Teoría situacional de los públicoslas nuevas aportaciones desde la década de los noventa

  1. Míguez González, María Isabel
Revista:
Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

ISSN: 0214-0039

Ano de publicación: 2006

Volume: 19

Número: 2

Páxinas: 133-162

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

Resumo

este estudio revisa y clasifica algunas investigaciones recientes sobre la teoría situacional, detectando que la mayoría tratan de incorporar nuevas variables a la teoría o buscan su aplicación conjunta con otros modelos, aunque pocas actúan sobre su estructura o modifican sus elementos básicos. El estudio concluye que pocas de estas propuestas han tenido continuidad y la mayoría carecen de estudios empíricos posteriores que confirmen su validez; sin embargo, todas corroboran la teoría situacional y, al vincularla con temas de actualidad, demuestran su permanencia

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ATWOOD, L. Erwin, y MAJOR, Ann Marie, “Applying situational communication theory to an international political problem: two studies”, Journalism Quarterly, vol. LXVIII, nº 1/2, primavera-verano 1991, pp. 200-210.
  • BOTAN, Carl H., y SOTO, Francisco, “A semiotic approach to the internal functioning of publics: implications for strategic communication and public relations”, Public Relations Review, vol. XXIV, nº 1, 1998, pp. 21-44.
  • CAMERON, Glen T., “Memory for investor relations messages: an information-procesing study of Grunig’s situational theory”, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. IV, nº 1, 1992, pp. 45-60.
  • CHAY-NEMETH, Constance, “Revisiting publics: a critical archaeology of publics in the Thai HIV/AIDS issue”, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. XIII, nº 2, 2001, pp. 127- 162.
  • COZIER, Zoraida R., y WITMER, Dianne F., “The development for a structuration analysis of new publics in a electronic environment”, en HEATH, Robert L. (ed.), Handbook of public relations, 2001, pp. 615-623.
  • DEWEY, John, The public and its problems, Swallow, Chicago, 1927.
  • GRUNIG, James E., “Constructing public relations theory and practice”, en DERVIN, Brenda, CHAFFEE, Steven H., y FOREMN-WERNET, Lois (eds.), Communication, another kind of horse race: Essays honoring Richard F. Carter, Hampton Press, Cresskill (New Jersey), 2003, pp. 85-115.
  • GRUNIG, James E., “A situational theory of publics: conceptual history, recent challenges and new research”, en MOSS, Danny, MacMANUS, Toby, y VERCIC, Dejan (eds.), Public relations research: an international perspective, International Thomson Business Press, London, 1997, pp. 3-46.
  • GRUNIG, James E., “Publics, audiences and market segments: segmentation principles for campaigns”, en SALMON, Charles T. (ed.), Information campaigns: balancing social values and social change, Sage, Newbury Park (California), 1989, pp. 199-228.
  • GRUNIG, James E., “The message-attitude-behavior relationship: communication behaviors of organizations”, Communication Research, vol. IX, 1982, pp. 163-200.
  • GRUNIG, James E., “The role of information in economic decisión making”, Journalism Monographs, nº 3, 1966, pp. 1-51.
  • GRUNIG, James E., y HUNT, Todd, Dirección de Relaciones Públicas, Gestión 2000, Barcelona, 2000.
  • GRUNIG, Larissa A., y GRUNIG, James E. (eds.), Public Relations Research Annual, vol. III, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1991.
  • HALLAHAN, Kirk, “Inactive publics: the forgotten publics in public relations”, Public Relations Review, vol. XXVI, nº 4, invierno 2000, pp. 499-515.
  • HAMILTON, Peter K., “Grunig’s situational theory: a replication, application, and extension”, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. IV, nº 3, 1992, pp. 123-149.
  • KARLBERG, Michael: “Remembering the public in public relation research: from theoretical to operational symmetry”, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. VIII, nº 4, 1996, pp. 263-278.
  • MAJOR, Ann Marie, “The utility of situational theory of publics for assessing public response to a disaster prediction”, Public Relations Review, vol. XXIV, nº 4, invierno 1998, pp. 489-508.
  • MAJOR, Ann Marie, “Environmental concern and situational communication theory: implications for communicating with environmental publics”, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. V, nº 4, 1993, pp. 251-268.
  • ROGERS, Ronald W., “A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change”, Journal of Pshychology, nº 91, pp. 93-114.
  • ROSER, Connie, y THOMPSON, Margaret, “Fear appeals and the formation of active publics”, Journal of Communication, vol. VL, nº 1, invierno 1995, pp. 103-121.
  • SLATER, Michael D., CHIPMAN, Helen, et al., “Information processing and situational theory: a cognitive response analysis”, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. IV, nº 4, 1992, pp. 189-203.
  • VAN LEUVEN, James K., y SLATER, Michael D., “How publics, public relations, and the media shape the public opinion process”, en GRUNIG, Larissa A. y GRUNIG, James E. (eds.), Public Relations Research Annual, vol. III, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1991, pp. 165-178.
  • VAN LIERE, Kent D., y DUNLAP, Riley E., “Environmental concern: does it make a difference how it’s measured?, Environment and Behavior, vol. XIII, nº 6, pp. 651-676.
  • VASQUEZ, Gabriel M., “Testing a communication theory-method-message-behavior complex for the investigation of publics”, Journal of Public Relations Research, vol VI, nº 4, 1994, pp. 267-291.
  • VASQUEZ, Gabriel M., “A homo narrans paradigm for public relations: combining Bormann’s symbolic convergence theory and Grunig’s Situational theory of publics”, Journal of Public Relations Research , vol V, nº 3, 1993, pp. 201-216.
  • YANG, Sung-Un, “The effect of organization-public relationships on organizational reputation”, paper presentado en el seminario Public Relations Management, impartido en la Universidad de Maryland en noviembre de 2004. Sin publicar.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet