Eficacia del programa EPI.com para la estimulación de las habilidades lectoras en Educación Infantil

  1. Fernando Tellado 1
  2. Marisol Cueli 2
  3. Paloma González-Castro 2
  4. Celestino Rodríguez 2
  5. Estefanía Fernández-Vázquez 1
  6. Ana Isabel Álvarez 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Journal:
Revista de Psicología y Educación

ISSN: 1699-9517

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 11

Issue: 2

Pages: 43-64

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de Psicología y Educación

Abstract

Nowadays, student difficulties in reading are even more evident than before. Hence, the importance of implementing, since the beginning of schooling, strategy-based interventions such as “Epi.com”. This strategy aims to encourage reading and information processing in students from the age of 3. The aim of this work is to analyze the effectiveness of EPI.com improving reading and cognitive processes in a sample of Preschool children. 25 students aged 5 to 6 years were involved in the study (divided into experimental and control groups). They complete the Reading Initial Battery 3-6 (BIL in Spanish) and the Cognitive Assessment System DN-CAS. Results indicate that students who use EPI.com show a significant improvement in both reading and cognitive processes after the intervention. These results are discussed in the light of previous literature, and future lines of research are suggested.

Bibliographic References

  • Álvarez, L., y González-Castro, P. (2012). EPI.com programa de refuerzo para estimular el pensamiento y la inteligencia. Madrid: EOS.
  • Álvarez, L., González-Castro, P., y Soler, E. (2000). Del hipertexto como guía de navegación al hypertexto como procesador de información. Aula Abierta, 75,27-37.
  • Álvarez, L., López, C., González - Pienda, J. A., Núñez, J. C., y González-Castro, P. (2002). Estrategias para atender a la diversidad desde educación infantil. EduPsykhé; Revista de Psicología y Psicopedagogía, 1(2), 313-330.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1982). Psicología educativa: un punto de vista cognoscitivo. México: Trillas. Original: Educational Psychology: A Cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968
  • Bartl-Pokorny, K. D., Pokorny, F., Boelte, S., Langmann, A., FalckYtter, T., Wolin, T., … & Marschik, P. B. (2013). Eye tracking in basic research and clinical practice. Klinische Neurophysiologie, 44(3), 193-198. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343458
  • Bellocchi, S., Muneaux, M., Bastien-Toniazzo, M., y Ducrot, S. (2013). I can read it in your eyes: What eye movements tells us about visuo-attentional processes in developmental dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 452-460. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.002
  • Berget. G., y Sandnes, F. E. (2015). The effect of dyslexia on searching visual and textual content: Are icons really useful? 9th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI) held as part of 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Los Angeles, CA. AUG 02-07, 2015
  • Casal, J., y Mateu, E. (2003). Tipos de muestreo. Revista de Epidemiología y Medicina Preventiva, 1, 3-7.
  • Castejón, L., González-Pumariega, S., y Cuetos, F. (2015). El desarrollo de la fluidez en la lectura de palabras en educación primaria: un seguimiento longitudinal de seis años. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38(4), 842-871.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Das, J. P., y Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • De Corte, E., Verschffel, L., y Van De Ven, A. (2001). Improving test comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: A design experiment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 531-559. doi:10.1348/000709901158668
  • Dennis, L. R. (2015). The effects of a multi-component intervention on preschool children’s literacy skills. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1177/0271121415577399
  • Dreyer, C., y Nel, C. (2013). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365. doi: 10.1016/S0346251X(03)00047-2
  • Gallego, C. (2006). Los prerrequisitos lectores. Comunicación presentada en el Congreso Internacional de Lectoescritura, México.
  • Gil, M. D., y Vicent, C. (2009). Análisis comparativo de la eficacia de un programa lúdico-narrativo para la enseñanza de las matemáticas en Educación Infantil. Psicothema, 21(1), 70-75.
  • González-Castro, P., Rodríguez, C., Núñez, J. C., Vallejo, G., y González-Pienda, J. A. (2014). Altered visual sensory fusion in children with reading difficulties. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 119(3), 925-48. doi: 10.2466/15.10.PMS.119c27z6
  • González-Pienda, J. A., Álvarez, L., González-Castro, P., Núñez, J.C., Bernardo, A., y Álvarez, D. (2008). Estrategia hipertextual computerizada y construcción personal de significados. Psicothema, 20(1), 49-55.
  • Iglesias, E., y Ruiz, G. (1992). Aplicaciones de los hipertextos en educación. Anuales de Pedagogía, 10, 127-150.
  • Ise, E., y Schulte-Körne, G. (2013). Symptomatik, Diagnostik und Behandlung der Rechenstörung. Zeitschrift für Kinderund Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 41(4), 271–282. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/14224917/a000241
  • Kang, E. Y., McKenna, J. W., Arden, S., y Ciullo, S. (2015). Integrated reading and writing interventions for students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 31(1), 22-33. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12091
  • Martin, M. O., y Mullis, I. V. S. (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade. Implications for early learning. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
  • Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Nelson, T. H. (1988). Managing inmense storage: Project xanadu provides a model for the possible future of mass storage. Byte, 13(1), 225-238.
  • Petersen, D. B., Allen, M. M., y Spencer, T. D. (2016). Predicting reading difficulty in first grade using dynamic assessment of decoding in early kindergarten: A large-scale longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), 200-215. doi: 10.1177/0022219414538518
  • Petersen, D. B., y Gillam, R. B. (2015). Predicting reading ability for bilingual Hispanic children using dynamic assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 3-21. doi:10.1177/0022219413486930
  • Rodríguez, C., van den Boerb, M., Jiménez, J. E., y Jongb, P.F. (2015). Developmental changes in the relations between RAN, phonological awareness, and reading in Spanish children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(4), 273-288. doi:10.1080/10888438.201 5.1025271
  • Sellés, P., Martínez, T., y Vidal-Abarca, E. (2010). Batería de inicio a la lectura (BIL 3-6): Diseño y características psicométricas. Bordón 62(2), 137-160
  • Swanson, H. L., Howard, C. B., y Sáez, L. (2006). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 252-269. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390030501
  • Swanson, H. L., Kehler, P., y Jerman, O. (2010). Working memory, strategy knowledge, and strategy instruction in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 24-47. doi: 10.1177/0022219409338743.
  • Vagge, A., Cavanna, M., Traverso, C. E., y Iester, M. (2015). Evaluation of ocular movements in patients with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 65(1), 24-32. doi: 10.1007/s11881-015-0098-7
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos básicos superiores. Barcelona: Grijalbo.
  • Watson, M. R., Gable, A., Gear, B., y Hughes, C. (2012). EnvidenceBased strategies for improving the reading comprehension of secondary students: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 27(2), 79-89. doi: 10.1111/j.15405826.2012.00353.x
  • Willems, G., Jansma, B., Blomert, B., y Vaessen, A. (2016). Cognitive and familial risk evidence converged: A data-driven identification of distinct and homogeneous subtypes within the heterogeneous sample of reading disabled children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 53–54, 213-231. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.018
  • Wise, N., D’Angelo, N., y Chen, X. (2016). A school-based phonological awareness intervention for struggling readers in early French immersion. Reading and Writing, 29(2), 183-205. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9585-9
Data source: Dialnet