Benchmarking en responsabilidad social corporativa. El caso de las empresas gallegas

  1. González Vázquez, Encarnación 1
  2. Alén González, María Elisa 1
  3. Rodríguez Comesaña, Lorenzo 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Revista:
Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión

ISSN: 1131-6837

Ano de publicación: 2011

Volume: 11

Número: 1

Páxinas: 101-120

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5295/CDG.100226EG DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openADDI editor

Outras publicacións en: Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ARAQUE PADILLA, R.; MONTERO SIMÓ, M.J. (2005): “Una propuesta de sistematización del marco de relaciones de las entidades no lucrativas: un enfoque basado en los stakeholders”, Icade: Revista de las Facultades de Derecho y Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, nº 65, pp. 111-134.
  • ARAQUE PADILLA, R. (2009): “Empresa y sociedad: el enfoque de la responsabilidad social de la empresa”, Revista de Fomento Social, nº 256, pp. 679-686.
  • ARGANDOÑA, A y VON WEILTZIEN HOIVIK, H (2009): “Corporate Social Responsibility: One size does not fit all. Collecting evidence from Europe”, Journal of Business Ethics, Nº. 89, pp. 221-234
  • BAJO DAVO, N.; DURÁN HERRERA, J.J. (2009): “Responsabilidad social y variables estratégicas en las grandes empresas españolas”, Revista de responsabilidad social en la empresa, nº 2, pp. 51-76.
  • CAMPBELL, L.; GULAS, C. S. y GRUCA, T. S. (1999): “Corporate Giving Behavior and DecisionMaker Social Consciousness”, Journal of Business Ethics, Nº. 19, pp.375–383.
  • COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS (2001): Libro verde. Fomentar un marco europeo para la responsabilidad social de las empresas. Disponible en, http://europa.eu/eur-lex/es/ com/gpr/2001/com2001_0366es01.pdf
  • DONALDSON, T. y PRESTON, L. R. (1995): “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 65–91.
  • FORÉTICA (2006): Evolución de la responsabilidad social de las empresas en España. (Disponible en www.foretica.es).
  • GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (2002): Final report of the measurement working group. Disponible en, http://www.globalreporting.org
  • GRAAFLAND, J.J. y EIJFFINGER, SCW (2004): “Corporate social responsibility of Dutch companies: Benchmarking, transparency and robustness”, De Economist, nº 152, pp. 403-426.
  • GRAAFLAND, J.J. y EIJFFINGER, SCW y SMID, H. (2004): “Benchmarking of Corporate Social Responsibility: Methodological Problems and Robustness”, Journal of Business Ethics, nº 53, pp. 137-152.
  • GRAAFLAND, JJ (2002): “Modelling the trade off between profits and principles”, De Economist, nº 150, pp. 129-154.
  • GRAVES, SB; WADDOCK, SA y KELLY, J (2002): “100 best corporate citizens”, Business Ethics, vol. 11, nº 2, pp. 8-13.
  • HILLMAN, A. J. y KEIM, G. D. (2001): “Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 125–139.
  • IGALENS, J y GOND, J-P (2005): “Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A critical and empirical analysis of ARESE data”, Journal of Business Ethics, Nº 56, pp. 131-148
  • INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (2002): Business in Society: Making a positive and responsible contribution. ICC: Paris.
  • JOYNER, B. E. y PAYNE, D. (2002): “Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 41, pp. 297–311.
  • JOYNER, B.E. y RAIBORN, CA (2005): “Management caveats for measuring and assessing public responsibility performance”, Business horizons, nº. 48, 525-533
  • KOLODINSKY, RW; MADDEN, TM; ZISK, DS y HENKEL, ET (2010): “Attitudes about Corporate Social Responsibility: Business student predictors”, Journal of Business Ethics, Nº. 91, pp. 167-181.
  • KRUT, R y MUNIS, K (1998): “Sustainable industrial development: benchmarking environmental policies and reports”, Greener Management International, nº 21, pp. 88-98.
  • LANTOS, G. P. (2001): “The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18, pp. 595–630.
  • MARGOLIS, J. D. y WALSH, J. P. (2003): “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, pp. 268–305.
  • MCWILLIAMS, A. y SIEGEL, D. (2001): “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, pp. 117–127.
  • ORLITZKY, M.; SCHMIDT, F. L. y RYNES, S. L. (2003): “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Organization Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 403–441.
  • PORTER, ME y KRAMER, MR (2002): “The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 80, nº 12, pp. 56-69.
  • RUSCONI, G. (2002): “The theory and practise of social accounting: the case of the Italian post office”, paper presentado en la EBEN Conference en Bruselas.
  • TENCATI, A.; PERRINI, F. y POGUTZ, S. (2004): “New tools to foster corporate socially responsible behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, nº 53, pp. 173-190.
  • VALOR, C. (2005): “Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability”, Business and Society Review, vol. 110, nº 2, pp. 191-212.
  • WADDOCK, S. A. y GRAVES, S. B. (1997): “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, pp. 303–319.