Aplicación de técnicas Lean Construction a través de un método de Action Research en los procesos de gestión de una empresa constructora

  1. M. Fernández Vázquez-Noguerol
  2. M. Rodríguez-García
  3. J.C. Prado-Prado
Revista:
Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

ISSN: 1132-175X

Ano de publicación: 2018

Número: 65

Páxinas: 90-103

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.37610/DYO.V0I65.530 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

En este artículo, se desarrolla un método de Action Research para implementar técnicas de Lean Construction en los procesos de gestión de una empresa constructora. A través de la creación de equipos formados por profesionales de distintas áreas, se busca definir e implementar diferentes mejoras. Nuestra investigación se divide en tres fases: captación de datos, definición de las líneas de actuación e implementación y seguimiento del plan de actuación. Los resultados de nuestro estudio sugieren que la colaboración entre los diferentes departamentos ayuda a lograr un cambio empresarial significativo y a potenciar la implementación de la filosofía Lean Construction.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 1. Aguilar, G. E., & Hewage, K. N. (2013). IT based system for construction safety management and monitoring: C-RTICS 2. Automation in Construction, 35, 217-228.
  • 2. Alshawi, M., & Ingirige, B. (2003). Web-enabled project management: an emerging paradigm in construction. Automation in construction, 12(4), 349-364.
  • 3. Azambuja, M., & O’Brien, W. J. (2009). Construction supply chain modeling: issues and perspectives. Construction supply chain management handbook, 1.
  • 4. Ballard, H. G. (2000). The last planner system of production control (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
  • 5. Berner, F., Hermes, M., Lange, S., & Graeser, D. (2016). Lean Construction in the logistics of underground and road construction Optimization of construction in constricted conditions. BAUINGENIEUR, 91, 166-171.
  • 6. Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why Action Research?.
  • 7. Cárdenas, L. F. A., & Armiñana, E. P. (2009). Un nuevo enfoque en la gestión: la construcción sin pérdidas. Revista de Obras Públicas, 46.
  • 8. Choma, J., Zaina, L. A., & Da Silva, T. S. (2015, September). Towards an Approach Matching CMD and DSR to Improve the Academia-Industry Software Development Partnership: A Case of Agile and UX Integration. In Software Engineering (SBES), 2015 29th Brazilian Symposium on (pp. 51-60). IEEE.
  • 9. Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2002). Action research for operations management. International journal of operations & production management, 22(2), 220-240.
  • 10. Dave, B. (2017). Business process management–a construction case study. Construction Innovation, 17(1), 50-67.
  • 11. Dave, B., Kubler, S., Främling, K., & Koskela, L. (2016). Opportunities for enhanced Lean Construction management using Internet of Things standards. Automation in Construction, 61, 86-97.
  • 12. Eastman, C. M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., & Sacks, R. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. John Wiley & Sons.
  • 13. Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking construction, construction task force report for department of the environment, transport and the regions. ed: HMSO, London.
  • 14. Eshtehardian, E., Ghodousi, P., & Bejanpour, A. (2013). Using ANP and AHP for the supplier selection in the construction and civil engineering companies; case study of Iranian company. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(2), 262-270.
  • 15. Fagundes, L. D., Amorim, E. S., & da Silva Lima, R. (2017). Action research in reverse logistics for end-of-life tire recycling. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(5), 553-568.
  • 16. Farooq, S., & O'Brien, C. (2015). An Action Research methodology for manufacturing technology selection: a supply chain perspective. Production Planning & Control, 26(6), 467-488.
  • 17. Gutierrez, D. M., Scavarda, L. F., Fiorencio, L., & Martins, R. A. (2015). Evolution of the performance measurement system in the Logistics Department of a broadcasting company: An Action Research. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 1-12.
  • 18. Haj-Bolouri, A., Bernhardsson, L., & Rossi, M. (2016). PADRE: A Method for Participatory Action Design Research. In Tackling Society's Grand Challenges with Design Science: 11th International Conference, DESRIST 2016, St. John’s, NL, Canada, May 23-25, 2016, Proceedings 11 (pp. 19-36). Springer International Publishing.
  • 19. Harvey, M. (2003). Privatization, fragmentation and inflexible flexibilization in the UK construction industry. Building chaos: An international comparison of deregulation in the construction industry, 188-209.
  • 20. Henrich, G., Tilley, P., & Koskela, L. (2005). Context of production control in construction.
  • 21. Herranz Limon, D. (2015). Measuring Lean Construction-A Performance Measurement model supporting the implementation of Lean practices in the Norwegian construction industry (Master's thesis, NTNU).
  • 22. Hjalmarsson, A., Rudmark, D., & Lind, M. (2010). When designers are not in control–experiences from using Action Research to improve researcher-developer collaboration in design science research. Global perspectives on design science research, 1-15.
  • 23. Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., Aouad, G., & Sexton, M. (2000). Rethinking construction: the generic design and construction process protocol. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 7(2), 141-153.
