Incertidumbre knightiana y reconstrucción de la política económica

  1. Xosé Carlos Arias 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Journal:
Revista Atlántida: Revista Canaria de Ciencias Sociales

ISSN: 2171-4924

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 14

Pages: 45-59

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25145/J.ATLANTID.2023.14.03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRIULL editor

More publications in: Revista Atlántida: Revista Canaria de Ciencias Sociales

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

In an environment of radical or Knightian uncertainty, caused by a succession of unexpected crises and the appearance of some large-scale disruptive transformation processes, in recent years the idea of economic policy has undergone some transcendental changes, forming part of the attempts to rebuild the social contract. Beyond the efforts to “rethink macroeconomic policy,” these changes advanced on three axes: the complex and tense relationship between economic reasons and democratic politics; a new distribution of roles, links and synergies between the public and private spheres, States and markets; and a renewed temporality of the policymaking. It is possible to glimpse the growing prominence of the objective of income distribution and of a supply-side policy that is very different from that of the past.

Bibliographic References

  • Acemoglu, D. y Robinson, J (2013). Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 2: 173-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.2.173.
  • Aghion, P., Antonin, C. y Bunel, S. (2020). Le pouvoir de la destruction créatice. Editions Ódile Jacob (v.e., Deusto, 2021).
  • Arias, X.C. (2020). Finanzas-relámpago y política económica. Revista Internacional de Política Económica, IREP, 2(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.7203/IREP.2.1.17748.
  • Arias, X.C. (2021). Economía española: Las instituciones importan. Papeles de Economía Española, (168), 2-189.
  • Arias, X.C. y Costas, A. (2021). Laberintos de la prosperidad. Galaxia Gutenberg, Barcelona.
  • Blanchard, O. y Summers, L. (2017, octubre, 8). Rethinking stabilization policy: Back to the future. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://piie.com/events/rethinking-macroeconomic-policy.
  • Brennan, G. y Buchanan, J. (1985). The Reasons of Rules. Cambridge University Press.
  • Costas, A. y Arias, X.C. (2022). «Tras la gran parada: Transformaciones disruptivas y nuevo contrato social», en R. Garrido-Yserte y T. Mancha (eds.), Repensar el futuro. Tendencias y desafíos de una economía pos-COVID. Catarata, Madrid.
  • Coyle, D. (2021). Cogs and Monsters: What Economics Is, and What It Should Be. Princeton University Press.
  • Frey, B. (1983). Para una política económica democrática. Alianza, Madrid.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2022). Liberalism and Its Discontents. Profile Books (v. e., Deusto, 2022).
  • Gaspar, V., Medas, P. y Perrelli, R. (2021). Global Debt Reaches a Record $226 Trillion. IMF Blog. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2021/12/15/blog-global-debt-reaches-a-record-226-trillion.
  • Gobierno de España (2021). España 2050. Fundamentos y propuestas para una Estrategia Nacional de Largo Plazo. Ministerio de la Presidencia. https://bit.ly/2UE3tur.
  • Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
  • Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission Economy. Penguin (v.e. Taurus, 2021).
  • Ostry, J., Berg, A. y Tsangarides, C. (2014). Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth. International Monetary Fund, IMF Staff Discussion Note. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/ Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2016/12/31/Redistribution-Inequality-and-Growth-41291.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. Cambridge-Mass. (v. e. FCE, 2006)
  • Rodrik, D. (2022). The New Productivism Paradigm? Project Syndicate, 5/7. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/new-productivism-economic-policy-paradigm-by-dani-rodrik-2022-07?barrier=accesspaylog.
Data source: Dialnet