The role of text characteristics in the reading comprehension of primary school children in Spanish

  1. Carla Míguez-Álvarez 1
  2. Miguel Cuevas-Alonso 1
  3. Ángeles Saavedra 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Revista:
Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

ISSN: 2171-2069

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 13

Número: 1

Páginas: 41-55

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

Resumen

During the early grades of primary school, texts are mainly narrative and focus on technical aspects such as decoding words and understanding simple syntax. However, from 4th grade onwards, texts become increasingly more difficult and expository texts become the main source of knowledge from which children will have to extract and learn new information while creating their mental model. This article examined the influences of two main text characteristics: text genre and level of representation (text base and mental model), in the reading comprehension scores of 313 Spanish primary school children aged 8 to 11 to study the relationship between these variables as well as the differences between grades. Comprehension of each text genre was assessed through a validated multiple-choice questionnaire and each variable was compared through a series of correlational methods, such as Pearson’s correlation, Spearman’s rho and ANOVAs. The results showed that all grades obtained significant higher scores on the text base than the mental model but only the expository texts exhibited better results when passing from 4th to 5th and 6th grade. This study provides findings that may contribute to the topic of literacy education during primary school.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, B. C., Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. (1995). A trading relationship between reading skills and domain knowledge in children’s text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 307–323. https://doi. org/10.1080/01638539509544943
  • Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M., & HaefeleKalvaitis, J. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 216–241. https://doi.org/10.1006/ jecp.1996.0015
  • Bråten, I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2011). Does naturally occurring comprehension strategies instruction make a difference when students read expository text? Journal of Research in Reading, 36(1), 42–57. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01489.x
  • Best, R., Ozuru, Y., Floyd, R., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. https://doi. org/10.1080/02702710801963951
  • Betjemann, R. S., Keenan, K., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2011). Choice of reading comprehension test influences the outcomes of genetic analyses. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10888438.2010.493965
  • Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children’s inference generation: what do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 189–201. https://doi. org/10.1348/000709904X22674
  • Brockmeier, J., & Olson, D. R. (2009). The Literacy Episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge book of literacy (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671– 681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.96.4.671
  • Castillo, A. V., & Jiménez, G. (2016). ¿Es adecuado el enfoque de los libros de texto para el desarrollo de la comprensión lectora?: Análisis crítico de materiales de Educación Primaria [Is it appropriate the approach of textbook for the development of reading comprehension?: Critical analysis of primary Education materials]. Opción, 32, 437–454. Retrieved from https://www. redalyc.org/pdf/310/31048480024.pdf
  • Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. https:// doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
  • Coté, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ her/12.3.385
  • Cueto, N. (2002). Representación e inferencia. El proceso de la interpretación. Oviedo, Spain: Department of Spanish Philology, University of Oviedo.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2014). PROLEC-R. Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores, Revisada. Madrid, Spain: TEA Ediciones.
  • Cunha, V. L., & Capellini, S. A. (2017). Informative intervention programs to reading comprehension: Development and implementation. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 34(3), 411–422. https://doi. org/10.1590/1982-02752017000300009
  • Currie, N. K., & Cain, K. (2015). Children’s inference generation: The role of vocabulary and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57–75. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.005
  • De Mier, M. V., Borzone, A. M., Sánchez Abchi, V. S., & Benítez, M. E. (2013). Habilidades de comprensión y factores textuales en los primeros grados. Revista Peruana de Psicología y Trabajo Social, 2(1), 89–106. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/52476603.pdf
  • Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202– 224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1
  • Duke, N. K. (2003). Reading to learn from the very beginning: Information books in early childhood. Young Children, 58(2), 14–20.
  • Eloranta, A., Närhi, V., Ahonen, T., & Tuija, A. (2019). Does childhood reading disability or its continuance into adulthood underlie problems in adult-age psychosocial wellbeing? A follow-up study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(4), 273–286. https://doi.org /10.1080/10888438.2018.1561698.
  • Florit, E., Roch, M., & Levorato, C. (2011). Listening text comprehension of explicit and implicit information in preschoolers: The role of verbal and inferential skills. Discourse Processes, 48(2), 119–138. https://doi. org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.494244
  • Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies. Theories, interventions and technologies (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hall, K. M., Sabey, B. L., & McClellan, M. (2007). Expository text comprehension: Helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology, 26(3), 211–234. https://doi. org/10.1080/02702710590962550
  • Hua, A. N., & Keenan, J. M. (2017). Interpreting reading comprehension text results: Quantile regression shows that explanatory factors can vary with performance level. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 225–238. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.12806 75
  • Jeong, H. (2017). Narrative and expository genre effects on students, raters and performance criteria. Assessing Writing, 31, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. asw.2016.08.006
  • Kamberelis, G., & Bovino, T. D. (1999). Cultural artifacts as scaffolds for genre development. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(2), 138– 170. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.2.2
  • Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension texts vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence of decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300. https://doi. org/10.1080/10888430802132279
  • Kintsch, K. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A ConstructionIntegration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166- 4115(08)61551-4
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • León, J. A., Escudero Domínguez, I., & Olmos Albacete, R. (2012). ECOMPLEC. Evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Madrid, Spain: TEA.
  • León, J. A., Escudero, I., & van den Broek, P. (2013). La influencia del género del texto en el establecimiento de inferencias. In J. A. León (Ed.), Conocimiento y discurso: Claves para inferir y comprender (pp. 153–170). Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.
  • León, J. A., Martínez-Huertas, J. A., Olmos, R., Moreno, J. D., & Escudero, I. (2019). Metacomprehension skills depend on the type of texts: An analysis from Differential Item Functioning. Psicothema, 31(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2018.163
  • Liebfreund, M. D., & Conradi, K. (2016). Component skills affecting elementary students’ informational text comprehension. Reading and Writing, 29, 1141–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016- 9629-9
  • Lonigan, C. J. (2007). Development, assessment, and promotion of preliteracy skills. Education and Development, 17(1), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15566935eed1701_5
  • Lonigan, C. J., & Burgess, S. R. (2017). Dimensionality of reading skills with elementary school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 239–253. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.12859 18
  • Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Kremer, K., Kendeou, P., White, M. J., & Lorch, E. P. (2008). The development of narrative comprehension and its relation to other early reading skills. Reading Psychology, 29(4), 327–365. https://doi. org/10.1080/02702710802165416
  • McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 229–258. Retrieved from https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/ article/view/222/218
  • Meyer, B. J., & Ray, M. N. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 127–152. Retrieved from https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/ article/view/217
  • Míguez, C., & Cuevas, M. (2021) Tipología textual y comprensión lectora en el alumnado de educación primaria. En D. Caldevilla (Ed.), Libro de Actas del X Congreso Universitario Internacional sobre Contenidos, Investigación, Innovación y Docencia (p. 763) Madrid, Spain: Fórum Internacional de Comunicación y Relaciones Públicas.
  • Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies. Theories, interventions and technologies (pp. 47–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ohtsuka, K. (1993, November 23). Text genres and mental models: What readers get from text and how they use it [Conference presentation abstract]. Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Annual Conference, Fremantle, Western Australia. Retrieved from https://www.aare.edu.au/ publications/aare-conference-papers/ show/879/text-genres-and-mental-modelswhat-readers-get-from-text-and-how-theyuse-it
  • Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. Z. (2015). Comprehending implicit meanings in text without making inferences. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 1–18). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ramírez, E. M. (2015). La lectura más allá de la letra en la formación de lectores. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 29, 7-14. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.02.023
  • Reed, D., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Retell as an indicator of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 187– 217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2 010.538780
  • Sandford, A., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Snow, C. E. (2003). Assessment of reading comprehension. Researchers and practitioners helping themselves and each other. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 192– 206). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
  • Tumner, W. E., & Bowey, J. A. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition. In W. E. Tumner, C. Pratt, & M. L. Herriman (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children. Theory, research and implications (pp. 144–168). Berlin, Germany: SpringerVerlag.
  • Vieiro Iglesias, P., & Gómez Veiga, I. (2004). Psicología de la lectura. Madrid, Spain: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., De Sisto, L. A., & deCani, J. S. (2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 538–550. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.538
  • Yildrim, K., Cetinkaya, F. C., Ates, S., Kaya, D., & Rasinski, T. (2020). Testing the KAPS model of reading comprehension in a Turkish elementary school context from low socioeconomic background. Education Sciences, 10(4), 90–100. https://doi. org/10.3390/educsci10040090