Revisión meta-analítica de la maleabilidad de la memoria mediante ‘crashing memories’

  1. Adriana Selaya 1
  2. Francisca Fariña 1
  3. Dolores Seijo 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago
Book:
Psicología jurídica y forense: Investigación para la práctica profesional XII congreso (inter)nacional de psicología jurídica y forense Madrid, 13, 14 y 15 de febrero de 2020
  1. Ana María Martín (coord.)
  2. Francisca Fariña (coord.)
  3. Ramón Arce (coord.)

Publisher: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense

ISBN: 978-83-956095-9-6

Year of publication: 2020

Pages: 57-68

Congress: Congreso Internacional de psicología jurídica y forense (12. 2020. Madrid)

Type: Conference paper

WoS: WOS:000712205100004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openMINERVA editor

Abstract

With the aim of quantifying the effect of the crashing memories paradigm on the development of false memories a meta-analytic review was planned. For that aim, two searches in the main scientific databases (Web of Science and Scopus) were carried out in order to find all the studies focused in the analysis of crashing memories. A total of 14 primary studies were found, obtaining 17 effect sizes. The results showed a positive and significant mean effect size, and of a magnitude greater than 72.86% of all the possible effects, but non-generalizable i.e., the results are mediated by moderators. Furthermore, the results showed an increase of the 71.93% in the probability that false memories were developed with the crashing memories methodology. The implications of the results for the validity of the court crossed examinations as judicial proof are discussed.

Data source: Dialnet