La progresiva ecologización del derecho internacional de los cursos de agua. Manifestaciones convencionales, jurisprudenciales y consuetudinarias

Referencias bibliográficas

• ARCARI, M., “Le droit interétatique de l’eau: les principes matériels de la convention de New York (21 Mai 1997)", en JEANCLOS, Y. (dir.), Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg. Les politiques de l'eau au XXIe siècle, Tome 2, Cirpes, Paris, 2002, pp. 17-32.
• AURIA Y LARIOS DE MEDRANO, A. M., La regulación internacional del agua dulce. Práctica española, Thomson Aranzadi, Navarra, 2008.
• BARSTOW MAGRAW, D. and UDOMRITTHIRUJ, P., “Water and Multilateral Environmental Agreements: An Incomplete Jigsaw Puzzle”, en MCCAFFREY, S. C. et al. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Water Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, pp. 166-185.
• BINDER, C. and A HOFBAUER, J. A., “The Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle or the Limits of Interpretation - The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Case Revisited”, en FORLATI, S. et al. (eds.), The Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Judgment and its Contribution to the Development of International Law, Brill, 2020, pp. 58- 77.
• BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, L., Fresh water in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• BORRÁS-PENTINAT, S. y SÁNCHEZ, M. M., “Los derechos de la naturaleza ¿el camino hacia la paz ecológica?, Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, Vol. XIII, nº 1, pp. 1-15.
• BOURNE, C., “The Primacy of the Principle of Equitable Utilization in the 1997 Watercourses Convention”, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 35, 1998, pp. 215-232.
• BOYLE, A. and HARRISON, J., “Judicial settlement of International Environmental Disputes: Current problems”, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 4, nº 2, 2013, pp. 245-270.
• BRELS, S., COATES, D., and LOURES, F., Transboundary water resources management: the role of international watercourse agreements in implementation of the CBD, CBD Technical Series nº 40, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 2008.
• CAFLISCH, L., “Regulation of the uses of international waterways: the contribution of the United Nations”, en GLASSNER, M. I., The United Nations at work, Praeguer Publishers, Westport CT, 1998.
• CAFLISH, L., “Prior notice and related uses”, en MCCAFFREY, S. C., et al. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Water Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, pp. 109-125.
• CERVELL HORTAL, M. J., “La CIJ y los ríos internacionales, un desencuentro que no debería ser definitivo”, en GUTIÉRREZ ESPADA, C., et al. (coords.), El agua como factor de cooperación y de conflicto en las relaciones internacionales contemporáneas, Instituto Euromediterráneo del Agua, Murcia, 2009, p. 173.
• CITTADINO, F., “Science novit curia? Damage evaluation methods and the role of experts in the Costa Rica v Nicaragua case”, Questions of International Law, Zoom-in 57, 2019, pp. 35-53.
• COULON, A., “The International Court of Justice and the protection of the environment”, en SOBENES, E. et al. (eds.), The Environment Through the Lens of International Courts and Tribunals, Springer, 2022, pp. 37-70. CULLINAN, C., “Earth Jurisprudence” en RAJAMANI, L., and PEEL, J., (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, 2021, 2nd ed., pp. 233-248.
• DE LUCIA, V., “A critical interrrogation of the relation between the ecosystem approach and ecosystem services”, Review of European, Comparative and Internacional Environmental Law, Vol. 27, Issue 8, 2018, pp. 104-114.
• DE LUCIA, V., The ‘Ecosystem approach’ in International Environmental Law. Genealogy and Biopolitics, Routledge, 2019.
• ECKSTEIN, G. et al., The Greening of Water Law. Managing Freshwater Resources for People and the Environment, United Nations Environmental Programme, Nairobi, 2010.
• ECKSTEIN, G., The International Law of Transboundary Groundwater Resources, Earthscan, 2017.
• FERNÁNDEZ EGEA, R. M., “La protección medioambiental en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia: ¿un reto irresoluble?”, en TORRECUADRADA GARCÍA-LOZANO, S. (dir.), Los nuevos retos de la Corte Internacional de Justica. Los desafíos de la Corte Internacional de Justicia y las sinergias entre la Corte y otros órganos jurisdiccionales, Wolters Kluwer, 2021, pp. 105-134.
• GARCÍA RICO, E., GARCÍA SAN JOSÉ, D., TORRES CAZORLA, M. I., “La práctica reciente de la Corte Internacional de Justicia en controversias jurídicas con un componente científico: un análisis crítico”, en VÁZQUEZ GÓMEZ, E. M. et al. (coords.), El arreglo pacífico de controversias internacionales, Tiran lo Blanch, Valencia, 2013, pp. 101-112.
• GILES-CARNERO, R., “La Corte Internacional de Justicia frente a las controversias internacionales de carácter medioambiental”, en VÁZQUEZ GÓMEZ, E. M., et al. (coords.), El arreglo pacífico de controversias internacionales, Tiran lo Blanch, Valencia, 2013, pp. 159-167.
• IGRAC, Transboundary Aquifers of the World [map]. Edition 2021. Scale 1: 50 000 000. Delft, Netherlands, 2021.
• JUSTE RUIZ, J., “The International Court of Justice and International Environmental Law”, en BOSCHIERO, N. et al. (eds.), International Courts and The Development of the Development of International Law: Essays in honour of Tullio Treves, Asser Press, La Haya, 2013, pp. 383-401.
• JUSTE RUIZ, J., BOU FRANCH, V., “El caso de las plantas de celulosa sobre el río Uruguay: Sentencia de la Corte Internacional de Justicia de 20 de abril 2010”, Revista Electrónica de Estudios internacionales, nº 21, 2011.
