From disinformation to fact-checkingHow Ibero-American fact-checkers on Twitter combat fake news

  1. Míguez-González, María-Isabel 1
  2. Martínez-Rolán, Xabier 1
  3. García-Mirón, Silvia 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Journal:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: Transparency

Volume: 32

Issue: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2023.ENE.10 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: El profesional de la información

Related Projects

NARRATIVAS DIGITALES CONTRA LA DESINFORMACIÓN. ESTUDIO DE REDES, TEMAS Y FORMATOS EN LOS FACTCHECKERS IBEROAMERICANOS

109779

Abstract

In recent years, the disinformation phenomenon, brought about by the ease with which fake news and hoaxes spread on social networks, has grown considerably. Twitter, especially, is a network that from the outset has been closely linked to news processes that are widely used by journalists. It has become a highly efficient means of spreading disinformation owing to its immediacy and capacity to spread contents. The microblogging network has attracted the attention of researchers and is a suitable subject matter for analysing how fact-checkers communicate as agents who nurture digital literacy in the general public to help them spot disinformation. The aim of this research is to characterise the use of Twitter by Ibero-American fact-checkers and to determine to what extent their posting habits influence interaction. To do so, the trending and timing for posts, the type of contents and resources used by each fact-checker and the interactions created on all levels are analysed. This research stated that Ibero-American fact-checkers throughout 2021 were highly active on Twitter. This was closely linked to the crises related to Covid-19. Communications from these organisations have helped to spread and reinforce their fact-checking and digital literacy mission, even though their performance is no more efficient in terms of the scope and impact of their work. The results show that boosting posts of reactive tweets, adjusting posting time to the Twitter dynamics and increasing the use of resources such as images and mentions are useful strategies for promoting interaction.

