¿Discriminan los criterios de realidad del CBCA entre memorias visionadas, pero no experimentadas, y fabricadas de un evento? una revisión meta-analítica

  1. Jéssica Sanmarco 1
  2. María José Vázquez 2
  3. Francisca Fariña 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago
  2. 2 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Book:
Psicología jurídica y forense: Investigación para la práctica profesional XII congreso (inter)nacional de psicología jurídica y forense Madrid, 13, 14 y 15 de febrero de 2020
  1. Ana María Martín (coord.)
  2. Francisca Fariña (coord.)
  3. Ramón Arce (coord.)

Publisher: Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense

ISBN: 978-83-956095-9-6

Year of publication: 2020

Pages: 81-91

Congress: Congreso Internacional de psicología jurídica y forense (12. 2020. Madrid)

Type: Conference paper

WoS: WOS:000712205100006 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openMINERVA editor

Abstract

The Criteria Based Content Analysis (CBCA) is the worldwide most used tool for the assessment of the credibility of a testimony in the forensic assessment field. Recent meta-analyses have confirmed that the CBCA reality categories discriminate between memories of fabricated and self-experienced events in adult and child populations and different contexts. However, it has not been studied as a moderator if the categories also discern between fabricated memories based on watched events but not experienced and fabricated memories of an event. Hence, a meta-analysis was performed searching studies with this type of design, finding 5 primary studies from which 6 effect sizes were obtained. The results are uneven, finding from positive to negative and zero effects. The implications of the results for forensic practice and future investigation are discussed

Data source: Dialnet