Análisis de programas dirigidos a promover la educación inclusiva mediante estrategias creativas

  1. Díaz-Pereira, María del Pino 1
  2. Delgado-Parada, Joseba 1
  3. Ricoy, María-Carmen 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  2. 2 Profesora Titular de Universidad de la Universidad de Vigo
Revista:
Revista complutense de educación

ISSN: 1130-2496 1988-2793

Ano de publicación: 2024

Volume: 35

Número: 1

Páxinas: 45-56

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5209/RCED.82449 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista complutense de educación

Resumo

The possibilities offered by the school context are essential to make inclusion effective. In this sense, creative strategies represent a valuable opportunity, since creativity and social tolerance share mechanisms aimed at revaluing original and diverse situations. The aim of this paper is to develop the systematic analysis of educational programmes aimed at promoting inclusive education and supported by creative strategies. This documentary study has been adressed from a mixed approach, essentially supported by qualitative methodology with a content analysis. Initially, 289 documents were detected, from which a total of 21 school intervention programmes that met the established criteria. As results, it should be noted that the indicators of inclusion included within the objectives of the programmes vary according to the educational stage at which they are aimed, with those relating to improving social interaction and encouraging opinions predominating. Awareness raising and communication are the most frequent creative indicators for promoting school inclusion. Learning activities are mainly related to composition and drawing, while technological and artistic resources are the most frequently proposed. The premise of inclusive education supported by the creative approach is included in certain school programmes, although there is room for improvement. The results of this work provide teachers with knowledge about the type of creative indicators, activities and resources that can be useful to promote school inclusion.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agnoli, S., Runco, M. A., Kirsch, C. y Corazza, G. E. (2018). The role of motivation in the prediction of creative achievement inside and outside of school environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.05.005
  • Booth, T. y Ainscow, M. (2002). Guía para la evaluación y mejora de la educación inclusiva. Index for inclusión. Consorcio Universitario para la Educación Inclusiva.
  • Borodina, T., Sibgatullina, A. y Gizatullina, A. (2019). Developing creative thinking in future teachers as a topical issue of higher education. Journal of Social Studies Education Researh, 10(4), 226-245.
  • Bultseva, M. A. y Lebedeva, N. M. (2021). The role of intercultural competence, in the relationship between intercultural experiences and creativity among students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 82, 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.04.010
  • Cremin, T. y Chappell, K. (2021). Creative pedagogies: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 299-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757
  • Crespo, J. M. A., López, I. G. y Martín, M. M. (2013). La expresión corporal: Un proyecto para la inclusión. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 24, 107-112.
  • Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R. Hay, P. y Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education-A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
  • Dussan, C. P. (2010). Educación inclusiva: Un modelo de educación para todos. ISEES: Inclusión Social y Equidad en la Educación Superior, 8, 73-84.
  • Fanchini, A., Jongbloed, J. y Dirani, A. (2019). Examining the well-being and creativity of schoolchildren in France. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(4), 391-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1536197
  • Franklin, C. y Ballau, M. (2005). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. En R. M. Grinnell y Y. Unrau (Eds.), Social work: Research and evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative approaches (438-449). Oxford University Press.
  • Glaveanu, V. P. (2010). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture and Psychology, 16(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X10361394
  • Groyecka, A. (2018). Will becoming more creative make us more tolerant? Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 5(2), 170-176. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2018-0015
  • Groyecka, A., Gajda, A., Jankowska, D. M., Sorokowski, P. y Karwowski, M. (2020). On the benefits of thinking creatively: Why does creativity training strengthen intercultural sensitivity among children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100693
  • Hall, N. R. y Crisp, R. J. (2005). Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1435-1444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276084
  • Hanghøj, T., Lieberoth, A. y Misfeldt, M. (2018). Can cooperative video games encourage social and motivational inclusion of at risk students? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(4), 775-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12642
  • Hernández-Torrano, D. y Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975-2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
  • Jackson, J. W. y Poulsen, J. R. (2005). Contact experiences mediate the relationship between five factor model personality traits and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(4), 667-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02140.x
  • Juvonen, J., Lessard, L. M., Rastogi, R., Schacter, H. L. y Smith, D. S. (2019). Promoting social inclusion in educational settings: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 250-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655645
  • Kathiusca, K. y Alarcón, L. A. (2021). Creative methodological strategies to enhance learning styles. Revista San Gregorio, 1(48), 1-14.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.
  • Landis, J. R. y Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363-374.
  • Leech, N. L. y Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
  • Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. 30 de diciembre de 2020, Boletín Oficial del Estado, 340. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2020/12/29/3
  • López, E. E., Ferrer, B. M. y Gutiérrez, T. I. J. (2009). Las relaciones sociales en la escuela: El problema del rechazo escolar. Psicología Educativa. Revista de los Psicólogos de la Educación, 15(1), 45-60.
  • Luria, S. R., Sriraman, B. y Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 49(2), 1033-1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0892-2
  • Marín, R. y De la Torre, S. (Coords.) (1991). Manual de creatividad: Aplicaciones educativas. Vicens Vives.
  • Morgan, H., Parker, A. y Roberts, W. (2019). Community sport programmes and social inclusion: What role for positive psychological capital? Sport in Society, 22(6), 1100-1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1565397
  • Noguero, F. L. (2002). El análisis de contenido como método de investigación. En-Clave Pedagógica, 4, 167-180.
  • Praun, A. G. y De la Torre, S. (2006). Creatividad y arte. Un nuevo camino para la inclusión social. Creatividad y Sociedad: Revista de la Asociación para la Creatividad, 9, 19-31.
  • Ricoy, M. C. y Rivero, R. (2004). Aproximación al contexto y al marco teórico para el estudio del uso de los recursos didácticos en la formación de personas adultas. En J. Cardona (Dir.), La calidad territorial como estrategia: La formación clave en el desarrollo (pp. 144-162). UNED, C.A.
  • Sánchez-Martínez, C., Ricoy, M. C. y Feliz-Murias, T. (2018). Actividades y dinámicas implementadas con la tableta en un centro de educación básica de España. Educação e Pesquisa, 44, e183309. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634201844183309
  • Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C. y O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015
  • UNESCO (2020). Inclusión y educación: Todos y todas sin excepción. UNESCO.
  • Verdeja, M. (2020). Diversidad cultural en la escuela: Un espacio idóneo para la construcción de una ciudadanía crítica e inclusiva. En E. J. Díez y J. R. Rodríguez (Dirs.), Educación para el Bien Común: Hacia una práctica crítica, inclusiva y comprometida socialmente (pp. 544-556). Octaedro.
  • Winnicott, D. W. (2012). Playing and reality. Routledge.