The semantics of Caer

  1. Xosé Soto Andión 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Actas:
19th ICL papers: International Congress of Linguists, Geneva 20-27 July 2013

Editorial: Département de Linguistique de l’Université de Genève, Switzerland

ISBN: 978-2-8399-1580-9

Ano de publicación: 2013

Congreso: Congrès International des Linguistes, Genève 20-27 Juillet 2013

Tipo: Achega congreso

GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Resumo

The aim of this paper is to analyse constructions with Caer as nucleus in Galician incontrast with Spanish. We will try to examine the variety os these structures to prove, inthe light of the theory of the construction and in the theoretical frame of the semanticsyntactic schemes, that this predicate cannot be compartmentalized within a singlesemantic class of action and movement, since it takes part in constructions of action,process, state, situation. With a basis on the concept of construction, we will try toproject this semantic concept into these structures in order to analyse these newschemes, new contents and a new semantic roles, something important in order to verifythe relevance of lexis, semantics and syntax interface in languages.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • SANTAMARINA, Antón 2011: Tesouro informatizado da lingua galega, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Instituto da Lingua Galega, http://www.ti.usc.es/TILG
  • SOTO ANDIÓN, Xosé 1993-2000: Gravacións (60 hours), unedited transcript material collected from several places in Galicia.
  • ACKEMA, Peter / Maaike SCHOORLEMMER 1994: The middle construction and the syntaxsemantics interface. Lingua 93:59-90.
  • ACKEMA, Peter / Maaike SCHOORLEMMER 2006: Middles. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell. 131-203.
  • ALEXIADOU, Artemis / Elena ANAGNOSTOPOULOU & Martin EVERAERT (ed.) 2003: The unaccusativity puzzle: explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • BALTIN, Mark R. 2001: A-movements. In: Martin Baltin / Chris Collins, The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 226-254.
  • BERTINETTO, Pier Marco / Denis Delfitto 2000: Aspect vs Actionality: Why they Should be Kept Apart. In Osten Dalh (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 189-226.
  • CARPENTER, Bob 1997: Type-logical semantics grammar. Cambridge & Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • COMRIE, Bernard 2008: What is passive? In: Zarina Estrada et al. (ed.), Studies in voice and transitivity. Munichs: Lincom. 1-18
  • CREGO, María Victorina 2000: El complemento locativo en español. Los verbos de movimiento y su combinatoria sintáctico-semántica. Lalia, 12. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
  • CROFT, William 2001: Radical Construction Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • DIK, Simon C. 1997: The theory of Functional Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • FEUILLET, Jack. Ed.1998: Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
  • GOLDBERG, Adele, E. 1995: Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • GOLDBERG, Adele, E. 2005: Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander K. 1967: «Notes on transitivity and theme», Journal of Linguistics 3:37-81.
  • HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander K. Halliday / Christian Mathiessen 2004: An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold. 280-305.
  • HOPPER, Paul J. / Sandra A. THOMPSON 1980: «Transitivity in grammar and discourse», Language 56: 251-299.
  • KAY, Paul 1997: Words and the grammar of context. Stanford: CSLI.
  • KIBRIK, Aleksandr E. 1997: «Beyond subject and object: toward a comprehensive relational typology». Linguistic Typology 1-3: 279-346.
  • LANDAU, Idan 1999: «Psych-adjectives and semantic selection», The linguistic review 16: 333-358.
  • LANGACKER, Ronald, W. 1991: Cognitive grammar. In: Flip G. DROSTE / John E. JOSEPH (eds.), Linguistic theory and grammatical description. Amsterdam: John Benjamin: 275-306.
  • LAZARD, Gilbert 2002: Definition des actants dans les langues européennes. In: Jack FEUILLET (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter: 11-146.
  • LEVIN, Beth 1993: English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • MARTINET, Andrée 1993: Función y dinámica de las lenguas. Madrid: Gredos.
  • MENDIKOETXEA, Amaya 1999: Constructions with se: middle, passive and impersonal. In: Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.). Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. II: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales). Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe. 1631-1722.
  • MIGUEL, Elena de 1999: El aspecto léxico. In: Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.),Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española Vol. II: Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa-Calpe. 2977-3070.
  • MORIMOTO, Yuko 2001: Los verbos de movimiento. Madrid: Visor.
  • PRIMUS, Beatrice 1999: Cases and Thematic roles. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  • ROTHSTEIN, Susan 2004: Structuring Events. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • ROTHSTEIN, Susan (ed.): 2008. Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • SÁNCHEZ LÓPEZ, Cristina (ed.) 2002: Las construcciones con se. Madrid: Visor.
  • SMITH, Carlota 1997: The Parameter of Aspect, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • SOTO ANDIÓN, Xosé 2010: «La semántica de pasar: análisis y variación», Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 126 (3): 480-513.
  • SOTO ANDIÓN, Xosé 2010: «Structures with Saír in Galician», Modern Language Review 155, 2: 411-438.
  • SOTO ANDIÓN, Xosé 2011: «La semántica de los estados en gallego», Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, CXII: 3: 323-364.
  • SOTO ANDIÓN, Xosé 2013: «La semántica de volver en gallego», Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 90,4: 375-401.
  • TALMY, Leonard 1985: Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In: Timothy SHOPEN (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57-149.
  • TESNIÈRE, Lucien 1959: Éléments de syntaxe structurale, Paris, Klincksieck, 1969 [Spanish version Elementos de sintaxis estructural (1994). Madrid: Gredos.
  • THIEROFF, Rolf 2000: On the Areal Distribution of Tense–Aspect Categories in Europe. In: Osten Dalh (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, 265-305.
  • VAN HOUT, Angeliek 2002: Projections based on event structure. In: Martin EVERAERT et al. (eds), Lexical specification and insertion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 397-422.
  • VAN VALIN, Robert D. / Randy J. LAPOLLA 1997: Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • VERKUYL, Henk 1993: A theory of aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • VILELA, Mário 1999: Gramática da língua portuguesa. Coimbra: Livraria Almedina