Notas para o estudio da hipótese de explicitación

  1. Alberto Álvarez Lugrís 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Journal:
Viceversa: revista galega de traducción

ISSN: 1135-8920,  1989-2853

Year of publication: 2001

Issue: 7-8

Pages: 131-148

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Viceversa: revista galega de traducción

Abstract

The explicitation hypothesis postulates an observed cohesive explicit-ness from SL to TL te xts regardless of the increase traceable to differences between the two linguistic and textual systems involved (Blum-Kulka, 1986; Baker, 1896). Nevertheless, both the analysis of the bilingual English-Galician corpus TECTRA and the data from other adjacent disciplines such as Contrastive Rethorics or Textual Linguistics seem to indicate that explici-tation is not a constant factor in ali translations and, moreover, that it is not exclusive to this kind of process. lt is necessary, therefore, to reformulate the definition of explicitation and regard it as a mere tendency of ali communica-tion process. Blum-Kulka herself acknowledges that there are instances of explicitation that are due to the different stylistic preferences of languages, which means that \arge-scale empírica! studies are needed to validate either or both the stylistic preference and the explicitation.

Bibliographic References

  • ÁLVAREZ LUGRÍS, A. 1998. "Notas para a definición dunha Estilística comparada da traducción". Viceversa. Revista galega de traducción. Vol. 4, pp. 25-40.
  • ÁLVAREZ LUGRÍS, A. 1999. A traducción do inglés ó galega. Proposta de Estilística Comparada. Tese de doutoramento. Universidade de Vigo.
  • ÁLVAREZ LUGRÍS, A. 2001. Estilística comparada da traducción. Proposta metodolóxica e aplicación práctica ó estudio do corpus TECTRA de traduccións do inglés ó galego. Vigo: Servicio de Publicacións da Universidade de Vigo.
  • BAKER, M. 1993. "Corpus Linguistics and Translation Studies. Implications and Applications". En BAKER, FRANCIS, TOGNINI-BONELLI, (eds.) Text and Technology. In honour John Sinclair. Filadelfia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1993, pp. 233-250.
  • BALLARD, M. 1987. La traduction de l'anglais aufran<;ais. 2° edición, 1996. París: Éditions Nathan.
  • BEAUGRANDE, R. de & DRESSLER, W. U. 1981. Introduction to Text linguistics. Longman Linguistics Library nº 26. Londres/Nova York: Longman.
  • BLUM-KULKA, S. 1986. "Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation". En HOUSE, & BLUM-KULKA (eds.) Jnterlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübinger Beitrage zur Linguistik. Túbinga: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1986, pp. 17-35.
  • CAMPBELL, K. S. 1995. Coherence, continuity, and cohesion. Theoretical Foundations for Document Design. LEA's Communication Series. Hillsdale (Nova Jersey)/Hove (Inglaterra): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • CLYNE, M. 1981. "Culture and Discourse Structure". En Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 5, pp. 61-66.
  • ENGLUND DIMITROVA, B.1997 "Omissions in consecutive interpretation: evidence of a decision component". En Professor Anders Sjoberg in memoriam. Estocolmo: lnstitute for Slavonic and Baltic Languages, Stockholm University.
  • FERNÁNDEZ POLO, F. J. 1997. Aspectos discursivos en la traducción de textos científicos del inglés al español. Tese de doutoramento, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
  • GRICE, P. 1975. "Logic and conversation". En COLE & MORGAN (eds.) Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts. Nova York: Academic, 1975, pp. 41-58.
  • HATIM, B. & MASON, l. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. Language in Social Life Series. Londres/Nova York: Longman.
  • HERNÁNDEZ SACRISTÁN, C. 1994. Aspects of linguistic Contrast and Translation: the Natural Perspective. European University Studies Series 21, Linguistik, vol. 149. Frankfmt do Main/Berlín/Berna/Nova York/París/ Viena: Peter Lang.
