Rawls, tolerancia internacional y las modernidades alternativas

  1. Álvarez García, David
Revista:
Enrahonar: an international journal of theoretical and practical reason

ISSN: 0211-402X,  2014-881X

Ano de publicación: 2009

Título do exemplar: Rawls

Número: 43

Páxinas: 181-203

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDDD editor

Outras publicacións en: Enrahonar: an international journal of theoretical and practical reason

Resumo

This article analyses the problems of the transition from a modus vivendi to a moral conception of toleration and its extension to the international realm in the work of John Rawls. This essay starts from conceptual problems implicit in the experience of the European Reform, an inspiring historical event in the emergence of political liberalism, and analyses its development and accommodation to the current globalized context. Special attention is paid to the problems arising from the commitment with dissenting transformative movements within consultation hierarchies and the demands of tolerant egalitarian recognition by non-liberal societies. We defend that it is possible to hold and alternative reading within this frame. It enables us to explore the potential for reflexive evolution in the Society of Peoples as a realistic utopia. If traditional societies peoples have the capacity to develop modernising «creative adaptations» (alternative modernities), there would be realistic conditions for a thicker global basic structure, a higher degree of international cooperation and channels institutionalise individual rights.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AGRA, María Xosé (1997). «Una concepción clásica de la justicia social y política». Daimón. Revista de Filosofía, 15, 135-156.
  • AGRA, María Xosé (2004). «Antes y después de Rawls. La filosofía política en la brecha». Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política, 32, 71-92.
  • ANGHIE, Antony (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • BENHAHIB, Seyla (2004). «The Law of Peoples, distributive justice and migrations». Fordham Law Review. Symposium on Rawls and the Law. 72:5, 1761-1788.
  • BENHAHIB, Seyla (2007). «Another Universalism: On the Unity and Diversity of Human Rights», The Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, 81:2, 7-32.
  • BLAKE, Michael (2002). «Toleration and Reciprocity: commentary on Martha Nussbaum and Henry Shue». Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 1:3, 325-335.
  • BROWN, Wendy (2006). Regulating Aversion. Toleration in an Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • COHEN, Joshua (2004). «Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?». The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12:2, 190-213.
  • COHEN, Joshua (2006). «A Human Right to Democracy?». En: Ch. SYPNOWICH (ed.). The Egalitarian Conscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 226-250.
  • te teniendo en mente las movilizaciones recientes en Birmania y Tibet en nombre de la democratización y la autodeterminación. Ver: Taylor (1996). Joshua Cohen esboza una estrategia de acomodación de la tradición confuciana a estándares de derechos humanos en Cohen (2004), p. 203-207. Cohen y Sabel defienden una estrategia mixta en la que confían en que los efectos transformadores de los procesos de integración global complementen la mayor amplitud de integración de una concepción minimalista de los derechos humanos. Ver: Cohen y Sabel (2005), p. 788-790 y Cohen (2006).
  • COHEN, Joshua y SABEL, Charles (2005). «Global Democracy?». NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 37:4, 763-797.
  • CREPPELL, Ingrid (2008). «Toleration, Politics and the Role of Mutuality». En: Melissa WILLIAMS y Jeremy WALDRON (eds.). The Limits of Toleration. NOMOS, XLVIII, New York University Press.
  • DEES, Richard (2004). Trust and Toleration. Londres: Routledge.
  • FELDMAN, Noah (2007) «Cosmopolitan Law?». Yale Law Journal, 116, 1022-1070.
  • FOLLESDAL, Andreas (2006). «Justice, Stability and Toleration». En: MARTIN & REDDY (eds.). Rawls’s Law of Peoples. A Realistic Utopia?. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 299-317.
  • FORST, Rainer (2003). «Toleration, Justice and Reason». En: MCKINNON y CASTIGLIONE (eds.). The culture of toleration in diverse societies. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. 71-85.
  • GRAY, John (2000). Two Faces of Liberalism. Londres: Polity Press.
  • HABERMAS, Jürgen (1995). «Reconciliation through the public use of reason». Journal of Philosophy, 92:3, 109-131.
