Incommensurability in Evolutionary Biology: The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis Controversy

Referencias bibliográficas

• Andersen H, Hepburn B (2013) Scientific change. In: The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/scientific-change/. Accessed 30 May 2022
• Baedke J, Fábregas-Tejeda A, Vergara-Silva F (2020) Does the extended evolutionary synthesis entail extended explanatory power? Biol Philos 35:20
• Bird A (2005) Naturalizing Kuhn. Proc Aristot Soc 105:109–127
• Bird A (2008) Incommensurability naturalized. In: Soler L, Sankey H, Hoyningen-Huene P (eds) Rethinking scientific change and theory comparison. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–39
• Chang H (2013) Incommensurability: revisiting the chemical revolution. In: Kindi V, Arabatzis T (eds) Kuhn’s structure of scientific revolutions revisited. Routledge, pp 153–178
• Danchin E, Charmantier A, Champagne FA, Mesoudi A, Pujol B, Blanchet S (2011) Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 12:475–486
• Danchin E, Pocheville A (2014) Inheritance is where physiology meets evolution. J Physiol 592:2307–2317
• Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, New York
• Dickins TE, Rahman Q (2012) The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279(1740):2913–2921
• Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York
• Fábregas-Tejeda A, Vergara-Silva F (2018) Hierarchy theory of evolution and the extended evolutionary synthesis: some epistemic bridges, some conceptual rifts. Evol Biol 45:127–139
• Feldman MW, Odling-Smee J, Laland KN (2017) Why Gupta et al.’s critique of niche construction theory is off target. J Genet 96:505–508
• Feyerabend PK (1962) Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In: Feigl H, Maxwell G (eds) Scientific explanation, space and time. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol 3. University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, pp 28–97
• Freeman S, Herron JC (2004) Evolutionary analysis. Pearson, New Jersey
• Futuyma DJ (2009) Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
• Futuyma DJ (2017) Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis. Interface Focus 7:20160145
• Gefaell J, Saborido C (2022) Incommensurability and the extended evolutionary synthesis: taking Kuhn seriously. Eur J Philos Sci 12:24
• Godfrey-Smith P (1996) Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Gupta M, Prasad NG, Dey S, Joshi A, Vidya TNC (2017a) Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche? J Genet 96:491–504
• Gupta M, Prasad NG, Dey S, Joshi A, Vidya TNC (2017b) Feldman et al. do protest too much, we think. J Genet 96:509–511
• Hoyningen-Huene P (1990) Kuhn’s conception of incommensurability. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 21:481–492
• Hoyningen-Huene P (1993) Reconstructing scientific revolutions. Thomas Kuhn’s philosophy of science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
• Hoyningen-Huene P, Sankey H (eds) (2001) Incommensurability and related matters. Springer
• Hull DL (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:311–332
• Kuhn TS (1963) The function of dogma in scientific research. In: Crombie A (ed) Scientific change. Heineman Educational Books, London, pp 347–369
• Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
• Kuhn TS (1977) The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
• Kuhn TS (2000a) Commensurability, comparability, communicability. In: Conant J, Haugeland J (eds) The road since the structure. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 33–57
• Kuhn TS (2000b) The trouble with the historical philosophy of science. In: Conant J, Haugeland J (eds) The road since the structure. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 105–120
• Kuhn TS (2000c) Afterwards. In: Conant J, Haugeland J (eds) The road since the structure. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 224–252
• Laland KN (2017) Schism and synthesis at the Royal Society. Trends Ecol Evol 32:316–317
• Laland KN (2018) Evolution unleashed. Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/science-in-flux-is-a-revolution-brewing-in-evolutionary-theory. Accessed 26 Oct 2021
• Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T (2013) More on how and why: cause and effect in biology revisited. Biol Philos 28:719–745
• Laland KN, Sterelny K, Odling-Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T (2011) Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science 334:1512–1516
• Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161–164
• Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW et al (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20151019
• Lynch M (2007) The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8597–8604
• Martínez M, Esposito M (2014) Multilevel causation and the extended synthesis. Biol Theory 9:209–220
• Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Harvard
• Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506
• Mayr E (1994) The advance of science and scientific revolutions. J Hist Behav Sci 30:328–334
• Mayr E (2004) What makes biology unique? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Mesoudi A, Blanchet S, Charmantier A et al (2013) Is non-genetic inheritance just a proximate mechanism? A corroboration of the extended evolutionary synthesis. Biol Theory 7:189–195
• Müller GB (2007) Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nat Rev Genet 8:943–949
• Müller GB (2017) Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary. Interface Focus 7:20170015
• Noble D (2012) A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation. Interface Focus 2:55–64
• Noble D (2015) Evolution beyond neo-Darwinism: a new conceptual framework. J Exp Biol 218:7–13
• Odling-Smee J, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
• Pigliucci M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 61:2743–2749
• Pigliucci M (2009) An extended synthesis for evolutionary biology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1168:218–228
• Pigliucci M (2012) Biology’s last paradigm shift. Paradigmi 3:45–58
• Pigliucci M (2017) Darwinism after the modern synthesis. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer International Publishing, pp 89–103
• Pigliucci M, Müller GB (eds) (2010) Evolution, the extended synthesis. The MIT Press, Cambridge
• Politi V (2018) Scientific revolutions, specialization and the discovery of the structure of DNA: toward a new picture of the development of the sciences. Synthese 195:2267–2293
• Politi V (2019) Specialisation and the incommensurability among scientific specialties. J Gen Philos Sci 50:129–144
• Provine WB (1971) The origins of theoretical population genetics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
• Psillos S (2018) Realism and theory change in science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-theory-change/. Accessed 31 May 2022
• Ridley M (2004) Evolution. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
• Rouse J (2003) Kuhn’s philosophy of scientific practice. In: Nickles T (ed) Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–121
• Sankey H (1993) Kuhn’s changing concept of incommensurability. Br J Philos Sci 44:759–774
• Scott-Phillips TC, Laland KN, Shuker DM et al (2014) The niche construction perspective: a critical appraisal. Evolution 68:1231–1243
• Smocovitis VB (1992) Unifying biology: the evolutionary synthesis and evolutionary biology. J Hist Biol 25:1–65
• Svensson EI (2023) The structure of evolutionary theory: beyond neo-Darwinism, neo-Lamarckism and biased historical narratives about the modern synthesis. In: Dickins TE, Dickins BJA (eds) Evolutionary biology: contemporary and historical reflections upon core theory. Springer, pp 173–217
• Tanghe KB, De Tiège A, Pauwels L, Blancke S, Braeckman J (2018) What’s wrong with the modern evolutionary synthesis? A critical reply to Welch (2017). Biol Philos 33:23
• Tanghe KB, Pauwels L, De Tiège A, Braeckman J (2021) Interpreting the history of evolutionary biology through a Kuhnian prism: sense or nonsense? Perspect Sci 29:1–35
• Uller T, Feiner N, Radersma R et al (2019) Developmental plasticity and evolutionary explanations. Evol Dev 2:47–55
• Uller T, Helanterä H (2017) Heredity and evolutionary theory. In: Walsh D, Huneman P (eds) Challenging the modern synthesis: adaptation, development, and inheritance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–316
• Uller T, Helanterä H (2019) Niche construction and conceptual change in evolutionary biology. Br J Philos Sci 70:351–375
• Walsh DM (2015) Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Walsh DM (2016) Challenges to evolutionary theory. In: Humphreys P (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 671–694
• Welch JJ (2017) What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? Biol Philos 32:263–279
• Wray KB (2005) Rethinking scientific specialization. Soc Stud Sci 35:151–164
• Wray KB (2011) Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge