Water-bath stunning process in broiler chickens:Effects of voltage and intensity

  1. Novoa, Martin 2
  2. Vázquez, Luis 1
  3. Lage, Almudena 2
  4. González-Torres, Inmaculada 1
  5. Pérez-García, Luis F. 1
  6. Cobas, Noemi 1
  7. Lorenzo, Jose M. 1
  1. 1 Centro Tecnolóxico de Carne de Galicia
  2. 2 COREN, Sociedad Cooperativa Galega, Orense
Revista:
Spanish journal of agricultural research

ISSN: 1695-971X,  2171-9292

Ano de publicación: 2019

Volume: 17

Número: 2

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/2019172-14576 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Spanish journal of agricultural research

Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable

Resumo

The effect of electrical parameters (intensity and voltage) to obtain an effective water-bath stunning in a commercial poultry slaughterhouse was studied. A total of 390 broilers were randomly divided into six experimental groups according to the intensity (150 and 200 mA) and voltage (51-60, 61-80 and 81-100 V). Statistical analysis showed a significant (p<0.001) effect of electrical parameters on the cloacal reflex since the response rate was 8 s for 96% of broilers. On the other hand, the stunning treatments suppressed the palpebral reflex up to 12 s in 80% of broilers. All stun-treated broilers showed breathing response after 27 s with an average time between 45 and 50 s depending on voltage and intensity of the current. Regarding voltage, the percentage of complete neck cutting increased with the increase of voltage, presenting the highest levels in broilers stunned at 81-100 V (100 and 92.8%, for 150 and 200 mA, respectively). Concerning to intensity, the best results were obtained in broilers stunned at 150 mA, showing mean percentages of 94.83 and 87.30%, for 150 and 200 mA, respectively. The bruises on wings were significantly (p<0.001) affected by voltage, observing the highest values in broilers slaughtered at lower voltages. An opposite trend was observed on bruises under the wings since the lowest voltages showed (p<0.001) lower levels (1.34 and 1.42%, for 150 and 200 mA, respectively). Finally, bruises on dorsal winds and on back were significantly (p<0.001) influenced by intensity level, showing the lowest percentages in broilers stunned at 150 mA.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ali ASA, Lawson MA, Tauson AH, Fris Jensen J, Chwalibog A, 2007. Influence of electrical stunning voltages on bleed out and carcass quality in slaughtered broiler chickens. Arch Geflugelkd 71 (1): 35-40.
  • Barbosa RL, Adamczuk GO, Dvojatzki P, Trentin MG, Lima JD, 2016. Efficiency of electrical stunning by electronarcosis: Current situation and perspective of improvement in a medium-size processing plant. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 18 (2): 331-336.
  • Berg C, Raj M, 2015. A review of different stunning methods for poultry-Animal welfare aspects (stunning methods for poultry). Animals 5 (4): 1207-1219.
  • Bilgili SF, 1992. Electrical stunning of broilers-basic concepts and carcass quality implications: A review. J Appl Poult Res 1 (1): 135-146.
  • Bilgili SF, 1999. Recent advances in electrical stunning. Poult Sci 78 (2): 282-286.
  • Bourassa DV, Bowker BC, Zhuang H, Wilson KM, Harris CE, Buhr RJ, 2017. Impact of alternative electrical stunning parameters on the ability of broilers to recover consciousness and meat quality. Poult Sci 96 (9): 3495-3501.
  • Coenen AML, Prinz S, van Oijen GBM, Bessei W, 2007. A non-invasive technique for measuring the electroencephalogram of broiler chickens in a fast way: the 'chicken EEG clamp' (CHEC). Arch Geflügelk 71 (1): 45-47.
  • Cors JC, Gruber AD, Günther R, Meyer-Kühling B, Esser KH, Rautenschlein S, 2015. Electroencephalographic evaluation of the effectiveness of blunt trauma to induce loss of consciousness for on-farm killing of chickens and turkeys. Poult Sci 94 (2): 147-155.
  • EC, 2009. Council Regulation of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, 1099/2009/EC. European Commission, Official Journal, L303, 18.11.2009.