• KINDJI, K. and FAURE, M., “Assessing reparation of environmental damage by the ICJ: A lost opportunity?”, Questions of International Law, Zoom-in, 57, 2019, pp. 24-25.
• MBENGUE, M. M. and DAS, R., Use of Experts in International Freshwater Disputes. A Critical Assessment, Brill, 2019.
• MBENGUE, M. M. and ODILI, N., “The environmental management of water resources: what impact on the characterization of fresh water in international law?”, en TIGNINO, M. and BRÉTHAUT, C. (edits.), Research Handbook on Freshwater Law and International Relations, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 68-95.
• MCCAFFREY, S. C., “Environmental Law and Freshwater Ecosystems”, en SOBENES, E. et al. (eds.), Nicaragua Before the International Court of Justice. Impacts on International Law, Springer, 2018, pp. 347-367.
• MCCAFFREY, S. C., “Intertwined general principles”, en MCCAFFREY, S. C., et al. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Water Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, pp. 83-94.
• MCCAFFREY, S. C., “Some developments in the Law of International Watercourses”, en KOHEN, M. (ed.), Promoting justice, human rights and conflict resolution through International Law: Liber amicorum Lucius Caflisch, Nijhoff, Leiden, 2007, pp. 781-798.
• MCCAFFREY, S. C., “The customary law of international watercourses”, en TIGNINO, M. and BRÉTHAUT, C. (edits.), Research Handbook on Freshwater Law and International Relations, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 147-174. MCCRACKEN, M. & MEYER, C., “Monitoring of Transboundary Water Cooperation: Review of Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.5.2 Methodology”, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 563, 2018, pp. 1-12.
• MCCRACKEN, M. and WOLF, A. T., “Updating the Register of International River Basins of the world”, International Journal of Water resources development, Vol. 35, Issue 5, 2019, pp. 732-782
• MCINTYRE, O., “State responsibility in international law for transboundary water- related harm: The emergence of a new ecosystems-based paradigm?, Review of European, Comparative, and International Environmental Law, Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp.430-441.
• MCINTYRE, O., “Environmental protection and the ecosystem approach”, en MCCAFFREY, S. C., et al. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Water Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, pp. 126-146.
• MCINTYRE, O., “The contribution of procedural rules to the environmental protection of transboundary rivers in light of recent ICJ case law”, en BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, L., et al. (edits.), International Water Law. The Multiple Challenges, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012, pp. 239-265.
• MESHEL, T., “Swimming Against the Current: Revisiting the Principles of International Water Law in the Resolution of Fresh Water Disputes”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 61, nº 1, 2020, pp. 135-184
• MOUSSA, J., “Implications of the Indus Water Kishenganga Artbitration for the international law of watercourses and the environment”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 64, Issue 3, 2015, pp. 700-703.
• MOVILLA PATEIRO, L., La dimensión normativa de la gobernanza internacional del agua dulce, Tirant lo Blanch, 2021.
• MOVILLA PATEIRO, L. and ECKSTEIN, G., “An Historical Overview of the Evolution and Broadening of International Water Law”, in ECKSTEIN, G. (ed.), World Scientific Handbook of Transboundary Water, World Scientific Publishing (en prensa, 2023).
• MOVILLA PATEIRO, L., El Derecho Internacional del Agua: los acuíferos transfronterizos, Bosch Editor, Barcelona, 2014.
• O’ DONNELL, E., Legal rights for rivers. Competition, collaboration and water governance, Routledge, 2019. ONU PROGRAMA PARA EL MEDIO AMBIENTE, Perspectivas del medio ambiente mundial – GEO 6: Planeta saludable, gente saludable, Nairobi, 2019.
• PAQUEROT, S., Eau douce: la nécessaire refondation du droit international, Presses de l’Université du Québec, Québec, 2005.
• RIEU-CLARKE, A., MOYNIHAN, R., MAGSIG, B-O., UN Watercourses convention. User´s guide, IHP-HELP Centre for water Law, Policy and Science, University of Dundee, 2012.
• RODRIGO HERNÁNDEZ, A. J., “La aportación del Asunto Gabcikovo- Nagymaros al Derecho Internacional del Medio Ambiente”, Anuario de Derecho Internacional, Vol. XIV, 1998, pp. 769-807.
• RUDALL, J., “Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 112, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 288-294.
• RUDALL, J., “The interplay between the UN Watercourses Convention and international environmental law”, en BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, L., et al. (edits.), The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Non- Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 428-450.
• SALMAN, M. A. S., “Downstream riparians can also harm upstream riparians: the concept of foreclosure of future uses”, Water International, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 350-364.
• SANDS, P., “Water and international law: science and evidence in international litigation”, Environmental law and management, Vol. 22, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 151-161.
• SINDICO, F., International Law and Transboundary Aquifers, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
• SPIJKERS, O., “The Cross‐fertilization between the Sustainable Development Goals and International Water Law”, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, Vol. 25, Issue 1, 2016, pp. 39-49.
• TANZI, A., The relationship between the 1992 UN/ECE Convention on the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and international lakes and the 1997 UN Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. Report of the UN/ECE Task Force on Legal and Administrative Aspects, Geneva, February 2000.
• UNEP, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for assessment, Island Press, 2003.
• UNEP, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Vol. 1. Island Press, 2005.
• UN-WATER, The United Nations global water conventions: Fostering sustainable development and peace, Geneva, 2020.
• VIÑUALES, J. E., “La protección ambiental en el Derecho consuetudinario internacional”, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, Vol. 69, nº 2, 2017, pp. 71-91.