  • 24. Kaipia, R., Holmström, J., Småros, J., & Rajala, R. (2017). Information sharing for sales and operations planning: contextualized solutions and mechanisms. Journal of Operations Management.
  • 25. Kymmell, W. (2007). Building Information Modeling: Planning and Managing Construction Projects with 4D CAD and Simulations (McGraw-Hill Construction).
  • 26. Koch, C. (2005). Failures in combined knowledge and material supply chains. In International Engineering Management Conference. IEEE.
  • 27. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs.
  • 28. Koskela, Lauri (1992). Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction. Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, USA.
  • 29. Kumaraswamy, m. m. (1999). Profiting from harmony—in construction procurement and management. Profitable Partnering in Construction Procurement, 85-92.
  • 30. Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the team: final report: joint review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the United Kingdom construction industry. HMSO Books.
  • 31. Laufer, A., & Tucker, R. L. (1987). Is construction project planning really doing its job? A critical examination of focus, role and process. Construction Management and Economics, 5(3), 243-266.
  • 32. McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of management journal, 44(1), 118-131.
  • 33. McManners, P. (2016). The Action Research case study approach: A methodology for complex challenges such as sustainability in aviation. Action ResearchAction Research, 14(2), 201-216.
  • 34. Paim, R., Mansur Caulliraux, H., & Cardoso, R. (2008). Process management tasks: a conceptual and practical view. Business Process Management Journal, 14(5), 694-723.
  • 35. Ponz Tienda, J. L., Benlloch Marco, J., Andrés Romano, C., & SENABRE, D. (2011). Un algoritmo matricial RUPSP/GRUPSP" sin interrupción" para la planificación de la producción bajo metodología Lean Construction basado en procesos productivos. Revista de la Construcción, 10(2), 90-103.
  • 36. Rydenfält, C., Larsson, P. A., & Odenrick, P. (2017). An action-oriented method for interprofessional organization development at a hospital operating unit. Action ResearchAction Research, 15(2), 177-197.
  • 37. Sacks, R., Radosavljevic, M., & Barak, R. (2010). Requirements for building information modeling based Lean production management systems for construction. Automation in construction, 19(5), 641-655.
  • 38. Sarhan, S., & Fox, A. (2012). Trends and challenges to the development of a Lean culture among UK construction organisations'. In Proceedings for the 20th Annual Conference of the IGLC (pp. 1151-1160).
  • 39. Sarkar, S., Lakha, V., Ansari, I., & Maiti, J. (2017). Supplier Selection in Uncertain Environment: A Fuzzy MCDM Approach. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Communication (pp. 257-266). Springer Singapore.
  • 40. Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Vasiljević, M., Stojić, G., & Korica, S. (2017). Novel Integrated Multi-Criteria Model for Supplier Selection: Case Study Construction Company. Symmetry, 9(11), 279.
  • 41. Sunding, L., & Odenrick, P. (2010). A method for Action Research interventions to improve joint problem solving in operational teams in the Swedish construction industry. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(1), 97-123.
  • 42. Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2013). Multi-criteria risk assessment of a construction project. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 129-133.
  • 43. Tamošaitienė, J., Zavadskas, E. K., Šileikaitė, I., & Turskis, Z. (2017). A novel hybrid MCDM approach for complicated supply chain management problems in construction. Procedia Engineering, 172, 1137-1145.
  • 44. Teicholz, P., Goodrum, P. M., & Haas, C. T. (2001). US construction labor productivity trends, 1970–1998. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(5), 427-429.
  • 45. Tezel, B. A. (2011). Visual management: an exploration of the concept and its implementation in construction (Doctoral dissertation, Salford: University of Salford).
  • 46. Tezel, A., Koskela, L., & Aziz, Z. (2017). Current condition and future directions for Lean Construction in highways projects: a small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) perspective. International Journal of Project Management.
  • 47. Urueña, J. F. C. (2011). Modelos de Integración de la Gestión de la Cadena de Suministro en el Sector de la Construcción. Dirección y Organización, (43), 51-63.
  • 48. van Aken, J., Chandrasekaran, A., & Halman, J. (2016). Conducting and publishing design science research: Inaugural essay of the design science department of the Journal of Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, 47, 1-8.
  • 49. Wheelan, S. A. (2014). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders. Sage Publications.
  • 50. Wolstenholme, A., Austin, S. A., Bairstow, M., Blumenthal, A., Lorimer, J., McGuckin, S., ... & Guthrie, W. (2009). Never waste a good crisis: a review of progress since Rethinking Construction and thoughts for our future.
  • 51. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods.
  • 52. Zavadskas, E. K., Vainiūnas, P., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2012). Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(02), 501-520
  • 53. Zolfani, S. H., Chen, I. S., Rezaeiniya, N., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2012). A hybrid MCDM model encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran. Technological and economic development of economy, 18(3), 529-543.