Persistencia institucional y costes de transacción en la política electoral española

Bibliographic References

• Acemoglu, D. y Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Nueva York: Crown Business.
• Amorim Neto, O. y Cox, G. W. (1997). Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science, 41, pp. 149-174.
• Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Aoki, M. (2007). Endogenizing institutions and institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1), pp. 1-31.
• Aoki, M. (2012). Historical Sources of Institutional Trajectories in Economic Development: China, Korea and Japan compared. ADBI Working Paper, n.º 397. Tokyo.
• Brousseau, E., Garrouste, P. y Raynaud, E. (2011). Institutional changes: Alternative theories and consequences for institutional design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79, pp. 3-19.
• Caballero, G. y Arias, X. C. (2013). Transaction Cost Politics in the map of the New Institutionalism. En N. Schofield, G. Caballero G. y D. Kselman (eds.), Advances in Political Economy: Institutions, Modeling and Empirical Analysis, pp. 3-31. Springer.
• Campbell, A., Converse, Ph., Miller, W. y Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Casal Bértoa, F., Deegan-Krause, K. y Haughton, T. (2017). The Volatility of Volatility: Measuring Change in Party Vote Shares. Electoral Studies, 50, pp. 142-156.
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, n.º 4, pp. 386- 405.
• Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), pp. 1-44.
• Coase, R. H. (1999). The task of the Society. ISNIE Newsletter, 2(2), pp. 1-6.
• Converse, Ph. E. (1969). Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies, 2, pp. 139-171.
• Cox, G. W. (1997). Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Crisp, B. F., Olivella, S. y Potter, J. D. (2012). Characteristics of Electoral Contexts that Impede Voter Coordination. Electoral Studies, 31, pp. 143-158.
• Christensen, R. V. (1996). Strategic Imperatives of Japan’s SNTV Electoral System and the Cooperative Innovations of the Former Opposition Parties. Comparative Political Studies, 29, pp. 312-334.
• Dixit, A. (1996). The making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Dixit, A. (2009). Governance Institutions and Economic Activity. American Economic Review, 99(1), pp. 5-24.
• Epstein, D. y O’Halloran, S. (1999). Delegating powers. A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Greif, A. (1998). Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis. The American Economic Review, 88(2), pp. 80-84.
• Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Greif, A. y Kingston, C. (2011). Institutions: Rules or equilibrium. En N. Schofield y G. Caballero (eds.), Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting. Berlin y Heidelberg: Springer.
• Greif, A. y Laitin, D. (2004). A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change. American Political Science Review, 98(4), pp. 633-652.
• Heiner, R. A. (1983). The origin of predictable behavior. American Economic Review, 73(4), pp. 560- 595.
• Johnston, R. (2006). Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, pp. 329-351.
• Kedar, O., Harsgor, L. y Tuttnauer, O. (2020). Permissibility of Electoral Systems: A New Look at an Old Question. Journal of Politics. doi. org/10.1086/709835
• Laakso, M. y Taagepera, R. (1979). «Effective» number of parties. A measure with applications to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12, pp. 3-27.
• Lago, I. (2005). El voto estratégico en las elecciones generales en España (1977-2000): efectos y mecanismos causales en la explicación del comportamiento electoral. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
• Lago, I. y Torcal, M. (2020). Electoral Coordination and Party System Institutionalization. Party Politics, 26(5), pp. 570-580.
• Ménard, C. (2005). A new institutional approach to organization. En C. Ménard y M. Shirley (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Dordrecht: Springer.
• North, D. C. (1990a). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• North, D. C. (1990b). A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), pp. 355-367.
• North, D. C. (1999). In Anticipation of the Marriage of Political and Economic Theory. En J. Alt, M. Levi y E. Otrom, Competition and Cooperation. Conversations with Nobelists about Economics and Political Science, pp. 314-317. Nueva York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Ostrom, E. (2004). Rules without enforcement are but words on paper. IHDP, 2, pp. 8-12.
• Peters, G. B. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. London, New York: Continuum.
• Pierson, P. (2000). Path Dependence, Increasing Returns and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94, pp. 251-267.
• Sorensen, R. J. (2006). Local government consolidations: The impact of political transaction costs. Public Choice, 127, pp. 75-95.
• Spiller, P. T. y Tommasi, M. (2007). The institutional foundations of Public policy in Argentina. A transaction cost approach. Cambridge University Press.
• Twight, C. (1994). Political Transaction-Cost Manipulation. An integrating theory. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(2), pp. 189-216.
• Vanhuysse, P. (2002). Efficiency in Politics: Competing Economic Approaches. Political Studies, 50, pp. 136-149.
• Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, pp. 595- 613.
• Wood, B. D. y Bohte, J. (2004). Political transaction costs and the politics of administrative design. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), pp. 176-202.