Adaptación al EEES. Razones jurídicas para la supervivencia del examen final
- María Teresa Ramiro Sánchez (coord.)
- Tamara Ramiro Sánchez (coord.)
- María Paz Bermúdez Sánchez (coord.)
Editorial: Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual AEPC
ISBN: 978-84-697-0237-6
Ano de publicación: 2014
Páxinas: 273-277
Congreso: Foro sobre la Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación Superior y de la Investigación (10. 2013. Granada)
Tipo: Achega congreso
Resumo
Antecedents: Continuous evaluation presents many legal problems. For instance, when the students can not assume the evaluation process or when they do not want to assume this method. The principal aim of this article is to determine whether or not the students have the right to do a final exam in order to obtain a 100% of the mark. Methodology: periodical meetings with the teachers. To analyze the acts and the academic regulations. Outcome: I have observed many loopholes in the legal framework of the EEES. Conclusions: (1) Continuous evaluation presents many legal problems. (2) Final exam is justified in order to solve those legal problems. (3) It is the way to respect the students‘ rights.