K., Barlow, E.A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of educational research, 99(6), 323-338.
  • Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., & Oliver-Trobat, M.-F. (2015). Plagio académico entre alumnado de secundaria y bachillerato: Diferencias en cuanto al género y la procrastinación. Comunicar, 22(44), 103-111. http://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-11
  • Sureda-Negre, J., Comas-Forgas, R., & Morey, M. (2009). Las causas del plagio académico entre el alumnado universitario según el profesorado. Revista iberoamericana de educación, 50, 197-220.
  • Tayan, B.M. (2016). Academic Misconduct: An Investigation into Male Students’ Perceptions, Experiences & Attitudes towards Cheating and Plagiarism in a Middle Eastern University Context. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 158.
  • Tirado, R., & Aguaded, J. I. (2012). Influencia de las medidas institucionales y de la competencia tecnológica sobre la docencia universitaria a través de plataformas digitales. Relieve, 18(1). Recuperado de: https://goo.gl/5e9BNT
  • Ullman, J.D. (1996). Structural Equation Modellin. In B.G. Tabachnick & L.S. Fidell (eds.) Using multivariate statistics (pp. 709-812). Nueva York: Harper-Collins College Publishers.
  • Velicer, W. (1976) Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
  • Youmans, R. J. (2011). Does the adoption of plagiarism-detection software in higher education reduce plagiarism? Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 749-761. 10.1080/03075079.2010.523457
  • Zarfsaz, E., & Ahmadi, R. (2017). Investigating Some Main Causes and Reasons of Writing Plagiarism in an EFL Context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(5), 214-223.
  • Zrnec, A., & Lavbicˇ, D. (2017). Social network aided plagiarism detection. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 113-128. 10.1111/bjet.12345
Fonte de datos: Dialnet