La residencia¿criterio legítimo de distinción entre obligación personal y obligación real en la unión europea?
ISSN: 1578-0244
Ano de publicación: 2019
Título do exemplar: Residencia fiscal : problemática y cuestiones actuales
Número: 6
Tipo: Documento de traballo
Outras publicacións en: Documentos - Instituto de Estudios Fiscales
Referencias bibliográficas
- BARDINI, C. (2010): “The ability to pay in the European Market: an impossible sudoku for the ECJ”, Intertax, vol. 38, nº 1, pp. 2-20.
- BERLIRI, A. (1964) : Principios de Derecho tributario (trad. F. Vicente Arche), vol. I, Edersa, Madrid, pp. 151- 152.
- CAVELTI, L.; JAAG, C. y ROHNER, T. F. (2017): “Why corporate taxation means source taxation: a response to the OECD's actions against base erosion and profit shifting”, World Tax Journal, vol. 9, nº 3, pp. 352-390.
- DUARDO SÁNCHEZ, A. (2017): “Crisis de los puntos de conexión en la fiscalidad internacional. La residencia fiscal y el establecimiento permanente a la luz del Plan BEPS”, Revista Quincena Fiscal, nº 12.
- GRAETZ, M. y O’HEAR, O. (1997): “The «original intent» of U.S. international taxation”, Duke Law Journal, vol. 46, pp. 1021-1109.
- MALHERBE, J.; MALHERBE, P.; RICHELLE, I.; TRAVERSA, E. y DE LAVELEY, D. (2011): The impact of the rulings of the European Court of Justice in the area of direct taxation, Parlamento Europeo.
- MOLENAAR, D. (2005): Taxation of international performing artistes, vol. 10, Doctoral Series, IBFD, Ámsterdam.
- ONU (2003): Manual for the negotiation of bilateral tax treaties between developed and developing countries, Organización de las Naciones Unidas, Nueva York.
- PETRONE, F. (2016): “Tax residence of individuals within the European Union: finding new solutions to old problems”, World Tax Journal, vol. 8, nº 3, pp. 358-377.
- ROSENBLOOM, D. (2015): “Reflections on the intersection of U.S. Tax Treaty Policy, U.S Tax Reform and BEPS”, Tax Notes International, mayo 25.
- SZAFRAN, D. (1995): “La distinction fondée sur la notion de résidence et le principe de non-discrimination en matière fiscale dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne”, Journal de Droit Fiscal.
- TOVAR PALOMO, C. E. (2015): “Optional regimes as a remedy to discriminatory treatment”, en Dziurdz K. y Marchgraber, C.: Non-discrimination in European and Tax Treaty Law, Linde, Viena, pp. 267-284.
- VANN, R. J. (2010):“Taxing International Business Income: Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World”, World Tax Journal, vol. 2, nº 3, Journals IBFD.
- WATTEL, P. (2008-2009): “Commentary. Judicial restraint and three trends in the ECJ’s direct tax case law”, Tax Law Review, vol. 62, pp. 205-220.
- WATTEL, P. y TERRA. B. (2012): European Tax Law, 6ª edición, Kluwer Law Internacional, Alphen aan den Rijn.
- WEBER, D. (2006): “In search of a (new) equilibrium between tax sovereignty and freedom of movement within the EC”, Intertax, vol. 34, nº 12.
- WEBER, D. (2007): “Is the limitation of tax jurisdiction a restriction of the freedom of movement?”, en Lang, M. y Vanistendael, F.: Accounting and taxation & Assessment of ECJ case law, EATLP International Tax Law Series – Vol. 5, IBFD, Ámsterdam.