  • Erasmus MA, Turner PV, Widowski TM, 2010. Measures of insensibility used to determine effective stunning and killing of poultry. J Appl Poult Res 19 (3): 288-298.
  • Faucitano L, Martelli G, Nannoni E, Widowski T, 2017. Fundamentals of animal welfare in meat animals and consumer attitudes to animal welfare. In: New aspects of meat quality pp: 537-568. Woodhead Publishing.
  • Gazdziak S, 2007. Kill floor improvements: Automation on the poultry kill and eviscerating lines is increasing efficiency and product quality. The National Provisioner 12: 66-68.
  • Gerritzen MA, Lambooij B, Reimert H, Stegeman A, Spruijt B, 2004. On-farm euthanasia of broiler chickens: effects of different gas mixtures on behavior and brain activity. Poult Sci 83 (8): 1294-1301.
  • Gibson TJ, Taylor AH, Gregory NG, 2016. Assessment of the effectiveness of head only and back-of-the-head electrical stunning of chickens. Br Poult Sci 57 (3): 295-305.
  • Girasole M, Marrone R, Anastasio A, Chianese A, Mercogliano R, Cortesi ML, 2016. Effect of electrical water bath stunning on physical reflexes of broilers: evaluation of stunning efficacy under field conditions. Poult Sci 95 (5): 1205-1210.
  • Gregory NG, 1989. Stunning and slaughter. In: Processing of poultry: Mead GC (ed.). pp: 31-63. Elsevier Sci Publ Ltd, Essex, UK.
  • Gregory NG, Wilkins LJ, 1989. Effect of ventricular fibrillation at stunning and ineffective bleeding on carcase quality defects in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 30 (4): 825-829.
  • Hamdy MK, May KN, Flanagan WP, Powers JJ, 1961. Determination of the age of bruises in chicken broilers. Poult Sci 40 (3): 787-789.
  • HAS, 2015. Guidance Notes No.7: Electrical waterbath stunning of poultry. The Humane Slaughter Association and Council of Justice to Animals. Wheathampstead, UK. 104 pp.
  • Heath GBS, 1984. The slaughter of broiler chickens. Worlds Poult Sci J 40 (2): 151-159.
  • Hindle VA, Lambooij E, Reimert, HGM, Workel LD, Gerritzen MA, 2010. Animal welfare concerns during the use of the water bath for stunning broilers, hens, and ducks. Poult Sci 89 (3): 401-412.
  • Mouchoniere M, Le Pottier G, Fernandez X, 1999. The effect of current frequency during waterbath stunning on the physical recovery and rate and extent of bleed out in turkeys. Poult Sci 78 (3): 485-489.
  • Prinz S, Van Oijen G, Ehinger F, Coenen A, Bessei W, 2010. Electroencephalograms and physical reflexes of broilers after electrical waterbath stunning using an alternating current. Poult Sci 89 (6): 1265-1274.
  • Prinz S, Van Oijen G, Ehinger F, Bessei W, Coenen A, 2012. Electrical waterbath stunning: influence of different waveform and voltage settings on the induction of unconsciousness and death in male and female broiler chickens. Poult Sci 91 (4): 998-1008.
  • Raj ABM, Tserveni-Gousi AS, 2000. Stunning methods for poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J 56 (4): 291-304.
  • Sante V, Le Pottier G, Astruc T, Mouchoniere M, Fernandez X, 2000. Effect of stunning current frequency on carcass downgrading and meat quality of turkey. Poult Sci 79 (8): 1208-1214.
  • Shields SJ, Raj ABM, 2010. A critical review of electrical water-bath stun systems for poultry slaughter and recent developments in alternative technologies. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 13 (4): 281-299.
  • Siqueira TS, Borges TD, Rocha RMM, Figueira PT, Luciano FB, Macedo REF, 2017. Effect of electrical stunning frequency and current waveform in poultry welfare and meat quality. Poult Sci 96 (8): 2956-2964.
  • Veerkamp CH, De Vries AW, 1983. Influence of electrical stunning on quality aspects of broilers. In: Stunning of animals for slaughter; Eikelenboom G (ed.). pp: 197-207. Martinus Nijhoff Publ, Boston.
  • Wilkins LJ, Wotton SB, Parkman ID, Kettlewell PJ, Griffiths P, 1999. Constant current stunning effects on bird welfare and carcass quality. J Appl Poult Res 8 (4): 465-471.
  • Wilkins LJ, Brown SN, Phillips AJ, Warriss PD, 2000. Variation in the colour of broiler breast fillets in the UK. Br Poult Sci 41 (3): 308-312.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet