Examining the Role of Technology Transfer on Digitalization: Consequences and Challenges

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30.
• Adebanjo, D., Laosirihongthong, T., Samaranayake, P., & Teh, P. L. (2021). Key enablers of industry 4.0 development at firm level: Findings from an emerging economy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
• Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618.
• Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G. (2021). COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research, 136, 602–611.
• Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Wright, M. (2014). Technology transfer in a global economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301–312.
• Bengoa, A., Maseda, A., Iturralde, T., & Aparicio, G. (2021). A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(5), 1514–1550.
• Chen, L. S. L., & Chen, J. H. (2021). Antecedents and optimal industrial customers on cloud services adoption. The Service Industries Journal, 41(9–10), 606–632.
• Chen, Y., Visnjic, I., Parida, V., & Zhang, Z. (2021). On the road to digital servitization–The (dis)continuous interplay between business model and digital technology. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 41(5), 694–722.
• Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127–145.
• Barykin, S. Y., Kapustina, I. V., Kirillova, T. V., Yadykin, V. K., & Konnikov, Y. A. (2020). Economics of digital ecosystems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 124.
• Block, J. H., Fisch, C., & Diegel, W. (2022). Schumpeterian entrepreneurial digital identity and funding from venture capital firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–39.
• Braxton, J. C., & Taska, B. (2023). Technological change and the consequences of job loss. American Economic Review, 113(2), 279–316.
• Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A., Romano, M., & Santoro, G. (2021). Human resource management and digitalization. In Digital Transformation management for agile organizations: a compass to sail the digital world (pp. 117–138). Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton and Company.
• Choi, H. J. (2009). Technology transfer issues and a new technology transfer model. Journal of Technology Studies, 35(1), 49–57.
• Ciampaglia, G. L. (2018). Fighting fake news: A role for computational social science in the fight against digital misinformation. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1(1), 147–153.
• Cubric, M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technology in Society, 62, 101257.
• Cullen, R. (2001). Addressing the digital divide. Online Information Review, 25(5), 311–320.
• Dalcher, D. (2007). Why the pilot cannot be blamed: A cautionary note about excessive reliance on technology. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 7(3), 350.
• Das, A., & Jedlicka, A. (1993). Social impact analysis on technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 18(1–2), 49–54.
• Davenport, T. H., Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A., & Wilson, H. J. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The insights you need from harvard business review. Harvard Business Press.
• Del Giudice, M., Scuotto, V., Papa, A., Tarba, S. Y., Bresciani, S., & Warkentin, M. (2021). A self-tuning model for smart manufacturing SMEs: Effects on digital innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 68–89.
• Denicolai, S., Zucchella, A., & Magnani, G. (2021). Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120650.
• Elmaghraby, A. S., & Losavio, M. M. (2014). Cyber security challenges in Smart Cities: Safety, security and privacy. Journal of Advanced Research, 5(4), 491–497.
• Ferrer-Serrano, M., Fuentelsaz, L., & Latorre-Martinez, M. P. (2021a). Examining knowledge transfer and networks: An overview of the last twenty years. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(8), 2007–2037.
• Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martínez, M. P., & Fuentelsaz, L. (2021b). The European research landscape under the Horizon 2020 Lenses: The interaction between science centers, public institutions, and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(3), 828–853.
• Ferrer-Serrano, M., Latorre-Martinez, M.-P., & Lozano-Blasco, R. (2020). Universities and communication: Role of Twitter during the beginning of the Covid-19 health crisis. Profesional de la Información, 18–18.
• Fini, R., Perkmann, M., Kenney, M., & Maki, K. M. (2023). Are public subsidies effective for university spinoffs? Evidence from SBIR awards in the University of California system. Research Policy, 52(1), 104662.
• Fobbe, L., & Hilletofth, P. (2021). The role of stakeholder interaction in sustainable business models. A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129510.
• Foundry. (2023). State of the CIO study 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://foundryco.com/tools-for-marketers/research-state-of-the-cio/
• Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.
• Gensch, C.-O., Prakash, S., & Hilbert, I. (2017). Is digitalization a driver for sustainability? (pp. 117–129).
• Gobble, M. M. (2018). Digitalization, digitization, and innovation. Research-Technology Management, 61(4), 56–59.
• Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.
• Grimes, S., & Sun, Y. (2014). Implications of China’s on-going dependence on foreign technology. Geoforum, 54, 59–69.
• Hagberg, J., Sundstrom, M., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2016). The digitalization of retailing: An exploratory framework. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 44(7), 694–712.
• Hellsten, P., & Paunu, A. (2020). Digitalization: A concept easier to talk about than to understand. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010145302260233
• ITU. (2021). Facts and Figures 2021: 2.9 billion people still offline. International Telecommunications Union. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from https://www.itu.int/hub/2021/11/facts-and-figures-2021-2-9-billion-people-still-offline/
• João, B., Nascimento, D., Souza, C. L. D., & Serralvo, F. A. (2020). A systematic review of smart cities and the internet of things as a research topic. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 17, 1115–1130.
• Johnson, D., Gianiodis, P. T., Harrison, R. T., & Bock, A. J. (2023). From laboratory to clinic: Science commercialization within university-centered entrepreneurial ecosystems. R&D Management, 53(1), 3–23.
• Karnani, F. (2013). The university’s unknown knowledge: Tacit knowledge, technology transfer and university spinoffs findings from an empirical study based on the theory of knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 235–250.
• Kaushik, A., Kumar, S., Luthra, S., & Haleem, A. (2014). Technology transfer: Enablers and barriers—A review. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 14(2), 133.
• Kedia, B. L., & Bhagat, R. S. (1988). Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management. The Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 559.
• Kirchberger, M. A., & Pohl, L. (2016). Technology commercialization: A literature review of success factors and antecedents across different contexts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1077–1112.
• Kotabe, M., Martin, X., & Domoto, H. (2003). Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 293–316.
• Kshetri, N. (2018). Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80–89.
• Lai, J., & Widmar, N. O. (2021). Revisiting the digital divide in the COVID-19 era. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(1), 458–464.
• Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242.
• Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2018). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. Pearson Education.
• Lin, C., Tan, B., & Chang, S. (2002). The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(6), 300–308.
• López-Manuel, L., Sartal, A., & Vázquez, X. H. (2022). Making a virtue of necessity once again: Assessing the effect of temporary labor on lean practices in highly routinized environments. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma , ahead-of-print.
• Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359.
• Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343.
• Mellal, M. A. (2020). Obsolescence—A review of the literature. Technology in Society, 63, 101347.
• Millar, C. C. J. M., & Choi, C. J. (2009). Reverse knowledge and technology transfer: Imbalances caused by cognitive barriers in asymmetric relationships. International Journal of Technology Management, 48(3), 389.
• Muench, S., Stoermer, E., Jensen, K., Asikainen, T., Salvi, M., & Scapolo, F. (2022). (2022): Towards a green and digital future, EUR 31075 EN. Publications Office of the European Union.
• Nagel, L. (2020). The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digital transformation of work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 861–875.
• Neves, P., Almeida, P., & Velez, M. J. (2018). Reducing intentions to resist future change: Combined effects of commitment-based HR practices and ethical leadership. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 249–261.
• OECD. (2022). The twin transitions: Are digital technologies the key to a clean energy future?. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from https://oecd.ai/en/wonk/twin-transitions
• Ockwell, D. G., Haum, R., Mallett, A., & Watson, J. (2010). Intellectual property rights and low carbon technology transfer: Conflicting discourses of diffusion and development. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 729–738.
• Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(1), 63–77.
• Phan, P. H., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer: Lessons learned, managerial and policy implications, and the road forward. SSRN Electronic Journal.
• Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B., & Nlemvo, F. (2003). Toward a typology of university spinoffs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 355–369.