  • HOOF, van H. 1989. Traduire l 'anglais. Théorie et pratique. Segunda reimpresión, 1994. Gembloux: Duculot.
  • KAPLAN, R. 1996. "Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education" . En Language Learning. Vol 16, pp. 1-20.
  • KLAUDY, K.1993. "On Explicitation Hypothesis". In KLAUDY, KOHN, MOLNÁR & SZALAI (eds.) Transferre Necesse Est ... Current Jssues of Translation Theory. In Honour of Gyorgy Radó. Szombathely: BDTF. Acta Germanistica Savariensia. Wissenschaftliche Beitrage des Lehrstuhls für Deutsche Sprache und Literatur der Padagogischen Hochschule Berzsenyi Dániel, 1993, pp. 69-77.
  • KLAUDY, K. 1996. "Back-Translation as a Tool for Detecting Explicitation Strategies in Translation". En KLAUDY, LAMBERT & SOHÁR (eds.) Translation Studies in Hungary. Budapest: Scholastica Kiadó, 1996, pp. 99-114.
  • KLAUDY, K. 1998. "Explicitation". En BAKER (ed.) . Routledge Encyclopedia al Translation Studies. Londres/Nova York: Routledge, 1998, pp. 80-84.
  • KOHN, J. 1996. "What Can (Corpus) Linguistics Do for Translation?" En KLAUDY, LAMBERT & SOHÁR (eds.) Translation Studies in Hungary. Budapest: Scholastica Kiadó, 1996, pp. 39-52.
  • MAURANEN, A. 1993. "Contrastive ESP Rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economics Texts". En Englishfor Specific Purposes. Vol. 12, pp. 3-32.
  • MOTT, B. 1993. A Course in Semantics and Translation far Spanish Learners of English. Colección LCT (Letras, Ciencias, Técnicas), vol. 67. Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias (PPU).
  • NIDA, E. 1964. Towards a Science of Translating, with Special Reference to Principies and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  • NIDA, E. & TABER, C. R . 1969. The Theory and Practice ofTranslating. Helps for Translators, vol. VIII. Segunda reimpresión fotomecánica, 1982. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  • ROBINSON, D. 1991. The Translator 's Turn. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
  • SCHJOLDAGER, A. 1996. "An Exploratory Study of Translational Norms in Simultaneous Interpreting: Methodological Reflections". Selected Papers ofthe CERA Research Seminars in Translation Studies 1992-1993. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit, 1996, pp. 96-119.
  • SÉGUINOT, C. 1991. "A Study of Student Translation Strategies". En TIRKKONEN-CONDIT (ed.) Empírical Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies. Selected Papers of the TRANSJF Seminar, Savonlinna, 1988. Language in Performance, nº 5. Túbinga: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1991, pp. 79-88.
  • STOCKWELL, R. P., BROWN, J. D. & MARTIN, J. W. 1965. The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish. An Analysis of Structural D!fferences between the two Languages. Contrastive Studies Series. Séptima reimpresión, 1973. Chicago/Londres: The University of Chicago Pres s.
  • TIRKKONEN- CONDIT, S. 1986. "Text-type Markers and Translation Equivalence". En HOUSE & BLUM-KULKA (eds.) Interlingual and Intercultura/ Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Ti.ibinger Beitrage zur Linguistik. Túbinga: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1986, pp. 95-114.
  • TOURY, G. 1991. "Experimentation in Translation Studies: Achievernents, Prospects and Sorne Pitfalls" . En TIRKKONEN- CONDIT, (ed.) Empírica! Research in Translation and Intercultural Studies. Selected Papers ofthe TRANSIF Seminar Savonlinna, 1988. Language in Performance, nº 5. Túbinga: Gunter Narr Yerlag, 1991, pp. 45-66.
  • TOURY, G. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Benjarnins Translation Library, vol. 4. Amsterdam/ Filadelfia: John Benjarnins Publishing Company.
  • VÁZQUEZ AYORA, G. 1977. Introducción a la traductología. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  • VINAY, J. P. & DARBELNET, J. 1958. Stylistique comparée du français et de l'anglais. Méthode de traduction. Bibliotheque de Stylistique Comparée, nº 1. Nova edición revisada e corrixida, 1994. París: Les Éditions Didier.
Data source: Dialnet