Bibliographic References

  • AFP Checamos (2021). “Esta foto mostra a praia de Copacabana em manifestação a favor do presidente Bolsonaro em 7 de setembro de 2021?”. Twitter, [@AfpChecamos], 7 septiembre. https://twitter.com/AfpChecamos/status/1435318667856650241
  • Aos Fatos (2021). “URGENTE. O presidente @jairbolsonaro bloqueou em sua conta oficial este perfil do Aos Fatos no Twitter”. Twitter, [@aosfatos], 18 enero. https://twitter.com/aosfatos/status/1351188897678712835
  • Ardèvol-Abreu, Alberto; Delponti, Patricia; Rodríguez-Wangüemert, Carmen (2020). “Intentional or inadvertent fake news sharing? Fact-checking warnings and users’ interaction with social media content”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 5, e290507. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.07
  • Bernal-Triviño, Ana; Clares-Gavilán, Judith (2019). “Uso del móvil y las redes sociales como canales de verificación de fake news. El caso de Maldita.es”. Profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 3, e280312. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.12
  • Blanco-Alfonso, Ignacio; Chaparro-Domínguez, María-Ángeles; Repiso, Rafael (2021). “El fact-checking como estrategia global para contener la desinformación”. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, v. 27, n. 3, pp. 779-791. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.76189
  • Boyd, Danah; Golder, Scott; Lotan, Gilad (2010). “Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter”. In: 2010 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
  • Brandtzaeg, Peter-Bae; Lüders, Marika; Spangenberg, Jochen; Rath-Wiggins, Linda; Følstad, Asbjørn (2016). “Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media”. Journalism practice, v. 10, n. 3, pp. 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1020331
  • Carrera-Álvarez, Pilar; Sainz-de-Baranda-Andújar, Clara; Herrero-Curiel, Eva; Limón-Serrano, Nieves (2012). “Periodismo y social media: cómo están usando Twitter los periodistas españoles”. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 31-53. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2012.v18.n1.39353
  • Ceron, Wilson; De-Lima-Santos, Mathias-Felipe; Quiles, Marcos G. (2021). “Fake news agenda in the era of Covid-19: Identifying trends through fact-checking content”. Online social networks and media, v. 21, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100116
  • Chung, Myojung; Kim, Nuri (2021). “When I learn the news is false: How fact-checking information stems the spread of fake news via third-person perception”. Human communication research, v. 47, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa010
  • Civila, Sabina; Romero-Rodríguez, Luis-Miguel; Aguaded, Ignacio (2020). “Competencia mediática contra el odio, la violencia discursiva y la confrontación: Análisis documental y de teoría fundamentada”. Temas de comunicación, v. 41. https://revistasenlinea.saber.ucab.edu.ve/index.php/temas/article/view/4751
  • Coddington, Mark; Molyneux, Logan; Lawrence, Regina G. (2014). “Fact checking the campaign: How political reporters use Twitter to set the record straight (or not)”. The international journal of press/politics, v. 19, n. 4, pp. 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161214540942
  • Comarela, Giovanni; Crovella, Mark; Almeida, Virgilio; Benevenuto, Fabricio (2012). “Understanding factors that affect response rates in Twitter”. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM conference on Hypertext and social media, p. 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2309996.2310017
  • Conde-Vázquez, Erika; Fontenla-Pedreira, Julia; Pereira-López, María (2020). “Fake news y fact-checking en la cobertura mediática durante la crisis del Covid-19 en España: El caso de Newtral y Maldito Bulo”. Revista ibérica de sistemas e tecnologias de informação, n. E35, pp. 559-571. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/fake-news-y-fact-checking-en-la-cobertura/docview/2453792143/se-2
  • Cooper, Belle-Beth (2018) “How Twitter’s Expanded images increase clicks, retweets and favorites [new data]”. Buffer blog, November 13. https://buffer.com/resources/the-power-of-twitters-new-expanded-images-and-how-to-make-the-most-of-it
  • Dafonte-Gómez, Alberto; Baamonde-Silva, Xosé-Manuel (2020). “Maldito bulo: Análisis de actividad e impacto en Telegram”. En: De-Vicente-Domínguez, Aída-María; Sierra-Sánchez, Javier (coords.). Aproximación periodística y educomunicativa al fenómeno de las redes sociales. España: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España, pp. 1019-1037. ISBN: 978 84 486 2035 6
  • Dafonte-Gómez, Alberto; Míguez-González, María-Isabel; Ramahí-García, Diana (2022). “Fact-checkers on social networks: analysis of their presence and content distribution channels”. Communication & society, v. 35, n. 3, pp. 73-89. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.3.73-89
  • Del-Fresno-García, Miguel (2019). “Desórdenes informativos: Sobreexpuestos e infrainformados en la era de la posverdad”. Profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 3, e200302. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.may.02