  • HABERMAS, Jürgen (2006). Entre naturalismo y religión. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • HABERMAS, Jürgen (2008). «Notes on a post-secular society». Signandsight.com, (18 de junio de 2008; http://www.signandsight.com/features/1714.html).
  • KAUFMAN, Alexander (2006). «Rawls’s Practical Conception of Justice: Opinion, Tradition and Objectivity in Political Liberalism». Journal of Moral Philosophy, 3:1, 23-43.
  • KEENE, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society. Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • KOSKENNIEMI, Martti (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MACEDO, Stephen (2004). «What Self-governing Peoples Owe to One Another: Universalism, Diversity and the Law of Peoples». Fordham Law Review, 72.
  • MCCARTHY, Thomas (2001). «On Reconciling Cosmopolitan Unity and National Diversity». En: Dilip P. GAONKAR (ed.). Alternative Modernities. London: Duke University Press, p. 197-235.
  • MCCARTHY, Thomas (2007). «From Modernism to Mesianism: Liberal Developmentalism and American Exceptionalism». Constellations, 14:1 (2007), p. 3-30.
  • MOON, Donald (2003). «Rawls and Habermas on Public Reason: Human Rights and Global Justice». Annual Review of Political Science, 6, p. 257-274.
  • NAGEL, Thomas (1991). Equality and Partility. Oxord: Oxford University Press.
  • NAGEL, Thomas (2003). Rawls and Liberalism. En: Samuel FREEMAN (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 62-85.
  • NUSSBAUM, Martha (2002). «Women and the Law of Peoples». Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 1:3, p. 283-306.
  • OKIN, Susan Moller (2005). «Multiculturalism and Feminism: no simple question, no simple answers». En: A. EISENBERG y J. SPINNER-HALEV (eds.).Minorities within Minorities. Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 67-89.
  • PHILPOTT, Daniel (2001). Revolutions in Sovereignty. How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • POGGE, Thomas (2004). «La incoherencia entre las teorías de la justicia de Rawls». Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política, 23, p. 28-48.
  • RAWLS, John (1995). «Reply to Habermas», Journal of Philosophy, 92:3, p. 132-80.
  • RAWLS, John (1999). The Law of Peoples, with «The Idea of Public Reason Revisited». Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • RAWLS, John (2001). Justice as Fairness. A Restatement. Erin Kelly (ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • RAWLS, John (2005). Political Liberalism. Expanded Edition. Harvard University Press.
  • RAWLS, John y VAN PARIJS, Philippe (2003). «Three Letters on the Law of Peoples and the European Union». Revue de Philosopie Économique, 7, p. 7-19.
  • ROSAS, Joao Cardoso (2002). «Rawls in Portugal and Spain». European Journal of Political Philosophy, 1:2, p. 243-255.
  • SCANLON, T. M. (2003). The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie (2004). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • TAN, Kok-Chor (2006). The Problem of Decent Peoples. En: MARTIN & REDDY (eds.). Rawls’s Law of Peoples. A Realistic Utopia?. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 76-94.
  • TAYLOR, Charles (1996). «A World Consensus on Human Rights?». Dissent, 43 (Summer), p. 15-21.
  • TAYLOR, Charles (2001). «Two Theories of Modernity». En: Dilip P. GAONKAR (ed.). Alternative Modernities. Londres: Duke University Press.
  • TAYLOR, Charles y GAONKAR, Dilip (2003). «Block Thinking and Internal Criticism». Public Culture, p. 18:3.
  • WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel (2006). European Universalim. The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press.
  • WALZER, Michael (1987). Interpretation and Social Criticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • WALZER, Michael (1994). Thick and Thin. Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame Press.
  • WILLIAMS, Bernard (1996). Toleration: An Impossible Virtue? En: David HEYD (ed.). Toleration: An Elusive Virtue. Princeton University Press, 1996.
  • WILLIAMS, Bernard (1999). Tolerating the Intolerable. En: Susan MENDUS (ed.). The Politics of Toleration. Tolerance and Intolerance in Modern Life. Edinburg U. P. 1999.
  • WILLIAMS, Bernard (2005 [1996]). Toleration, a Political or Moral Question?. En: G. HAWTHRON (ed.). In the Beginning Was the Deed. Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press.
  • WILLIAMS, Melissa (2005). «Tolerable Liberalism». En: A. EISENBERG y J. SPINNERHALEV (eds.). Minorities within Minorities. Equality, Rights and Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 19-40.
  • ZAGORIN, Perez (2003). How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet