Hipótesis sobre el (des)encuentro entre la investigación artística y la investigación científica.
- Fuentes Cid, Sara
- Cordovil, João L.
ISSN: 1390-4825, 2477-9199
Ano de publicación: 2021
Número: 12
Páxinas: 179-194
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Index, revista de arte contemporáneo
Resumo
Fortunately, artistic research has become more accepted by academia in recent years and the potential for a mutually beneficial relationship between Art and Science seems more promising than ever. Despite this, tensions and reluctance continue to exist that excessively hinder the development of interdisciplinary projects where Art is involved.In this paper we will try, in the first place, to analyze comparatively artistic research and scientific research in the light of four classic domains of the Philosophy of Science: language, mereology, method and truth; secondly, we will formulate two hypotheses on (1) the reasons for the persistent disagreement between Art and Science, based on the separation between rationalism and empiricism and (2) on the possibility of encounter, based on the speculative use of reason, between the artistic and scientific research; two methodologically different views on the same concepts or metaphysical problems.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Ayer, A. J. (1952). Language, Truth and Logic, New York: Dover Publications.
- Bachelard, G. (2006). A epistemologia. [L´épistemologie. Presses Universitaires de France. (1971)] (Trad. F. Godinho y M. Oliveira). Lisboa: Edições 70.
- Borgdorff, H. (2012). The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden University Press, Amsterdam.
- Borgdorff, H; Peters, P; Pinch, T. (Ed.) (2020). Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies. New York: Routledge.
- Brewster, D. (1855). Memoirs of the Life, Writings, and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton. Volumen II, capítulo 27.
- Calvino, I. (2010). Porquê ler os Clássicos [Perché leggere i classici. (2002)] (Trad. Cecília Andrade). Lisboa: Edições don Quixote.
- De Laiglesia, J.F. (2003). Máquina para dibujar metáforas. Pontevedra: Diputación Provincial.
- De Laiglesia, J.F. (2008). “Ideología institucional y carácter Autorreflejo del Arte” en De Laiglesia, J.F.; Caeiro, M. y Fuentes, S. Notas para una investigación artística. Pontevedra: Universidade de Vigo.
- Eisner, E. (2005) El Arte en las Ciencias Sociales. Revista Enfoques Educacionales 7 (1): 81-91.
- Eisner, E. (2008). Art and Knowledge en J. Knowles y A. Cole. Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues. (pp.3-12). London: Sage.
- Fernández del Buey, F. (1991). Un experimento casi crucial para el debate contemporáneo sobre el método: James Watson describe el descubrimiento de la doble hélice en La ilusión del método. Barcelona: Crítica.
- Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against the method. London: New left books.
- Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of Worldmaking, USA: Hackett Publishing Company.
- Hannula, M; Suoranta, J. and Vadén, T. (Eds.) (2005). Artistic research – Theories, methods and practices. Helsinki: Academy of Fine Arts, Finland and Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Henke, S; Mersch, D. et al. (eds.) (2020). Manifesto of Artistic Research. A defense against its advocates. Zurich: Diaphanes.
- Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding Philosophy of Science. London and New York: Routledge.
- Lévy-Leblond, J-M. (2007) “La ciencia y el mundo, el arte y yo. Una entrevista a Lévv-Leblond”. En J. IBÁÑEZ. El Discurso Científico, los Conceptos Contrarios y la Perspectiva de Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond. Recuperado de: www.madrimasd.org
- Llopis Goig, R. (2008). La tercera cultura de Brockman. Revista A distancia, V. 23 (4), 169-175.
- Macleod, K., (Ed.) (2013). Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research. New York: Routledge.
- Markie, P. (2017) "Rationalism vs. Empiricism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
- Marina, J. A. (1998). La selva del lenguaje. Introducción a un diccionario de los sentimientos. Barcelona: Anagrama.
- Mersch, D. (2015). Epistemology of Aesthetics. Zurich: Institute for Critical Theory-Zurich University of the Arts and the Centre for Arts and Cultural Theory.
- Michelkevičius, V. (2018). Mapping Artistic Research: Towards Diagrammatic Knowing. Vilnius Academy of Arts Press. Moles, A. (1986) La creación científica. Madrid: Taurus.
- Moraza, J.L y Cuesta, S. (2010) El Arte como criterio de excelencia. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación e Instituto de Arte Contemporáneo. Recuperado de https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/campus-de-excelencia-internacional-el-arte-como-criterio-de-excelencia/universidad-espana/14479
- Morin, E. (1997). El método. La naturaleza de la Naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.
- Morin, E. (2001). La mente bien ordenada. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
- Newton, I. (2010). Princípios Matemáticos de Filosofia Natural [Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687)] (Trad. J. Resina Rodrigues). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
- Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Popper, K. (1982). A teoria dos quanta e o cisma na física [Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics. London: Hutchinson], (Trad. Nuno Ferreira da Fonseca). Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.
- Prophet, J. (2011). El artista en el laboratorio: una cooperación razonablemente traicionera. Artnodes. Revista de Arte, Ciencia y Tecnología, nº 11, 39-44.
- Ricoeur, P. (1980). La metáfora viva. Madrid: Ediciones Europa.
- Schindler, J. (2018). Subjectivity and Synchrony in Artistic Research: Ethnographic Insights. transcript Verlag.
- Schrenk, M. (2017). Metaphysics of Science. New York: Routledge.
- Schwab, M. (2018). Transpositions: Aesthetico-Epistemic Operators in Artistic Research. Leuven University Press.
- Snow, C. P. (1987). Las dos culturas y un segundo enfoque. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
- Vicente, S. (2003). Arte y Ciencia. Reflexiones en torno a sus relaciones. Huellas, nº3, 85-94.
- Wilson, S. (2002). Information Arts. Intersections of art, science and technology. London: The MIT Press.