Fact-checkers on social networksanalysis of their presence and content distribution channels

  1. Alberto Dafonte-Gómez 1
  2. María-Isabel Míguez-González 1
  3. Diana Ramahí-García 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Journal:
Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

ISSN: 2386-7876

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 35

Issue: 3

Pages: 73-89

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15581/003.35.3.73-89 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

Related Projects

NARRATIVAS DIGITALES CONTRA LA DESINFORMACIÓN. ESTUDIO DE REDES, TEMAS Y FORMATOS EN LOS FACTCHECKERS IBEROAMERICANOS

109779

Abstract

Fact-checking is a thriving journalistic discipline that, in recent years, has gained great prominence as a tool in combating disinformation. The effectiveness of the work carried out by these journalistic initiatives depends not only on the quality of their content, but also on their ability to reach large audiences through the same channels by which disinformation spreads. In this context, we consider it important to know to what extent fact-checkers use social networks and other types of digital channels in order to deliver their fact-checks to a wide audience, whether there are differences between the practices developed by these actors according to the type of organisation to which they belong and whether there is a distinguishing element in this regard for Ibero-American fact-checkers. This article focuses on analysing the presence on social networks and the use of content distribution tools by 104 fact-checkers from all over the world pertaining to the International Fact-Checking Network in 2020. The results show significant differences in terms of network presence based on the type of entity to which fact-checkers belong, the independent fact-checkers being the ones using a wider variety of distribution channels. It has also been confirmed that Ibero-American fact-checkers have a greater presence on social networks, use more digital tools and provide more channels to share their content than the rest of the international sample.

Bibliographic References

  • Amorós, M. (2018). Fake News. La verdad de las noticias falsas. Barcelona: Plataforma Editorial.
  • Andı, S. (2021). How and Why do Consumers Access News on Social Media? In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Schultz, S. Andı, C. T. Robertson & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
  • Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Delponti, P. & Rodríguez-Wangüemert, C. (2020). Intentional or inadvertent fake news sharing? Fact-checking warnings and users’ interaction with social media content. El profesional de la información (EPI), 29(5). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.07
  • Barrera, O., Guriev, S., Henry, E. & Zhuravskaya, E. (2020). Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Journal of Public Economics, 182. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104123
  • Bechmann, A. (2020). Tackling Disinformation and Infodemics Demands Media Policy Changes. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 855-863. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1773887
  • Bradshaw, S., Bailey, H. & Howard, P. N. (2021). Industralized Disinformation: 2020 Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation. (Project on Computational Propaganda). Oxford Internet Institute.
  • Brandtzaeg, P. B., Følstad, A. & Chaparro Domínguez, M. Á. (2018). How Journalists and Social Media Users Perceive Online Fact-Checking and Verification Services. Journalism Practice, 12(9), 1109-1129. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1363657
  • Brennen, J. S., Simon, F., Howard, P. N. & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation
  • Buchanan, T. (2020). Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation. PLoS ONE, 15(10 October). https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239666
  • Calvo, E. & Aruguete, N. (2021). Chequeado en Argentina. Fact checking y la propagación de noticias falsas en las redes sociales. Chequeado and University of Maryland. Retrieved from https://chequeado.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Chequeado-en-Argentina.-Fact-checking-y-la-propagacion-de-noticias-falsas-en-redes-sociales.pdf
  • Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the Audience Turn in Journalism: From Quality Discourse to Innovation Discourse as Anchoring Practices 1995-2020. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326-2342. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1847681
  • Cueva Chacón, L. M. & Saldaña, M. (2021). Stronger and Safer Together: Motivations for and Challenges of (Trans)National Collaboration in Investigative Reporting in Latin America. Digital Journalism, 9(2), 196-214. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1775103
  • Dafonte-Gómez, A., Corbacho-Valencia, J. M. & García-Mirón, S. (2021). El fact-checking en Iberoamérica: evolución reciente y mapa de situación. In J. Sotelo González & J. González García (Eds.), Digital Media. El papel de las redes sociales en el ecosistema educomunicativo en tiempo de COVID-19 (pp. 877-889). Madrid: McGraw-Hill. https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14185283
  • Dafonte-Gómez, A., Míguez-González, M.-I. & Martínez-Rolán, X. (2022). Los fact-checkers iberoamericanos frente a la COVID-19. Análisis de actividad en Facebook. Observatorio (OBS*), 16(1), 160-182. https://www.doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS16120221823
  • Díaz-Campo, J., Segado-Boj, F. & Fernández-Gómez, E. (2021). Hábitos del usuario y tipo de red social como predictores de consumo y difusión de noticias. Profesional de la Información, 30(4). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.17
  • Ecker, U. K. H., Butler, L. H. & Hamby, A. (2020). You don’t have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00266-x
  • Edgerly, S., Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E. & Tham, S. M. (2020). When Do Audiences Verify? How Perceptions About Message and Source Influence Audience Verification of News Headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 52-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077699019864680
  • Elizabeth, J. (2014, May 20). Who are you calling a fact checker? American Press Institute. Retrieved from https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/fact-checking-project/fact-checker-definition/
  • European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the High-Level Group on fake news and online disinformation. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=50271
  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Graves, L. (2016). Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Graves, L. & Cherubini, F. (2016). The Rise of Fact-Checking Sites in Europe. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/rise-fact-checking-sites-europe
  • Guallar, J., Codina, L., Freixa, P. & Pérez-Montoro, M. (2020). Desinformación, bulos, curación y verificación. Revisión de estudios en Iberoamérica 2017-2020. Telos: revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 22(3), 595-613. https://www.doi.org/10.36390/telos223.09
  • Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 472-480. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x
  • Haigh, M., Haigh, T. & Kozak, N. I. (2018). Stopping Fake News: The work practices of peer-to-peer counter propaganda. Journalism Studies, 19(14), 2062-2087. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1316681
  • Hameleers, M. (2019). Susceptibility to mis- and disinformation and the effectiveness of fact-checkers: Can misinformation be effectively combated? SCM Studies in Communication and Media, 8(4), 523-546. https://www.doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-4-523
  • Humprecht, E. (2020). How Do They Debunk “Fake News”? A Cross-National Comparison of Transparency in Fact Checks. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 310-327. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1691031
  • Kuklinski, J. H. & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins & S. L. E. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality (pp. 153-182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805813.008
  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N. & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
  • Margolin, D. B., Hannak, A. & Weber, I. (2018). Political Fact-Checking on Twitter: When Do Corrections Have an Effect? Political Communication, 35(2), 196-219. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334018
  • Mena, P. (2020). Cleaning Up Social Media: The Effect of Warning Labels on Likelihood of Sharing False News on Facebook. Policy and Internet, 12(2), 165-183. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/poi3.214
  • Mesquita, L. & de-Lima-Santos, M.-F. (2021). Collaborative Journalism from a Latin American Perspective: An Empirical Analysis. Journalism and Media, 2(4), 545-571. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2040033