• Raptis, T. P., Passarella, A., & Conti, M. (2019). data management in industry 4.0: State of the art and open challenges. IEEE Access, 7, 97052–97093.
• Ras, E., Wild, F., Stahl, C., & Baudet, A. (2017). Bridging the skills gap of workers in industry 4.0 by human performance augmentation tools: Challenges and roadmap. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (pp. 428–432).
• Rasnacis, A., & Berzisa, S. (2017). Method for adaptation and implementation of agile project management methodology. Procedia Computer Science, 104, 43–50.
• Reyna, A., Martín, C., Chen, J., Soler, E., & Díaz, M. (2018). On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 88, 173–190.
• Ribaupierre, S., & Eagleson, R. (2017). Editorial: Challenges for the usability of AR and VR for clinical neurosurgical procedures. Healthcare Technology Letters, 4(5), 151–151.
• Ritter, T., & Pedersen, C. L. (2020). Digitization capability and the digitalization of business models in business-to-business firms: Past, present, and future. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 180–190.
• Rodrigues, A. R. D., Ferreira, F. A., Teixeira, F. J., & Zopounidis, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence, digital transformation and cybersecurity in the banking sector: A multi-stakeholder cognition-driven framework. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101616.
• Romero, D., Gaiardelli, P., Powell, D., Wuest, T., & Thürer, M. (2018). Digital lean cyber-physical production systems: The emergence of digital lean manufacturing and the significance of digital waste (pp. 11–20).
• Roy, M., & Roy, A. (2019). Nexus of internet of things (IoT) and big data: Roadmap for smart management systems (SMgS). IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(2), 53–65.
• Sartal, A., Llach, J., & León-Mateos, F. (2022). Do technologies really affect that much? Exploring the potential of several industry 4.0 technologies in today’s lean manufacturing shop floors. Operational Research, 22(5), 6075–6106.
• Schmitz, A., Urbano, D., Dandolini, G. A., de Souza, J. A., & Guerrero, M. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: A systematic literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 369–395.
• Sengupta, A., & Rossi, F. (2023). The relationship between universities’ funding portfolios and their knowledge exchange profiles: A dynamic capabilities view. Technovation, 121, 102686.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 115–142.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.
• Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595.
• Siponen, M., & Vance, A. (2010). Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. MIS Quarterly, 487–502.
• Skog, D. A., Wimelius, H., & Sandberg, J. (2018). Digital disruption. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(5), 431–437.
• Ten, C.-W., Manimaran, G., & Liu, C.-C. (2010). Cybersecurity for critical infrastructures: Attack and defense modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 40(4), 853–865.
• Tortorella, G. L., Fogliatto, F. S., Espôsto, K. F., Vergara, A. M. C., Vassolo, R., Mendoza, D. T., & Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Effects of contingencies on healthcare 4.0 technologies adoption and barriers in emerging economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 120048.
• Trim, P. R., & Lee, Y. I. (2021). The global cyber security model: Counteracting cyber attacks through a resilient partnership arrangement. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(3), 32.
• UNESCO. (2021). Recommendations on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• UNCTAD. (2021). Digital economy report 2020: Cross-border data flows and development: For whom the data flow. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
• UNEP. (2021). Emissions gap report 2021. The Heat Is On. A world of climate promises not yet delivered. United Nations Environment Programme.
• Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.
• Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
• Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., et al. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 233.
• WEF. (2018). The future of jobs 2018. World Economic Forum.
• WEF. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum.
• WEF. (2021). The global risks report 2021. World Economic Forum.
• WEF. (2022). Digital solutions can reduce global emissions by up to 20%. Here’s how. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/05/how-digital-solutions-can-reduce-global-emissions/
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 147–150.
• Zhang, J., & Fan, Y. (2021). Recommending collaborations with newly emerged services for composition creation in cloud manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 34(3), 307–326.
• Zoppelletto, A., Orlandi, L. B., Zardini, A., Rossignoli, C., & Kraus, S. (2023). Organizational roles in the context of digital transformation: A micro-level perspective. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113563.