Adaptación española y propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Parentalidad y Ajuste Familiar (PAFAS)

  1. Francisca Fariña 1
  2. Dolores Seijo 2
  3. David Tomé 1
  4. Bárbara Castro 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Vigo (España)
  2. 2 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (España)
Journal:
Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes

ISSN: 2340-8340

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 8

Issue: 1

Pages: 40-46

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes

Abstract

Spanish adaptation and psychometric properties of Parenting and Family Adjustment Scale (PAFAS). In order to conduct brief and efficient assessments of parental competence, parental-subsidiary relationships and family adjustment, the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) was created with the Parenting Scale and Family subscales Adjustment Scale. The objective of this work is to adapt this questionnaire to the Spanish context to be used for the evaluation of Spanish parental functioning, updating its psychometric properties. The sample consisted of 2618 parents from different socioeconomic backgrounds. The items that were part of the instrument were adapted in agreement with the original authors. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses were used to analyse the structure of the questionnaire. Reliability analyses were then carried out for each of the factors and invariance of the measurement model at both subscales. As a result, an instrument consisting of 20 items, two subscales and five factors was obtained that proved reliable to measure family and parental functioning in Spain. The Parenting Scale made by Coercive parenting (PC), Positive encouragement (EP) and Parent-child relationship (RMP) factors and the Family Adjustment Scale, made by Parental adjustment (AP) and Family adjustment (AF) factors. The instrument obtained makes it possible to measure the parental styles and family adjustment of Spanish parents

Bibliographic References

  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Seijo, D. (2005). Razonamientos judiciales en procesos de separación: Análisis cognitivo y de contenido de las motivaciones [Judicial reasoning in parental separation and divorce proceedings: Content and cognitive analysis of judicial reasoning]. Psicothema, 17(1), 57-63.
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., & Novo, M. (2015). Assessing impression management with the MMPI-2 in child custody litigation. Assessment, 22(6), 769-777. doi: 10.1177/1073191114558111
  • Arias, E., Arce, R., Vázquez, M. J., & Marcos, V. (2020). Treatment efficacy on the cognitive competence of convicted intimate partner violence offenders. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 36(3), 427-435. doi: 10.6018/analesps.428771
  • Baumann, A. A., Powell, B. J., Kohl, P. L., Tabak, R. G., Penalba, V., Proctor, E. K., ..., & Cabassa, L. J. (2015). Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent-training: A systematic review and critique of guiding evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.025
  • Cantero-García, M., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2017). Cuestionario breve de respuesta parental ante el comportamiento disruptivo (RPCD): Perspectiva de los padres. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 689-696. doi: 10.6018/analesps.33.3.266971
  • Carracedo, S., Fariña, F., & Seijo, D. (2018). Children exposed to intimate partner violence: impact assessment and guidelines for intervention. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 5(3), 16-22.
  • Chacko, A., Jensen, S. A., Lowry, L. S., Cornwell, M., Chimklis, A., Chan, E., Lee, D., & Pulgarin, B. (2016). Engagement in behavioral parent training: Review of the literature and implications for practice. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 19(3), 204-215. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0205-2
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodnessof-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5
  • Contreras, L., & Cano, M. C. (2016). Child-to-parent violence: The role of exposure to violence and its relationship to social-cognitive processing. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(2), 43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.03.003
  • Corrás, T., Seijo, D., Fariña, F., Novo, M., Arce, R., & Cabanach, R. G. (2017). What and how much do children lose in academic settings owing to parental separation? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1545. http://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.01545
  • Cutrín, O., Maneiro, L., Sobral, J., & Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. (2019). Longitudinal effects of parenting mediated by deviant peers on violent and non-violent antisocial behaviour and substance use in adolescence. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11(1), 23-32. doi: 10.5093/ejpalc2018a12
  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046
  • Fariña, F., Arce, R., & Real, S. (1994). Ruedas de identificación: De la simulación y la realidad [Lineups: A comparision of high fidelity research and research in a real context]. Psicothema, 6(3), 395-402.
  • Fariña, F., Arce, R., Tomé, D., & Seijo, D. (2020). Validación del Cuestionario Actitud ante el Conflicto Parental: Autoinformada y Referenciada (ACPar) [Validation of the Attitude to Parental Conflict Questionnaire: Self-reported and Referenced (ACPar)]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 11(1), 1-14. doi: 10.23923/j.rips.2020.01.031
  • Fariña, F., Arce, R., Vilariño, M., & Novo, M. (2014). Assessment of the standard forensic procedure for the evaluation of psychological injury in intimate-partner violence. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, e32, 1-10. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.30
  • Fariña, F., Redondo, L., Seijo, D., Novo, M., & Arce, R. (2017). A meta-analytic review of the MMPI validity scales and indexes to detect defensiveness in custody evaluations. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17, 128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.02.002
  • Gallego, R., Novo, M., Fariña, F., & Arce, R. (2019). Child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11(2), 51-59. doi: 10.5093/ejpalc2019a4
  • Gardner, F., Montgomery, P., & Knerr, W. (2016). Transporting evidence-based parenting programs for child problem behavior (age 3–10) between countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(6), 749-762. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1015134
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532-560. doi: 10.1207/ s15327752jpa6803_5
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jiménez-García, P., Contreras, L., & Cano-Lozano, M. C. (2019). Types and intensity of postdivorce conflicts, the exercise of coparenting and its consequences on children. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 10(1), 48-63. doi: 10.23923/j.rips.2019.01.025
  • Kazdin, A. E., Glick, A., Pope, J., Kaptchuk, T. J., Lecza, B., Carrubba, E., McWhinney, E., & Hamilton, N. (2018). Parent management training for conduct problems in children: Enhancing treatment to improve therapeutic change. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18(2), 91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.12.002
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Methodology in the Social Sciences. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Martinón, J. M., Fariña, F., Corrás, T., Seijo, D., Souto, A., & Novo, M. (2017). Impacto de la ruptura de los progenitores en el estado de salud física de los hijos [Impact of parental breakup on the physical health of children]. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 10, 9-14. doi: 10.1016/j. ejeps.2016.10.002
  • Mayorga-Sierra, É., Novo, M., Fariña, F., & Seijo, D. (2020). Needs analysis for the personal, social, and psychological adjustment of adolescents at risk of delinquency and juvenile offenders. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 36(3), 400-407. doi: 10.6018/analesps.428631
  • McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144
  • Mejia, A., Filus, A., Calam, R., Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Measuring parenting practices and family functioning with brief and simple instruments: validation of the Spanish version of the PAFAS. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46(3), 426-437. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0483-1
  • Mejia, A., Filus, A., Calam, R., Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2016). Validation of the Spanish version of the CAPES: A brief instrument for assessing child psychological difficulties and parental self-efficacy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(4), 359-372. doi: 10.1177/0165025415591229
  • Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2001) Factor analysis and latent structure: confirmatory factor analysis. En N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 5239-5244). Oxford: Pergamon. doi: 10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00426-5
  • Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157.
  • Novo, M., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Vázquez, M. J., & Arce, R. (2019). Assessing the effects of a parental separation education program on mental health problems. Psicothema, 31(3), 284-291. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.299
  • Osborne, J. (2008). Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781412995627
  • Perez-Gramaje, A. F., García, O. F., Reyes, M., Serra, E., & García, F. (2020). Parenting styles and aggressive adolescents: Relationships with self-esteem and personal maladjustment. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 12(1), 1-10. doi: 10.5093/ejpalc2020a1
  • Ramos, P., Vázquez, N., Pasarín, M. I., & Artazcoz, L. (2016). Evaluación de un programa piloto promotor de habilidades parentales desde una perspectiva de salud pública. Gaceta Sanitaria, 30(1), 37-42. doi: 10.1016/j. gaceta.2015.08.008
  • Redondo, L., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Novo, M., & Arce, R. (2019). A meta-analytical review of the responses in the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF clinical and restructured scales of parents in child custody dispute. Anales de Psicología, 35(1) 156-165. doi: 10.6018/analesps.35.1.338381
  • Rodrigo, M.J., Martín, J. C., Cabrera, E., & Máiquez, M. (2009). Las competencias parentales en contextos de riesgo psicosocial. Psychosocial Intervention, 18(2) 113-120. doi: 10.5093/in2009v18n2a3
  • Rosanbalm, K. D., Snyder, E. H., Lawrence, C. N., Coleman, K., Frey, J. J., van den Ende, J. B., & Dodge, K. A. (2016). Child wellbeing assessment in child welfare: A review of four measures. Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.06.023
  • Salvador, B., Arce, R., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., & Seijo, D. (2017). Evaluación psicométrica de la psicopatía: una revisión metaanalítica. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 49(1), 36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.rlp.2015.09.015
  • Sanders, M. R., Morawska, A., Haslam, D. M., Filus, A., & Fletcher, R. (2014). Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): validation of a brief parent-report measure for use in assessment of parenting skills and family relationships. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 45(3), 255-272. doi: 10.1007/s10578-013-0397-3
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Seijo, D., Fariña, F., Corrás, T., Novo, M., & Arce, R. (2016). Estimating the epidemiology and quantifying the damages of parental separation in children and adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1611. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2016.01611
  • Seward, R. J., Bayliss, D. M., & Ohan, J. L. (2018). The Children’s Social Vulnerability Questionnaire (CSVQ): Validation, relationship with psychosocial functioning, and age-related differences. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18(2), 179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.02.001
  • Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
  • Valiente, R. M., Magaz, A., Chorot, P., & Sandín, B. (2016). Estructura factorial del cuestionario de percepción de estilos de crianza CRPBI-Abreviado. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 3(2), 69-78.
  • Vázquez., F. L., Otero, P., López, L., Blanco, V., Ferraces, M. J., & Torres, Á. (2019). Cuestionario de Personalidad de Eysenck Revisado-Abreviado para cuidadores informales. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 10(2), 90-106. doi: 10.23923/j.rips.2019.02.028
  • Vermeer, H. J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Cárcamo, R. A., & Harrison, L. J. (2016). Quality of child care using the environment rating scales: A meta-analysis of international studies. International Journal of Early Childhood, 48(1), 33-60. doi: 10.1007/s13158-015-0154-9