  • Mioli, T. & Nafría, I. (2017). Periodismo innovador en América Latina. Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas at the University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://journalismcourses.org/ebook/innovative-journalism-in-latin-america/
  • Mioli, T. & Nafría, I. (2018). Innovadores en el periodismo latinoamericano. Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas at the University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://journalismcourses.org/ebook/innovators-in-latin-american-journalism/
  • Mitchelstein, E. & Boczkowski, P. J. (2021). What a Special Issue on Latin America Teaches Us about Some Key Limitations in the Field of Digital Journalism. Digital Journalism, 9(2), 130-135. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1873813
  • Molina-Cañabate, J. P. & Magallón-Rosa, R. (2021). Desinformación y fact-checking en las elecciones uruguayas de 2019. El caso de Verificado Uruguay. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 14(1), 89-112.
  • Moreno-Espinosa, P. & Román-San-Miguel, A. (2021). Medios y comunicación en tiempos de posverdad. In R. Mancinas-Chávez & M. L. Cárdenas-Rica (Eds.), Las fake news en el periodismo audiovisual. El caso del podcasting y el vodcasting. Madrid: Fragua. Retrieved from https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/106475
  • Nekmat, E. (2020). Nudge Effect of Fact-Check Alerts: Source Influence and Media Skepticism on Sharing of News Misinformation in Social Media. Social Media and Society, 6(1). https://www.doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897322
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalegeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L. & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital-News-Report-2016.pdf
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A. & Nielsen, R. K. (2019). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-06/DNR_2019_FINAL_1.pdf
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D. A. L., Nielsen, R. K. & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from http://media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schultz, A., Andı, S. & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schultz, A., Andı, S., Robertson, C. T. & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf
  • Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J. & Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability. Political Behavior, 42(3), 939-960. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
  • Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2010). When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
  • Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2015). The Effect of Fact-Checking on Elites: A Field Experiment on U.S. State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 628-640. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12162
  • Ramahí-García, D., García-Crespo, O. & Dafonte-Gómez, A. (2021). Los formatos audiovisuales en la verificación de datos. Análisis de la actividad de los fact-checkers en YouTube (2009-2020). AdComunica, 22, 73-96. https://www.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2021.22.6
  • Robertson, C. T., Mourão, R. R. & Thorson, E. (2020). Who Uses Fact-Checking Sites? The Impact of Demographics, Political Antecedents, and Media Use on Fact-Checking Site Awareness, Attitudes, and Behavior. International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 217-237. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161219898055
  • Rodríguez-Virgili, J., Serrano-Puche, J. & Fernández, C. B. (2021). Digital Disinformation and Preventive Actions: Perceptions of Users from Argentina, Chile, and Spain. Media and Communication, 9(1), 323-337. https://www.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3521
  • Salaverría, R., Sádaba, C., Breiner, J. G. & Warner, J. C. (2019). A brave new digital journalism in Latin America. Communication: Innovation & Quality. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 154, 229-247. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91860-0_14
  • Schmitz Weiss, A., de Macedo Higgins Joyce, V., Harlow, S. & Alves, R. C. (2020). Defining Journalism Innovation in Latin America: Exploration into Perceptions among Educators, Students, and Journalists. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 75(4), 419-435. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077695820935327
  • Stencel, M. & Luther, J. (2021a, June 3). Fact-checking census shows slower growth. Duke Reporters’ Lab. Retrieved from https://reporterslab.org/annual-census-finds-nearly-300-fact-checking-projects-around-the-world/
  • Stencel, M. & Luther, J. (2021b, June 22). Annual census finds nearly 300 fact-checking projects around the world. Duke Reporters’ Lab. Retrieved from https://reporterslab.org/annual-census-finds-nearly-300-fact-checking-projects-around-the-world/
  • Tandoc, E. C., Jr, Lim, D. & Ling, R. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381-398. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325
  • The Long Fuse: Misinformation and the 2020 Election (2021). Center for an Informed Public, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Graphika, & Stanford Internet Observatory; Stanford Digital Repository: Election Integrity Partnership. v1.2.0. Retrieved from https://purl.stanford.edu/tr171zs0069
  • Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., Katz, J. E. & Miranda, J. P. (2019). The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation: Social Media, Political Engagement, and the Spread of Misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 1-22 . https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623701
  • Vázquez-Herrero, J., Vizoso, Á. & López-García, X. (2019). Innovación tecnológica y comunicativa para combatir la desinformación: 135 experiencias para un cambio de rumbo. El Profesional de la Información, 28(3). https://www.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.01
  • Vizoso, Á. & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2019). Fact-checking platforms in Spanish. Features, organisation and method. Communication & Society, 32(1), 127-143. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.127-143
  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  • Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L. & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-Checking: A Meta-Analysis of What Works and for Whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350-375. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
  • Wood, T. & Porter, E. (2019). The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135-163. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
  • Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S. & Goldring, A. (2018). Fact-Checking Effectiveness as a Function of Format and Tone: Evaluating FactCheck.org and FlackCheck.org. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 49-75. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1077699017710453
Data source: Dialnet