  • Díaz-Soloaga, Carmen (2018). “Calcular el engagement en Twitter, cómo mejorarlo”. Socialmediapymes, 27 febrero. https://www.socialmediapymes.com/calcular-el-engagement-en-twitter
  • Enge, Eric (2014). “Twitter engagement unmasked: A study of more than 4M tweets”. Perficient, December 11. https://blogs.perficient.com/2014/12/11/twitter-engagement-umasked
  • European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the High-Level Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation. http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=50271
  • Fast Check CL (2021). “Todos los puntos que menciona el candidato Gabriel Boric fueron encontrados en el programa del candidato José Antonio Kast”. Twitter, [@fastcheckcl], 16 noviembre. https://twitter.com/fastcheckcl/status/1460451640306286599
  • Fernández-Gómez, Erika; Martín-Quevedo, Juan (2018). “La estrategia de engagement de Netflix España en Twitter”. Profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 6, pp. 1292-1302. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.12
  • Gamir-Ríos, José; Pop, Anastasia-Ioana; López-Garcia, Guillermo; Llorca-Abad, Germán; Fenoll, Vicente (2022). “Unidireccionalidad, promoción partidista y polarización. Actividad en Twitter de los candidatos a la presidencia del Gobierno de España en las elecciones generales de 2019”. Profesional de la información, v. 31, n. 2. e310203. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.03
  • García-Vivero, Gloria; López-García, Xosé (2021). “La verificación de datos en Europa. Análisis de 5 iniciativas europeas: Maldita.es, Newtral, Pagella Politica, Les Décodeurs y BBC Reality Check”. AdComunica, v. 21, pp. 235-264. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2021.21.12
  • Guallar, Javier; Codina, Lluís; Freixa, Pere; Pérez-Montoro, Mario (2020). “Desinformación, bulos, curación y verificación. Revisión de estudios en Iberoamérica 2017-2020”. Telos: revista de estudios interdisciplinarios en ciencias sociales, v. 22, n. 3, pp. 595-613. https://doi.org/10.36390/telos223.09
  • Gul, Sumeer; Mahajan, Iram; Tun-Nisa, Nahida; Ahmad-Shah, Tariq; Jan, Asifa; Ahmad, Suhail (2016). “Tweets speak louder than leaders and masses: An analysis of tweets about the Jammu and Kashmir elections 2014”. Online information review, v. 40 n. 7, pp. 900-912. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2015-0330
  • Hagey, Keach; Horwitz, Jeff (2021). “Facebook tried to make its platform a healthier place. It got angrier instead”. The Wall Street Journal, 15 September. https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-algorithm-change-zuckerberg-11631654215
  • Hameleers, Michael (2020). “Separating truth from lies: comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands”. Information, communication & society, v. 25, n. 1, pp. 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764603
  • Herrero, Esperanza; Herrera-Damas, Susana (2021). “El fact-checking hispanohablante: Competencias, dificultades y propuestas de mejora desde la perspectiva de sus profesionales”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 6, e300612. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.12
  • Humprecht, Edda (2019). “Where ‘fake news’ flourishes: A comparison across four Western democracies”. Information, communication & society, v. 22, n. 13, pp. 1973-1988. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1474241
  • Humprecht, Edda (2020). “How do they debunk ‘fake news’? A cross-national comparison of transparency in fact checks”. Digital journalism, v. 8, n. 3, pp. 310-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1691031
  • Jiang, Shan; Wilson, Christo (2018). “Linguistic signals under misinformation and fact-checking: Evidence from user comments on social media”. In: Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction (CSCW). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3274351
  • Keutelian, Mary (2022). “The best times to post on social media in 2022”. Sprout social, 29 July. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/best-times-to-post-on-social-media/#twitter-times
  • Lahuerta-Otero, Eva; Cordero-Gutiérrez, Rebeca (2016). “Looking for the perfect tweet: The use of data mining techniques to find influencers on Twitter”. Computers in human behavior, v. 64, pp. 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.035
  • Lahuerta-Otero, Eva; Cordero-Gutiérrez, Rebeca; De-la-Prieta-Pintado, Fernando (2018). “Retweet or like? That is the question”. Online information review, v. 42, n. 5, pp. 562-578. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2017-0135
  • Lee, Jiyoung; Kim, Ji-Won; Lee, Hee-Yun (2022). “Unlocking conspiracy belief systems: How fact-checking label on Twitter counters conspiratorial MMR vaccine misinformation”. Health communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2031452
  • Lotero-Echeverri, Gabriel; Romero-Rodríguez, Luis-Miguel; Pérez-Rodríguez, Amor (2018). “Fact-checking vs. fake news: Periodismo de confirmación como recurso de la competencia mediática contra la desinformación”. Index.comunicación, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 295-316. https://indexcomunicacion.es/index.php/indexcomunicacion/article/view/370
  • Magallón-Rosa, Raúl (2018). “Nuevos formatos de verificación. El caso de Maldito Bulo en Twitter”. Sphera publica, v. 1, n. 18, pp. 41-65. https://sphera.ucam.edu/index.php/sphera-01/article/view/341
  • Magallón Rosa, Raúl (2019). “Verificado México 2018: desinformación y fact-checking en campaña electoral”. Revista de comunicación, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 234-258. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC18.1-2019-A12
  • Margolin, Drew B.; Hannak, Aniko; Weber, Ingmar (2018). “Political fact-checking on Twitter: when do corrections have an effect?”. Political communication, v. 35, n. 2, pp. 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334018
  • Morejón-Llamas, Noemí; Martín-Ramallal, Pablo; Micaletto-Belda, Juan-Pablo (2022). “Twitter content curation as an antidote to hybrid warfare during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine”. Profesional de la información, v. 31, n. 3, e310308. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.08
  • Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Schulz, Anne; Simge, Andı; Nielsen, Rasmus-Kleis (2020). Reuters Institute. Digital news report 2020. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020
  • Peeters, Stijn; Hagen, Sal (2022). “The 4CAT capture and analysis toolkit: a modular tool for transparent and traceable social media research”. Computational communication research, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 571-589. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914892
  • Pérez-Curiel, Concha; Velasco-Molpeceres, Ana-María (2020). “Trend and fact-checking narratives on Twitter. Verification codes and fake news in the Procés riots (14-O)”. adComunica, v. 20, pp. 95-122. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2020.20.5
  • Portugal, Rigliana; Aguaded, Ignacio (2020). “Competencias mediáticas y digitales, frente a la desinformación e infoxicación”. Razón y palabra, v. 24, n. 108. https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v24i108.1658
  • Poynter (2022). International Fact-checking Network’s code of principles. https://ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org
  • Ramon-Vegas, Xavier; Mauri-Ríos, Marcel; Rodríguez-Martínez, Ruth (2020). “Redes sociales y plataformas de fact-checking contra la desinformación sobre la Covid-19”. Hipertext.net, v. 21, pp. 79-92. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2020.i21.07
  • Salaverría, Ramón; Buslón, Nataly; López-Pan, Fernando; León, Bienvenido; López-Goñi, Ignacio; Erviti, María-Carmen (2020). “Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: Tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19”. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 3, e290315. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.15
  • Singer, Jane B. (2019). “Fact-checkers as entrepreneurs”. Journalism practice, v. 12, n. 8, pp. 976-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1493946
  • Skaff, Eugenia (s.f.). “Marketing en redes sociales: ¿Cuántas veces debes publicar por día para llegar a tu audiencia?”. Postcron. https://postcron.com/es/blog/marketing-en-redes-sociales-cuantas-veces-publicar-por-dia-en-cada-red-social
  • Toraman, Cagri; Şahinuç, Furkan; Yilmaz, Eyup-Halit; Akkaya, Ibrahim-Batuhan (2022). “Understanding social engagements: A comparative analysis of user and text features in Twitter”. Social network analysis and mining, v. 12, n. 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00872-1
  • Twitter (2019). “Twitter engagement report 2018”. Mention. https://mention.com/en/reports/twitter
  • Vargo, Chris J.; Guo, Lei; Amazeen, Michelle A. (2017) “The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016”. New media & society, v. 20, n. 5, pp. 2028-2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086
  • Vosoughi, Soroush; Roy, Deb; Aral, Sinan (2018). “The spread of true and false news online”. Science, v. 359, n. 6380, pp. 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  • We are social; Hootsuite (2021). Digital 2021: Global overview report. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2021/01/digital-2021-uk
  • Websa100 (2021), “¿Cuál es el ritmo de publicación ideal en cada red social?”. SEOptimer, 8 julio. https://www.seoptimer.com/es/blog/cual-es-el-ritmo-de-publicacion-ideal-en-cada-red-social
  • Xu, Zhiheng; Yang, Qing (2012). “Analyzing user retweet behavior on Twitter”. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, pp. 46-50. ISBN: 978 0 7695 4799 2 https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2012.18
  • Zhang, Jingwen; Featherstone, Jieyu-Ding; Calabrese, Christopher; Wojcieszak, Magdalena (2021). “Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines”. Preventive medicine, v. 145, 106408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106408
  • Zhang, Lun; Peng, Tai-Quan (2015). “Breadth, depth, and speed: diffusion of advertising messages on microblogging sites”. Internet research, v. 25 n. 3, pp. 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2014-0021
Data source: Dialnet